Cargando…
Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates
Purpose: to evaluate a unique subpopulation of radical prostatectomy (RP) candidates with “negative” prostate (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) imaging scans and to characterize the clinical implications of misleading...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030410 |
_version_ | 1784675301529223168 |
---|---|
author | Rosenzweig, Barak Haramaty, Rennen Davidson, Tima Lazarovich, Alon Shvero, Asaf Haifler, Miki Gal, Jonathan Golan, Shay Shpitzer, Sagi Hoffman, Azik Nativ, Omri Freifeld, Yuval Zreik, Rani Dotan, Zohar A. |
author_facet | Rosenzweig, Barak Haramaty, Rennen Davidson, Tima Lazarovich, Alon Shvero, Asaf Haifler, Miki Gal, Jonathan Golan, Shay Shpitzer, Sagi Hoffman, Azik Nativ, Omri Freifeld, Yuval Zreik, Rani Dotan, Zohar A. |
author_sort | Rosenzweig, Barak |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: to evaluate a unique subpopulation of radical prostatectomy (RP) candidates with “negative” prostate (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) imaging scans and to characterize the clinical implications of misleading findings. Materials and Methods: This case-control retrospective study compared the final histological outcomes of patients with “negative” pre-RP PSMA PET/CT prostate scans (with a prostate maximal standardized uptake value [SUVmax] below the physiologic uptake) to those with an “intense” prostatic tracer uptake (with a SUVmax above the physiologic uptake). The patients underwent an RP between March 2015 and July 2019 in five academic centers. Data on the demographics, comorbidities, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and rectal exam findings, prior biopsies, imaging results, biopsies, and RP histology results were collected. Results: Ninety-seven of the 392 patients who underwent an RP had PSMA PET/CT imaging preoperatively. Fifty-two (54%) had a “negative” uptake (in the study group), and 45 (46%) had a “positive” uptake (in the control group). Only the lesion size and SUVmax values on the PSMA PET/CT differed between the groups preoperatively. On the histological analysis, only the ISUP score, seminal vesicles invasion, T stage, and positive margin rates differed between the groups (p < 0.05), while 50 (96%) study group patients harbored clinically significant disease (ISUP ≥ 2), with an extra-prostatic disease in 24 (46%), perineural invasion in 35 (67%), and positive lymph nodes in 4 (8%). Conclusions: Disease aggressiveness generally correlated with an intense PSMA uptake on the preoperative PSMA PET/CT, but a subpopulation of patients with clinically significant cancer and aggressive characteristics showed a deceptively weak PSMA uptake. These data raise a concern about the unqualified application of PSMA PET/CT for staging RP candidates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8951096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89510962022-03-26 Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates Rosenzweig, Barak Haramaty, Rennen Davidson, Tima Lazarovich, Alon Shvero, Asaf Haifler, Miki Gal, Jonathan Golan, Shay Shpitzer, Sagi Hoffman, Azik Nativ, Omri Freifeld, Yuval Zreik, Rani Dotan, Zohar A. J Pers Med Article Purpose: to evaluate a unique subpopulation of radical prostatectomy (RP) candidates with “negative” prostate (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) imaging scans and to characterize the clinical implications of misleading findings. Materials and Methods: This case-control retrospective study compared the final histological outcomes of patients with “negative” pre-RP PSMA PET/CT prostate scans (with a prostate maximal standardized uptake value [SUVmax] below the physiologic uptake) to those with an “intense” prostatic tracer uptake (with a SUVmax above the physiologic uptake). The patients underwent an RP between March 2015 and July 2019 in five academic centers. Data on the demographics, comorbidities, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and rectal exam findings, prior biopsies, imaging results, biopsies, and RP histology results were collected. Results: Ninety-seven of the 392 patients who underwent an RP had PSMA PET/CT imaging preoperatively. Fifty-two (54%) had a “negative” uptake (in the study group), and 45 (46%) had a “positive” uptake (in the control group). Only the lesion size and SUVmax values on the PSMA PET/CT differed between the groups preoperatively. On the histological analysis, only the ISUP score, seminal vesicles invasion, T stage, and positive margin rates differed between the groups (p < 0.05), while 50 (96%) study group patients harbored clinically significant disease (ISUP ≥ 2), with an extra-prostatic disease in 24 (46%), perineural invasion in 35 (67%), and positive lymph nodes in 4 (8%). Conclusions: Disease aggressiveness generally correlated with an intense PSMA uptake on the preoperative PSMA PET/CT, but a subpopulation of patients with clinically significant cancer and aggressive characteristics showed a deceptively weak PSMA uptake. These data raise a concern about the unqualified application of PSMA PET/CT for staging RP candidates. MDPI 2022-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8951096/ /pubmed/35330410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030410 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rosenzweig, Barak Haramaty, Rennen Davidson, Tima Lazarovich, Alon Shvero, Asaf Haifler, Miki Gal, Jonathan Golan, Shay Shpitzer, Sagi Hoffman, Azik Nativ, Omri Freifeld, Yuval Zreik, Rani Dotan, Zohar A. Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates |
title | Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates |
title_full | Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates |
title_fullStr | Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates |
title_full_unstemmed | Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates |
title_short | Very Low Prostate PET/CT PSMA Uptake May Be Misleading in Staging Radical Prostatectomy Candidates |
title_sort | very low prostate pet/ct psma uptake may be misleading in staging radical prostatectomy candidates |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm12030410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenzweigbarak verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT haramatyrennen verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT davidsontima verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT lazarovichalon verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT shveroasaf verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT haiflermiki verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT galjonathan verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT golanshay verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT shpitzersagi verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT hoffmanazik verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT nativomri verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT freifeldyuval verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT zreikrani verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates AT dotanzohara verylowprostatepetctpsmauptakemaybemisleadinginstagingradicalprostatectomycandidates |