Cargando…
A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia
This study evaluated the effects of different simulated chairside grinding and polishing protocols on the physical and mechanical properties of surface roughness, hardness, and flexural strength of monolithic zirconia. Sintered monolithic zirconia specimens (15 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm) were abraded using t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062202 |
_version_ | 1784675121683759104 |
---|---|
author | Kheur, Mohit Lakha, Tabrez Shaikh, Saleha Kheur, Supriya Qamri, Batul Zhen, Lee Wan Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu |
author_facet | Kheur, Mohit Lakha, Tabrez Shaikh, Saleha Kheur, Supriya Qamri, Batul Zhen, Lee Wan Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu |
author_sort | Kheur, Mohit |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study evaluated the effects of different simulated chairside grinding and polishing protocols on the physical and mechanical properties of surface roughness, hardness, and flexural strength of monolithic zirconia. Sintered monolithic zirconia specimens (15 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm) were abraded using three different burs: diamond bur, modified diamond bur (zirconia specified), and tungsten carbide bur, along with a group of unprepared specimens that served as a control group. The study was divided into two phases, Phase 1 and Phase 2. Surface roughness, surface hardness, and flexural strength were assessed before and after the grinding procedure to determine the ‘best test group’ in Phase 1. The best abrasive agent was selected for Phase 2 of the study. The specimens in Phase 2 underwent grinding with the best abrasive agent selected. Following the grinding, the specimens were then polished using commercially available diamond polishing paste, a porcelain polishing kit, and an indigenously developed low-temperature sintered zirconia slurry. The physical and mechanical properties were again assessed. Results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. Specimens were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) for their microstructure and crystalline phases, respectively. Grinding with diamond burs did not weaken zirconia (p > 0.05) but produced rougher surfaces than the control group (p < 0.05). Tungsten carbide burs did not significantly roughen the zirconia surface. However, specimens ground by tungsten carbide burs had a significantly reduced mean flexural strength (p < 0.05) and SEM revealed fine surface cracks. Phase transformation was not detected by XRD. Polishing with commercially available polishing agents, however, restored the surface roughness levels to the control group. Dental monolithic zirconia ground with tungsten carbide burs had a significantly reduced flexural strength and a smooth but defective surface. However, grinding with diamond burs roughened the zirconia surface. These defects may be reduced by polishing with commercially available polishing agents. The use of tungsten carbide burs for grinding dental zirconia should not be advocated. Grinding with diamond abrasives does not weaken zirconia but requires further polishing with commercially available polishing agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8950357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89503572022-03-26 A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia Kheur, Mohit Lakha, Tabrez Shaikh, Saleha Kheur, Supriya Qamri, Batul Zhen, Lee Wan Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu Materials (Basel) Article This study evaluated the effects of different simulated chairside grinding and polishing protocols on the physical and mechanical properties of surface roughness, hardness, and flexural strength of monolithic zirconia. Sintered monolithic zirconia specimens (15 mm × 3 mm × 3 mm) were abraded using three different burs: diamond bur, modified diamond bur (zirconia specified), and tungsten carbide bur, along with a group of unprepared specimens that served as a control group. The study was divided into two phases, Phase 1 and Phase 2. Surface roughness, surface hardness, and flexural strength were assessed before and after the grinding procedure to determine the ‘best test group’ in Phase 1. The best abrasive agent was selected for Phase 2 of the study. The specimens in Phase 2 underwent grinding with the best abrasive agent selected. Following the grinding, the specimens were then polished using commercially available diamond polishing paste, a porcelain polishing kit, and an indigenously developed low-temperature sintered zirconia slurry. The physical and mechanical properties were again assessed. Results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA test. Specimens were observed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) for their microstructure and crystalline phases, respectively. Grinding with diamond burs did not weaken zirconia (p > 0.05) but produced rougher surfaces than the control group (p < 0.05). Tungsten carbide burs did not significantly roughen the zirconia surface. However, specimens ground by tungsten carbide burs had a significantly reduced mean flexural strength (p < 0.05) and SEM revealed fine surface cracks. Phase transformation was not detected by XRD. Polishing with commercially available polishing agents, however, restored the surface roughness levels to the control group. Dental monolithic zirconia ground with tungsten carbide burs had a significantly reduced flexural strength and a smooth but defective surface. However, grinding with diamond burs roughened the zirconia surface. These defects may be reduced by polishing with commercially available polishing agents. The use of tungsten carbide burs for grinding dental zirconia should not be advocated. Grinding with diamond abrasives does not weaken zirconia but requires further polishing with commercially available polishing agents. MDPI 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8950357/ /pubmed/35329653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062202 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kheur, Mohit Lakha, Tabrez Shaikh, Saleha Kheur, Supriya Qamri, Batul Zhen, Lee Wan Al-Haj Husain, Nadin Özcan, Mutlu A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia |
title | A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia |
title_full | A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia |
title_short | A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia |
title_sort | comparative study on simulated chairside grinding and polishing of monolithic zirconia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kheurmohit acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT lakhatabrez acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT shaikhsaleha acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT kheursupriya acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT qamribatul acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT zhenleewan acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT alhajhusainnadin acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT ozcanmutlu acomparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT kheurmohit comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT lakhatabrez comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT shaikhsaleha comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT kheursupriya comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT qamribatul comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT zhenleewan comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT alhajhusainnadin comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia AT ozcanmutlu comparativestudyonsimulatedchairsidegrindingandpolishingofmonolithiczirconia |