Cargando…

Multi-Response Optimization of Al(2)O(3) Nanopowder-Mixed Wire Electrical Discharge Machining Process Parameters of Nitinol Shape Memory Alloy

Shape memory alloy (SMA), particularly those having a nickel–titanium combination, can memorize and regain original shape after heating. The superior properties of these alloys, such as better corrosion resistance, inherent shape memory effect, better wear resistance, and adequate superelasticity, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaudhari, Rakesh, Prajapati, Parth, Khanna, Sakshum, Vora, Jay, Patel, Vivek K., Pimenov, Danil Yurievich, Giasin, Khaled
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329469
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062018
Descripción
Sumario:Shape memory alloy (SMA), particularly those having a nickel–titanium combination, can memorize and regain original shape after heating. The superior properties of these alloys, such as better corrosion resistance, inherent shape memory effect, better wear resistance, and adequate superelasticity, as well as biocompatibility, make them a preferable alloy to be used in automotive, aerospace, actuators, robotics, medical, and many other engineering fields. Precise machining of such materials requires inputs of intellectual machining approaches, such as wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM). Machining capabilities of the process can further be enhanced by the addition of Al(2)O(3) nanopowder in the dielectric fluid. Selected input machining process parameters include the following: pulse-on time (T(on)), pulse-off time (T(off)), and Al(2)O(3) nanopowder concentration. Surface roughness (SR), material removal rate (MRR), and recast layer thickness (RLT) were identified as the response variables. In this study, Taguchi’s three levels L(9) approach was used to conduct experimental trials. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique was implemented to reaffirm the significance and adequacy of the regression model. Al(2)O(3) nanopowder was found to have the highest contributing effect of 76.13% contribution, T(on) was found to be the highest contributing factor for SR and RLT having 91.88% and 88.3% contribution, respectively. Single-objective optimization analysis generated the lowest MRR value of 0.3228 g/min (at T(on) of 90 µs, T(off) of 5 µs, and powder concentration of 2 g/L), the lowest SR value of 3.13 µm, and the lowest RLT value of 10.24 (both responses at T(on) of 30 µs, T(off) of 25 µs, and powder concentration of 2 g/L). A specific multi-objective Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) algorithm was implemented to generate optimal points which highlight the non-dominant feasible solutions. The least error between predicted and actual values suggests the effectiveness of both the regression model and the TLBO algorithms. Confirmatory trials have shown an extremely close relation which shows the suitability of both the regression model and the TLBO algorithm for the machining of the nanopowder-mixed WEDM process for Nitinol SMA. A considerable reduction in surface defects owing to the addition of Al(2)O(3) powder was observed in surface morphology analysis.