Cargando…

Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM(10) in Makkah Saudi Arabia by Modelling Its Ion and Trace Element Contents with Positive Matrix Factorization and Generalised Additive Model

In this paper, the emission sources of PM(10) are characterised by analysing its trace elements (TE) and ions contents. PM(10) samples were collected for a year (2019–2020) at five sites and analysed. PM(10) speciated data were analysed using graphical visualization, correlation analysis, generalise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habeebullah, Turki M., Munir, Said, Zeb, Jahan, Morsy, Essam A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35324744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10030119
_version_ 1784675140468998144
author Habeebullah, Turki M.
Munir, Said
Zeb, Jahan
Morsy, Essam A.
author_facet Habeebullah, Turki M.
Munir, Said
Zeb, Jahan
Morsy, Essam A.
author_sort Habeebullah, Turki M.
collection PubMed
description In this paper, the emission sources of PM(10) are characterised by analysing its trace elements (TE) and ions contents. PM(10) samples were collected for a year (2019–2020) at five sites and analysed. PM(10) speciated data were analysed using graphical visualization, correlation analysis, generalised additive model (GAM), and positive matrix factorization (PMF). Annual average PM(10) concentrations (µg/m(3)) were 304.68 ± 155.56 at Aziziyah, 219.59 ± 87.29 at Misfalah, 173.90 ± 103.08 at Abdeyah, 168.81 ± 82.50 at Askan, and 157.60 ± 80.10 at Sanaiyah in Makkah, which exceeded WHO (15 µg/m(3)), USEPA (50 µg/m(3)), and the Saudi Arabia national (80 µg/m(3)) annual air quality standards. A GAM model was developed using PM(10) as a response and ions and TEs as predictors. Among the predictors Mg, Ca, Cr, Al, and Pb were highly significant (p < 0.01), Se, Cl, and NO(2) were significant (p < 0.05), and PO(4) and SO(4) were significant (p < 0.1). The model showed R-squared (adj) 0.85 and deviance explained 88.1%. PMF identified four main emission sources of PM(10) in Makkah: (1) Road traffic emissions (explained 51% variance); (2) Industrial emissions and mineral dust (explained 27.5% variance); (3) Restaurant and dwelling emissions (explained 13.6% variance); and (4) Fossil fuel combustion (explained 7.9% variance).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8950437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89504372022-03-26 Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM(10) in Makkah Saudi Arabia by Modelling Its Ion and Trace Element Contents with Positive Matrix Factorization and Generalised Additive Model Habeebullah, Turki M. Munir, Said Zeb, Jahan Morsy, Essam A. Toxics Article In this paper, the emission sources of PM(10) are characterised by analysing its trace elements (TE) and ions contents. PM(10) samples were collected for a year (2019–2020) at five sites and analysed. PM(10) speciated data were analysed using graphical visualization, correlation analysis, generalised additive model (GAM), and positive matrix factorization (PMF). Annual average PM(10) concentrations (µg/m(3)) were 304.68 ± 155.56 at Aziziyah, 219.59 ± 87.29 at Misfalah, 173.90 ± 103.08 at Abdeyah, 168.81 ± 82.50 at Askan, and 157.60 ± 80.10 at Sanaiyah in Makkah, which exceeded WHO (15 µg/m(3)), USEPA (50 µg/m(3)), and the Saudi Arabia national (80 µg/m(3)) annual air quality standards. A GAM model was developed using PM(10) as a response and ions and TEs as predictors. Among the predictors Mg, Ca, Cr, Al, and Pb were highly significant (p < 0.01), Se, Cl, and NO(2) were significant (p < 0.05), and PO(4) and SO(4) were significant (p < 0.1). The model showed R-squared (adj) 0.85 and deviance explained 88.1%. PMF identified four main emission sources of PM(10) in Makkah: (1) Road traffic emissions (explained 51% variance); (2) Industrial emissions and mineral dust (explained 27.5% variance); (3) Restaurant and dwelling emissions (explained 13.6% variance); and (4) Fossil fuel combustion (explained 7.9% variance). MDPI 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8950437/ /pubmed/35324744 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10030119 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Habeebullah, Turki M.
Munir, Said
Zeb, Jahan
Morsy, Essam A.
Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM(10) in Makkah Saudi Arabia by Modelling Its Ion and Trace Element Contents with Positive Matrix Factorization and Generalised Additive Model
title Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM(10) in Makkah Saudi Arabia by Modelling Its Ion and Trace Element Contents with Positive Matrix Factorization and Generalised Additive Model
title_full Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM(10) in Makkah Saudi Arabia by Modelling Its Ion and Trace Element Contents with Positive Matrix Factorization and Generalised Additive Model
title_fullStr Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM(10) in Makkah Saudi Arabia by Modelling Its Ion and Trace Element Contents with Positive Matrix Factorization and Generalised Additive Model
title_full_unstemmed Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM(10) in Makkah Saudi Arabia by Modelling Its Ion and Trace Element Contents with Positive Matrix Factorization and Generalised Additive Model
title_short Source Apportionment of Atmospheric PM(10) in Makkah Saudi Arabia by Modelling Its Ion and Trace Element Contents with Positive Matrix Factorization and Generalised Additive Model
title_sort source apportionment of atmospheric pm(10) in makkah saudi arabia by modelling its ion and trace element contents with positive matrix factorization and generalised additive model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35324744
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics10030119
work_keys_str_mv AT habeebullahturkim sourceapportionmentofatmosphericpm10inmakkahsaudiarabiabymodellingitsionandtraceelementcontentswithpositivematrixfactorizationandgeneralisedadditivemodel
AT munirsaid sourceapportionmentofatmosphericpm10inmakkahsaudiarabiabymodellingitsionandtraceelementcontentswithpositivematrixfactorizationandgeneralisedadditivemodel
AT zebjahan sourceapportionmentofatmosphericpm10inmakkahsaudiarabiabymodellingitsionandtraceelementcontentswithpositivematrixfactorizationandgeneralisedadditivemodel
AT morsyessama sourceapportionmentofatmosphericpm10inmakkahsaudiarabiabymodellingitsionandtraceelementcontentswithpositivematrixfactorizationandgeneralisedadditivemodel