Cargando…
Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor
In this study, the ballistic impact behavior of auxetic sandwich composite human body armor was analyzed using finite element analysis. The auxetic core of the armor was composed of discrete re-entrant unit cells. The sandwich armor structure consisted of a front panel of aluminum alloy (Al 7075-T6)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062064 |
_version_ | 1784675080460042240 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Imtiaz Alam Khan, Rafiullah Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian Petrů, Michal Badshah, Saeed Ahmad, Sajjad Amjad, Muhammad |
author_facet | Shah, Imtiaz Alam Khan, Rafiullah Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian Petrů, Michal Badshah, Saeed Ahmad, Sajjad Amjad, Muhammad |
author_sort | Shah, Imtiaz Alam |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, the ballistic impact behavior of auxetic sandwich composite human body armor was analyzed using finite element analysis. The auxetic core of the armor was composed of discrete re-entrant unit cells. The sandwich armor structure consisted of a front panel of aluminum alloy (Al 7075-T6), UHMWPE (sandwich core), and a back facet of silicon carbide (SiC) bonded together with epoxy resin. Numerical simulations were run on Explicit Dynamics/Autodyne 3-D code. Various projectile velocities with the same boundary conditions were used to predict the auxetic armor response. These results were compared with those of conventional monolithic body armor. The results showed improved indentation resistance with the auxetic armor. Deformation in auxetic armor was observed greater for each of the cases when compared to the monolithic armor, due to higher energy absorption. The elastic energy dissipation results in the lower indentation in an auxetic armor. The armor can be used safely up to 400 m/s; being used at higher velocities significantly reduced the threat level. Conversely, the conventional monolithic modal does not allow the projectile to pass through at a velocity below 300 m/s; however, the back face becomes severely damaged at 200 m/s. At a velocity of 400 m/s, the front facet of auxetic armor was destroyed; however, the back facet was completely safe, while the monolithic panel did not withstand this velocity and was completely damaged. The results are encouraging in terms of resistance offered by the newly adopted auxetic armor compared to conventional monolithic armor. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8950186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89501862022-03-26 Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor Shah, Imtiaz Alam Khan, Rafiullah Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian Petrů, Michal Badshah, Saeed Ahmad, Sajjad Amjad, Muhammad Materials (Basel) Article In this study, the ballistic impact behavior of auxetic sandwich composite human body armor was analyzed using finite element analysis. The auxetic core of the armor was composed of discrete re-entrant unit cells. The sandwich armor structure consisted of a front panel of aluminum alloy (Al 7075-T6), UHMWPE (sandwich core), and a back facet of silicon carbide (SiC) bonded together with epoxy resin. Numerical simulations were run on Explicit Dynamics/Autodyne 3-D code. Various projectile velocities with the same boundary conditions were used to predict the auxetic armor response. These results were compared with those of conventional monolithic body armor. The results showed improved indentation resistance with the auxetic armor. Deformation in auxetic armor was observed greater for each of the cases when compared to the monolithic armor, due to higher energy absorption. The elastic energy dissipation results in the lower indentation in an auxetic armor. The armor can be used safely up to 400 m/s; being used at higher velocities significantly reduced the threat level. Conversely, the conventional monolithic modal does not allow the projectile to pass through at a velocity below 300 m/s; however, the back face becomes severely damaged at 200 m/s. At a velocity of 400 m/s, the front facet of auxetic armor was destroyed; however, the back facet was completely safe, while the monolithic panel did not withstand this velocity and was completely damaged. The results are encouraging in terms of resistance offered by the newly adopted auxetic armor compared to conventional monolithic armor. MDPI 2022-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8950186/ /pubmed/35329516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062064 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Shah, Imtiaz Alam Khan, Rafiullah Koloor, Seyed Saeid Rahimian Petrů, Michal Badshah, Saeed Ahmad, Sajjad Amjad, Muhammad Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor |
title | Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor |
title_full | Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor |
title_fullStr | Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor |
title_full_unstemmed | Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor |
title_short | Finite Element Analysis of the Ballistic Impact on Auxetic Sandwich Composite Human Body Armor |
title_sort | finite element analysis of the ballistic impact on auxetic sandwich composite human body armor |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329516 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahimtiazalam finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor AT khanrafiullah finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor AT koloorseyedsaeidrahimian finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor AT petrumichal finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor AT badshahsaeed finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor AT ahmadsajjad finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor AT amjadmuhammad finiteelementanalysisoftheballisticimpactonauxeticsandwichcompositehumanbodyarmor |