Cargando…

Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates

Purpose: to evaluate a unique subpopulation of radical prostatectomy (RP) candidates with “negative” prostate (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) imaging scans and to characterize the clinical implications of misleading...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenzweig, Barak, Haramaty, Rennen, Davidson, Tima, Lazarovich, Alon, Shvero, Asaf, Haifler, Miki, Gal, Jonathan, Golan, Shay, Shpitzer, Sagi, Hoffman, Azik, Nativ, Omri, Freifeld, Yuval, Zreik, Rani, Dotan, Zohar A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030410
_version_ 1784675301529223168
author Rosenzweig, Barak
Haramaty, Rennen
Davidson, Tima
Lazarovich, Alon
Shvero, Asaf
Haifler, Miki
Gal, Jonathan
Golan, Shay
Shpitzer, Sagi
Hoffman, Azik
Nativ, Omri
Freifeld, Yuval
Zreik, Rani
Dotan, Zohar A.
author_facet Rosenzweig, Barak
Haramaty, Rennen
Davidson, Tima
Lazarovich, Alon
Shvero, Asaf
Haifler, Miki
Gal, Jonathan
Golan, Shay
Shpitzer, Sagi
Hoffman, Azik
Nativ, Omri
Freifeld, Yuval
Zreik, Rani
Dotan, Zohar A.
author_sort Rosenzweig, Barak
collection PubMed
description Purpose: to evaluate a unique subpopulation of radical prostatectomy (RP) candidates with “negative” prostate (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) imaging scans and to characterize the clinical implications of misleading findings. Materials and Methods: This case-control retrospective study compared the final histological outcomes of patients with “negative” pre-RP PSMA PET/CT prostate scans (with a prostate maximal standardized uptake value [SUVmax] below the physiologic uptake) to those with an “intense” prostatic tracer uptake (with a SUVmax above the physiologic uptake). The patients underwent an RP between March 2015 and July 2019 in five academic centers. Data on the demographics, comorbidities, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and rectal exam findings, prior biopsies, imaging results, biopsies, and RP histology results were collected. Results: Ninety-seven of the 392 patients who underwent an RP had PSMA PET/CT imaging preoperatively. Fifty-two (54%) had a “negative” uptake (in the study group), and 45 (46%) had a “positive” uptake (in the control group). Only the lesion size and SUVmax values on the PSMA PET/CT differed between the groups preoperatively. On the histological analysis, only the ISUP score, seminal vesicles invasion, T stage, and positive margin rates differed between the groups (p < 0.05), while 50 (96%) study group patients harbored clinically significant disease (ISUP ≥ 2), with an extra-prostatic disease in 24 (46%), perineural invasion in 35 (67%), and positive lymph nodes in 4 (8%). Conclusions: Disease aggressiveness generally correlated with an intense PSMA uptake on the preoperative PSMA PET/CT, but a subpopulation of patients with clinically significant cancer and aggressive characteristics showed a deceptively weak PSMA uptake. These data raise a concern about the unqualified application of PSMA PET/CT for staging RP candidates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8951096
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89510962022-03-26 Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates Rosenzweig, Barak Haramaty, Rennen Davidson, Tima Lazarovich, Alon Shvero, Asaf Haifler, Miki Gal, Jonathan Golan, Shay Shpitzer, Sagi Hoffman, Azik Nativ, Omri Freifeld, Yuval Zreik, Rani Dotan, Zohar A. J Pers Med Article Purpose: to evaluate a unique subpopulation of radical prostatectomy (RP) candidates with “negative” prostate (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) imaging scans and to characterize the clinical implications of misleading findings. Materials and Methods: This case-control retrospective study compared the final histological outcomes of patients with “negative” pre-RP PSMA PET/CT prostate scans (with a prostate maximal standardized uptake value [SUVmax] below the physiologic uptake) to those with an “intense” prostatic tracer uptake (with a SUVmax above the physiologic uptake). The patients underwent an RP between March 2015 and July 2019 in five academic centers. Data on the demographics, comorbidities, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and rectal exam findings, prior biopsies, imaging results, biopsies, and RP histology results were collected. Results: Ninety-seven of the 392 patients who underwent an RP had PSMA PET/CT imaging preoperatively. Fifty-two (54%) had a “negative” uptake (in the study group), and 45 (46%) had a “positive” uptake (in the control group). Only the lesion size and SUVmax values on the PSMA PET/CT differed between the groups preoperatively. On the histological analysis, only the ISUP score, seminal vesicles invasion, T stage, and positive margin rates differed between the groups (p < 0.05), while 50 (96%) study group patients harbored clinically significant disease (ISUP ≥ 2), with an extra-prostatic disease in 24 (46%), perineural invasion in 35 (67%), and positive lymph nodes in 4 (8%). Conclusions: Disease aggressiveness generally correlated with an intense PSMA uptake on the preoperative PSMA PET/CT, but a subpopulation of patients with clinically significant cancer and aggressive characteristics showed a deceptively weak PSMA uptake. These data raise a concern about the unqualified application of PSMA PET/CT for staging RP candidates. MDPI 2022-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8951096/ /pubmed/35330410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030410 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rosenzweig, Barak
Haramaty, Rennen
Davidson, Tima
Lazarovich, Alon
Shvero, Asaf
Haifler, Miki
Gal, Jonathan
Golan, Shay
Shpitzer, Sagi
Hoffman, Azik
Nativ, Omri
Freifeld, Yuval
Zreik, Rani
Dotan, Zohar A.
Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates
title Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates
title_full Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates
title_fullStr Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates
title_full_unstemmed Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates
title_short Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates
title_sort very low prostate pet/ct psma uptake may be misleading in staging radical prostatectomy candidates
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951096/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030410
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenzweigbarak verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT haramatyrennen verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT davidsontima verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT lazarovichalon verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT shveroasaf verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT haiflermiki verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT galjonathan verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT golanshay verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT shpitzersagi verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT hoffmanazik verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT nativomri verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT freifeldyuval verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT zreikrani verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates
AT dotanzohara verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates