Cargando…

A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia

This study evaluated the effects of different simulated chairside grinding and polishing protocols on the physical and mechanical properties of surface roughness, hardness, and flexural strength of monolithic zirconia. Sintered monolithic zirconia specimens (15 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm) were abraded using t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kheur, Mohit, Lakha, Tabrez, Shaikh, Saleha, Kheur, Supriya, Qamri, Batul, Zhen, Lee Wan, Al-Haj Husain, Nadin, Özcan, Mutlu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329653
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062202
_version_ 1784675121683759104
author Kheur, Mohit
Lakha, Tabrez
Shaikh, Saleha
Kheur, Supriya
Qamri, Batul
Zhen, Lee Wan
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Özcan, Mutlu
author_facet Kheur, Mohit
Lakha, Tabrez
Shaikh, Saleha
Kheur, Supriya
Qamri, Batul
Zhen, Lee Wan
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Özcan, Mutlu
author_sort Kheur, Mohit
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the effects of different simulated chairside grinding and polishing protocols on the physical and mechanical properties of surface roughness, hardness, and flexural strength of monolithic zirconia. Sintered monolithic zirconia specimens (15 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm) were abraded using three different burs: diamond bur, modified diamond bur (zirconia specified), and tungsten carbide bur, along with a group of unprepared specimens that served as a control group. The study was divided into two phases, Phase 1 and Phase 2. Surface roughness, surface hardness, and flexural strength were assessed before and after the grinding procedure to determine the ‘best test group’ in Phase 1. The best abrasive agent was selected for Phase 2 of the study. The specimens in Phase 2 underwent grinding with the best abrasive agent selected. Following the grinding, the specimens were then polished using commercially available diamond polishing paste, a porcelain polishing kit, and an indigenously developed low-temperature sintered zirconia slurry. The physical and mechanical properties were again assessed. Results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. Specimens were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) for their microstructure and crystalline phases, respectively. Grinding with diamond burs did not weaken zirconia (p > 0.05) but produced rougher surfaces than the control group (p < 0.05). Tungsten carbide burs did not significantly roughen the zirconia surface. However, specimens ground by tungsten carbide burs had a significantly reduced mean flexural strength (p < 0.05) and SEM revealed fine surface cracks. Phase transformation was not detected by XRD. Polishing with commercially available polishing agents, however, restored the surface roughness levels to the control group. Dental monolithic zirconia ground with tungsten carbide burs had a significantly reduced flexural strength and a smooth but defective surface. However, grinding with diamond burs roughened the zirconia surface. These defects may be reduced by polishing with commercially available polishing agents. The use of tungsten carbide burs for grinding dental zirconia should not be advocated. Grinding with diamond abrasives does not weaken zirconia but requires further polishing with commercially available polishing agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8950357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89503572022-03-26 A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia Kheur, Mohit Lakha, Tabrez Shaikh, Saleha Kheur, Supriya Qamri, Batul Zhen, Lee Wan Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu Materials (Basel) Article This study evaluated the effects of different simulated chairside grinding and polishing protocols on the physical and mechanical properties of surface roughness, hardness, and flexural strength of monolithic zirconia. Sintered monolithic zirconia specimens (15 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm) were abraded using three different burs: diamond bur, modified diamond bur (zirconia specified), and tungsten carbide bur, along with a group of unprepared specimens that served as a control group. The study was divided into two phases, Phase 1 and Phase 2. Surface roughness, surface hardness, and flexural strength were assessed before and after the grinding procedure to determine the ‘best test group’ in Phase 1. The best abrasive agent was selected for Phase 2 of the study. The specimens in Phase 2 underwent grinding with the best abrasive agent selected. Following the grinding, the specimens were then polished using commercially available diamond polishing paste, a porcelain polishing kit, and an indigenously developed low-temperature sintered zirconia slurry. The physical and mechanical properties were again assessed. Results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. Specimens were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) for their microstructure and crystalline phases, respectively. Grinding with diamond burs did not weaken zirconia (p > 0.05) but produced rougher surfaces than the control group (p < 0.05). Tungsten carbide burs did not significantly roughen the zirconia surface. However, specimens ground by tungsten carbide burs had a significantly reduced mean flexural strength (p < 0.05) and SEM revealed fine surface cracks. Phase transformation was not detected by XRD. Polishing with commercially available polishing agents, however, restored the surface roughness levels to the control group. Dental monolithic zirconia ground with tungsten carbide burs had a significantly reduced flexural strength and a smooth but defective surface. However, grinding with diamond burs roughened the zirconia surface. These defects may be reduced by polishing with commercially available polishing agents. The use of tungsten carbide burs for grinding dental zirconia should not be advocated. Grinding with diamond abrasives does not weaken zirconia but requires further polishing with commercially available polishing agents. MDPI 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8950357/ /pubmed/35329653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062202 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kheur, Mohit
Lakha, Tabrez
Shaikh, Saleha
Kheur, Supriya
Qamri, Batul
Zhen, Lee Wan
Al-Haj Husain, Nadin
Özcan, Mutlu
A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia
title A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia
title_full A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia
title_fullStr A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia
title_short A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia
title_sort comparative study on simulated chairside grinding and polishing of monolithic zirconia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329653
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062202
work_keys_str_mv AT kheurmohit acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT lakhatabrez acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT shaikhsaleha acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT kheursupriya acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT qamribatul acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT zhenleewan acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT alhajhusainnadin acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT ozcanmutlu acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT kheurmohit comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT lakhatabrez comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT shaikhsaleha comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT kheursupriya comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT qamribatul comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT zhenleewan comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT alhajhusainnadin comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia
AT ozcanmutlu comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia