Cargando…

Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor

In this study, the ballistic impact behavior of auxetic sandwich composite human body armor was analyzed using finite element analysis. The auxetic core of the armor was composed of discrete re-entrant unit cells. The sandwich armor structure consisted of a front panel of aluminum alloy (Al 7075-T6)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Imtiaz Alam, Khan, Rafiullah, Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian, Petrů, Michal, Badshah, Saeed, Ahmad, Sajjad, Amjad, Muhammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062064
_version_ 1784675080460042240
author Shah, Imtiaz Alam
Khan, Rafiullah
Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian
Petrů, Michal
Badshah, Saeed
Ahmad, Sajjad
Amjad, Muhammad
author_facet Shah, Imtiaz Alam
Khan, Rafiullah
Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian
Petrů, Michal
Badshah, Saeed
Ahmad, Sajjad
Amjad, Muhammad
author_sort Shah, Imtiaz Alam
collection PubMed
description In this study, the ballistic impact behavior of auxetic sandwich composite human body armor was analyzed using finite element analysis. The auxetic core of the armor was composed of discrete re-entrant unit cells. The sandwich armor structure consisted of a front panel of aluminum alloy (Al 7075-T6), UHMWPE (sandwich core), and a back facet of silicon carbide (SiC) bonded together with epoxy resin. Numerical simulations were run on Explicit Dynamics/Autodyne 3-D code. Various projectile velocities with the same boundary conditions were used to predict the auxetic armor response. These results were compared with those of conventional monolithic body armor. The results showed improved indentation resistance with the auxetic armor. Deformation in auxetic armor was observed greater for each of the cases when compared to the monolithic armor, due to higher energy absorption. The elastic energy dissipation results in the lower indentation in an auxetic armor. The armor can be used safely up to 400 m/s; being used at higher velocities significantly reduced the threat level. Conversely, the conventional monolithic modal does not allow the projectile to pass through at a velocity below 300 m/s; however, the back face becomes severely damaged at 200 m/s. At a velocity of 400 m/s, the front facet of auxetic armor was destroyed; however, the back facet was completely safe, while the monolithic panel did not withstand this velocity and was completely damaged. The results are encouraging in terms of resistance offered by the newly adopted auxetic armor compared to conventional monolithic armor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8950186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89501862022-03-26 Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor Shah, Imtiaz Alam Khan, Rafiullah Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian Petrů, Michal Badshah, Saeed Ahmad, Sajjad Amjad, Muhammad Materials (Basel) Article In this study, the ballistic impact behavior of auxetic sandwich composite human body armor was analyzed using finite element analysis. The auxetic core of the armor was composed of discrete re-entrant unit cells. The sandwich armor structure consisted of a front panel of aluminum alloy (Al 7075-T6), UHMWPE (sandwich core), and a back facet of silicon carbide (SiC) bonded together with epoxy resin. Numerical simulations were run on Explicit Dynamics/Autodyne 3-D code. Various projectile velocities with the same boundary conditions were used to predict the auxetic armor response. These results were compared with those of conventional monolithic body armor. The results showed improved indentation resistance with the auxetic armor. Deformation in auxetic armor was observed greater for each of the cases when compared to the monolithic armor, due to higher energy absorption. The elastic energy dissipation results in the lower indentation in an auxetic armor. The armor can be used safely up to 400 m/s; being used at higher velocities significantly reduced the threat level. Conversely, the conventional monolithic modal does not allow the projectile to pass through at a velocity below 300 m/s; however, the back face becomes severely damaged at 200 m/s. At a velocity of 400 m/s, the front facet of auxetic armor was destroyed; however, the back facet was completely safe, while the monolithic panel did not withstand this velocity and was completely damaged. The results are encouraging in terms of resistance offered by the newly adopted auxetic armor compared to conventional monolithic armor. MDPI 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8950186/ /pubmed/35329516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062064 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shah, Imtiaz Alam
Khan, Rafiullah
Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian
Petrů, Michal
Badshah, Saeed
Ahmad, Sajjad
Amjad, Muhammad
Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor
title Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor
title_full Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor
title_fullStr Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor
title_short Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor
title_sort finite element analysis of the ballistic impact on auxetic sandwich composite human body armor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329516
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062064
work_keys_str_mv AT shahimtiazalam finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor
AT khanrafiullah finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor
AT koloorseyedsaeidrahimian finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor
AT petrumichal finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor
AT badshahsaeed finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor
AT ahmadsajjad finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor
AT amjadmuhammad finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor