Cargando…

Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific

The design of novel biomaterials should directly influence the host-immune system and steer it towards high biocompatibility. To date, new implants/materials have been tested for biocompatibility in vitro in cell cultures and in vivo in animal models. The current methods do not reflect reality (cell...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Söhling, Nicolas, Ondreka, Muriel, Kontradowitz, Kerstin, Reichel, Tobias, Marzi, Ingo, Henrich, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062195
_version_ 1784675255127638016
author Söhling, Nicolas
Ondreka, Muriel
Kontradowitz, Kerstin
Reichel, Tobias
Marzi, Ingo
Henrich, Dirk
author_facet Söhling, Nicolas
Ondreka, Muriel
Kontradowitz, Kerstin
Reichel, Tobias
Marzi, Ingo
Henrich, Dirk
author_sort Söhling, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description The design of novel biomaterials should directly influence the host-immune system and steer it towards high biocompatibility. To date, new implants/materials have been tested for biocompatibility in vitro in cell cultures and in vivo in animal models. The current methods do not reflect reality (cell cultures) or are very time-consuming and deliver results only after weeks (animal model). In this proof-of-concept study, the suitability of a Whole Blood Stimulation Assay (WBSA) in combination with a Protein Profiler Array (PPA), as a readily available and cost-effective screening tool, was investigated. Three different biomaterials based on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), calcium sulphate/-carbonate (CS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were exposed to native whole blood from three volunteers and subsequently screened with a PPA. Individual reproducible protein profiles could be detected for all three materials after 24 h of incubation. The most intense reaction resulted from the use of PLGA, followed by CS. If even marginal differences in implants can be reflected in protein profiles, the combination of WBSA and PPA could serve as an early biocompatibility screening tool in the development of novel biomaterials. This may also lead to a reduction in costs and the amount of animal testing required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8950904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89509042022-03-26 Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific Söhling, Nicolas Ondreka, Muriel Kontradowitz, Kerstin Reichel, Tobias Marzi, Ingo Henrich, Dirk Materials (Basel) Article The design of novel biomaterials should directly influence the host-immune system and steer it towards high biocompatibility. To date, new implants/materials have been tested for biocompatibility in vitro in cell cultures and in vivo in animal models. The current methods do not reflect reality (cell cultures) or are very time-consuming and deliver results only after weeks (animal model). In this proof-of-concept study, the suitability of a Whole Blood Stimulation Assay (WBSA) in combination with a Protein Profiler Array (PPA), as a readily available and cost-effective screening tool, was investigated. Three different biomaterials based on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), calcium sulphate/-carbonate (CS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were exposed to native whole blood from three volunteers and subsequently screened with a PPA. Individual reproducible protein profiles could be detected for all three materials after 24 h of incubation. The most intense reaction resulted from the use of PLGA, followed by CS. If even marginal differences in implants can be reflected in protein profiles, the combination of WBSA and PPA could serve as an early biocompatibility screening tool in the development of novel biomaterials. This may also lead to a reduction in costs and the amount of animal testing required. MDPI 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8950904/ /pubmed/35329646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Söhling, Nicolas
Ondreka, Muriel
Kontradowitz, Kerstin
Reichel, Tobias
Marzi, Ingo
Henrich, Dirk
Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific
title Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific
title_full Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific
title_fullStr Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific
title_full_unstemmed Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific
title_short Early Immune Response in Foreign Body Reaction Is Implant/Material Specific
title_sort early immune response in foreign body reaction is implant/material specific
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8950904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329646
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062195
work_keys_str_mv AT sohlingnicolas earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific
AT ondrekamuriel earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific
AT kontradowitzkerstin earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific
AT reicheltobias earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific
AT marziingo earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific
AT henrichdirk earlyimmuneresponseinforeignbodyreactionisimplantmaterialspecific