Cargando…
Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific
The design of novel biomaterials should directly influence the host-immune system and steer it towards high biocompatibility. To date, new implants/materials have been tested for biocompatibility in vitro in cell cultures and in vivo in animal models. The current methods do not reflect reality (cell...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062195 |
_version_ | 1784675255127638016 |
---|---|
author | Söhling, Nicolas Ondreka, Muriel Kontradowitz, Kerstin Reichel, Tobias Marzi, Ingo Henrich, Dirk |
author_facet | Söhling, Nicolas Ondreka, Muriel Kontradowitz, Kerstin Reichel, Tobias Marzi, Ingo Henrich, Dirk |
author_sort | Söhling, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The design of novel biomaterials should directly influence the host-immune system and steer it towards high biocompatibility. To date, new implants/materials have been tested for biocompatibility in vitro in cell cultures and in vivo in animal models. The current methods do not reflect reality (cell cultures) or are very time-consuming and deliver results only after weeks (animal model). In this proof-of-concept study, the suitability of a Whole Blood Stimulation Assay (WBSA) in combination with a Protein Profiler Array (PPA), as a readily available and cost-effective screening tool, was investigated. Three different biomaterials based on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), calcium sulphate/-carbonate (CS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were exposed to native whole blood from three volunteers and subsequently screened with a PPA. Individual reproducible protein profiles could be detected for all three materials after 24 h of incubation. The most intense reaction resulted from the use of PLGA, followed by CS. If even marginal differences in implants can be reflected in protein profiles, the combination of WBSA and PPA could serve as an early biocompatibility screening tool in the development of novel biomaterials. This may also lead to a reduction in costs and the amount of animal testing required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8950904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89509042022-03-26 Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific Söhling, Nicolas Ondreka, Muriel Kontradowitz, Kerstin Reichel, Tobias Marzi, Ingo Henrich, Dirk Materials (Basel) Article The design of novel biomaterials should directly influence the host-immune system and steer it towards high biocompatibility. To date, new implants/materials have been tested for biocompatibility in vitro in cell cultures and in vivo in animal models. The current methods do not reflect reality (cell cultures) or are very time-consuming and deliver results only after weeks (animal model). In this proof-of-concept study, the suitability of a Whole Blood Stimulation Assay (WBSA) in combination with a Protein Profiler Array (PPA), as a readily available and cost-effective screening tool, was investigated. Three different biomaterials based on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), calcium sulphate/-carbonate (CS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were exposed to native whole blood from three volunteers and subsequently screened with a PPA. Individual reproducible protein profiles could be detected for all three materials after 24 h of incubation. The most intense reaction resulted from the use of PLGA, followed by CS. If even marginal differences in implants can be reflected in protein profiles, the combination of WBSA and PPA could serve as an early biocompatibility screening tool in the development of novel biomaterials. This may also lead to a reduction in costs and the amount of animal testing required. MDPI 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8950904/ /pubmed/35329646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Söhling, Nicolas Ondreka, Muriel Kontradowitz, Kerstin Reichel, Tobias Marzi, Ingo Henrich, Dirk Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific |
title | Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific |
title_full | Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific |
title_fullStr | Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific |
title_full_unstemmed | Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific |
title_short | Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific |
title_sort | early immune response in foreign body reaction is implant/material specific |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sohlingnicolas earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific AT ondrekamuriel earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific AT kontradowitzkerstin earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific AT reicheltobias earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific AT marziingo earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific AT henrichdirk earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific |