Cargando…

Biomechanical Analysis of Coracoid Stability After Coracoplasty: How Low Can You Go?

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic coracoplasty is a procedure for patients affected by subcoracoid impingement. To date, there is no consensus on how much of the coracoid can be resected with an arthroscopic burr without compromising its stability. PURPOSE: To determine the maximum amount of the coracoid tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heilmann, Lukas F., Sussiek, Julia, Raschke, Michael J., Langer, Martin F., Frank, Andre, Wermers, Jens, Michel, Philipp A., Dyrna, Felix, Schliemann, Benedikt, Katthagen, J. Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221077947
_version_ 1784675289586991104
author Heilmann, Lukas F.
Sussiek, Julia
Raschke, Michael J.
Langer, Martin F.
Frank, Andre
Wermers, Jens
Michel, Philipp A.
Dyrna, Felix
Schliemann, Benedikt
Katthagen, J. Christoph
author_facet Heilmann, Lukas F.
Sussiek, Julia
Raschke, Michael J.
Langer, Martin F.
Frank, Andre
Wermers, Jens
Michel, Philipp A.
Dyrna, Felix
Schliemann, Benedikt
Katthagen, J. Christoph
author_sort Heilmann, Lukas F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic coracoplasty is a procedure for patients affected by subcoracoid impingement. To date, there is no consensus on how much of the coracoid can be resected with an arthroscopic burr without compromising its stability. PURPOSE: To determine the maximum amount of the coracoid that can be resected during arthroscopic coracoplasty without leading to coracoid fracture or avulsion of the conjoint tendon during simulated activities of daily living (ADLs). STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A biomechanical cadaveric study was performed with 24 shoulders (15 male, 9 female; mean age, 81 ± 7.9 years). Specimens were randomized into 3 treatment groups: group A (native coracoid), group B (3-mm coracoplasty), and group C (5-mm coracoplasty). Coracoid anatomic measurements were documented before and after coracoplasty. The scapula was potted, and a traction force was applied through the conjoint tendon. The stiffness and load to failure (LTF) were determined for each specimen. RESULTS: The mean coracoid thicknesses in groups A through C were 7.2, 7.7, and 7.8 mm, respectively, and the mean LTFs were 428 ± 127, 284 ± 77, and 159 ± 87 N, respectively. Compared with specimens in group A, a significantly lower LTF was seen in specimens in group B (P = .022) and group C (P < .001). Postoperatively, coracoids with a thickness ≥4 mm were able to withstand ADLs. CONCLUSION: While even a 3-mm coracoplasty caused significant weakening of the coracoid, the individual failure loads were higher than those of the predicted ADLs. A critical value of 4 mm of coracoid thickness should be preserved to ensure the stability of the coracoid process. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In correspondence with the findings of this study, careful preoperative planning should be used to measure the maximum reasonable amount of coracoplasty to be performed. A postoperative coracoid thickness of 4 mm should remain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8951046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89510462022-03-26 Biomechanical Analysis of Coracoid Stability After Coracoplasty: How Low Can You Go? Heilmann, Lukas F. Sussiek, Julia Raschke, Michael J. Langer, Martin F. Frank, Andre Wermers, Jens Michel, Philipp A. Dyrna, Felix Schliemann, Benedikt Katthagen, J. Christoph Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic coracoplasty is a procedure for patients affected by subcoracoid impingement. To date, there is no consensus on how much of the coracoid can be resected with an arthroscopic burr without compromising its stability. PURPOSE: To determine the maximum amount of the coracoid that can be resected during arthroscopic coracoplasty without leading to coracoid fracture or avulsion of the conjoint tendon during simulated activities of daily living (ADLs). STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A biomechanical cadaveric study was performed with 24 shoulders (15 male, 9 female; mean age, 81 ± 7.9 years). Specimens were randomized into 3 treatment groups: group A (native coracoid), group B (3-mm coracoplasty), and group C (5-mm coracoplasty). Coracoid anatomic measurements were documented before and after coracoplasty. The scapula was potted, and a traction force was applied through the conjoint tendon. The stiffness and load to failure (LTF) were determined for each specimen. RESULTS: The mean coracoid thicknesses in groups A through C were 7.2, 7.7, and 7.8 mm, respectively, and the mean LTFs were 428 ± 127, 284 ± 77, and 159 ± 87 N, respectively. Compared with specimens in group A, a significantly lower LTF was seen in specimens in group B (P = .022) and group C (P < .001). Postoperatively, coracoids with a thickness ≥4 mm were able to withstand ADLs. CONCLUSION: While even a 3-mm coracoplasty caused significant weakening of the coracoid, the individual failure loads were higher than those of the predicted ADLs. A critical value of 4 mm of coracoid thickness should be preserved to ensure the stability of the coracoid process. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In correspondence with the findings of this study, careful preoperative planning should be used to measure the maximum reasonable amount of coracoplasty to be performed. A postoperative coracoid thickness of 4 mm should remain. SAGE Publications 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8951046/ /pubmed/35340899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221077947 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Heilmann, Lukas F.
Sussiek, Julia
Raschke, Michael J.
Langer, Martin F.
Frank, Andre
Wermers, Jens
Michel, Philipp A.
Dyrna, Felix
Schliemann, Benedikt
Katthagen, J. Christoph
Biomechanical Analysis of Coracoid Stability After Coracoplasty: How Low Can You Go?
title Biomechanical Analysis of Coracoid Stability After Coracoplasty: How Low Can You Go?
title_full Biomechanical Analysis of Coracoid Stability After Coracoplasty: How Low Can You Go?
title_fullStr Biomechanical Analysis of Coracoid Stability After Coracoplasty: How Low Can You Go?
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Analysis of Coracoid Stability After Coracoplasty: How Low Can You Go?
title_short Biomechanical Analysis of Coracoid Stability After Coracoplasty: How Low Can You Go?
title_sort biomechanical analysis of coracoid stability after coracoplasty: how low can you go?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35340899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221077947
work_keys_str_mv AT heilmannlukasf biomechanicalanalysisofcoracoidstabilityaftercoracoplastyhowlowcanyougo
AT sussiekjulia biomechanicalanalysisofcoracoidstabilityaftercoracoplastyhowlowcanyougo
AT raschkemichaelj biomechanicalanalysisofcoracoidstabilityaftercoracoplastyhowlowcanyougo
AT langermartinf biomechanicalanalysisofcoracoidstabilityaftercoracoplastyhowlowcanyougo
AT frankandre biomechanicalanalysisofcoracoidstabilityaftercoracoplastyhowlowcanyougo
AT wermersjens biomechanicalanalysisofcoracoidstabilityaftercoracoplastyhowlowcanyougo
AT michelphilippa biomechanicalanalysisofcoracoidstabilityaftercoracoplastyhowlowcanyougo
AT dyrnafelix biomechanicalanalysisofcoracoidstabilityaftercoracoplastyhowlowcanyougo
AT schliemannbenedikt biomechanicalanalysisofcoracoidstabilityaftercoracoplastyhowlowcanyougo
AT katthagenjchristoph biomechanicalanalysisofcoracoidstabilityaftercoracoplastyhowlowcanyougo