Cargando…

An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis

Malaria is a globally widespread disease caused by parasitic protozoa transmitted to humans by infected female mosquitoes of Anopheles. It is caused in humans only by the parasite Plasmodium, further classified into four different species. Identifying malaria parasites is possible by analysing digit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loddo, Andrea, Fadda, Corrado, Di Ruberto, Cecilia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35324621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8030066
_version_ 1784675335050100736
author Loddo, Andrea
Fadda, Corrado
Di Ruberto, Cecilia
author_facet Loddo, Andrea
Fadda, Corrado
Di Ruberto, Cecilia
author_sort Loddo, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Malaria is a globally widespread disease caused by parasitic protozoa transmitted to humans by infected female mosquitoes of Anopheles. It is caused in humans only by the parasite Plasmodium, further classified into four different species. Identifying malaria parasites is possible by analysing digital microscopic blood smears, which is tedious, time-consuming and error prone. So, automation of the process has assumed great importance as it helps the laborious manual process of review and diagnosis. This work focuses on deep learning-based models, by comparing off-the-shelf architectures for classifying healthy and parasite-affected cells, by investigating the four-class classification on the Plasmodium falciparum stages of life and, finally, by evaluating the robustness of the models with cross-dataset experiments on two different datasets. The main contributions to the research in this field can be resumed as follows: (i) comparing off-the-shelf architectures in the task of classifying healthy and parasite-affected cells, (ii) investigating the four-class classification on the P. falciparum stages of life and (iii) evaluating the robustness of the models with cross-dataset experiments. Eleven well-known convolutional neural networks on two public datasets have been exploited. The results show that the networks have great accuracy in binary classification, even though they lack few samples per class. Moreover, the cross-dataset experiments exhibit the need for some further regulations. In particular, ResNet-18 achieved up to 97.68% accuracy in the binary classification, while DenseNet-201 reached 99.40% accuracy on the multiclass classification. The cross-dataset experiments exhibit the limitations of deep learning approaches in such a scenario, even though combining the two datasets permitted DenseNet-201 to reach 97.45% accuracy. Naturally, this needs further investigation to improve the robustness. In general, DenseNet-201 seems to offer the most stable and robust performance, offering as a crucial candidate to further developments and modifications. Moreover, the mobile-oriented architectures showed promising and satisfactory performance in the classification of malaria parasites. The obtained results enable extensive improvements, specifically oriented to the application of object detectors for type and stage of life recognition, even in mobile environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8951236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89512362022-03-26 An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis Loddo, Andrea Fadda, Corrado Di Ruberto, Cecilia J Imaging Article Malaria is a globally widespread disease caused by parasitic protozoa transmitted to humans by infected female mosquitoes of Anopheles. It is caused in humans only by the parasite Plasmodium, further classified into four different species. Identifying malaria parasites is possible by analysing digital microscopic blood smears, which is tedious, time-consuming and error prone. So, automation of the process has assumed great importance as it helps the laborious manual process of review and diagnosis. This work focuses on deep learning-based models, by comparing off-the-shelf architectures for classifying healthy and parasite-affected cells, by investigating the four-class classification on the Plasmodium falciparum stages of life and, finally, by evaluating the robustness of the models with cross-dataset experiments on two different datasets. The main contributions to the research in this field can be resumed as follows: (i) comparing off-the-shelf architectures in the task of classifying healthy and parasite-affected cells, (ii) investigating the four-class classification on the P. falciparum stages of life and (iii) evaluating the robustness of the models with cross-dataset experiments. Eleven well-known convolutional neural networks on two public datasets have been exploited. The results show that the networks have great accuracy in binary classification, even though they lack few samples per class. Moreover, the cross-dataset experiments exhibit the need for some further regulations. In particular, ResNet-18 achieved up to 97.68% accuracy in the binary classification, while DenseNet-201 reached 99.40% accuracy on the multiclass classification. The cross-dataset experiments exhibit the limitations of deep learning approaches in such a scenario, even though combining the two datasets permitted DenseNet-201 to reach 97.45% accuracy. Naturally, this needs further investigation to improve the robustness. In general, DenseNet-201 seems to offer the most stable and robust performance, offering as a crucial candidate to further developments and modifications. Moreover, the mobile-oriented architectures showed promising and satisfactory performance in the classification of malaria parasites. The obtained results enable extensive improvements, specifically oriented to the application of object detectors for type and stage of life recognition, even in mobile environments. MDPI 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8951236/ /pubmed/35324621 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8030066 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Loddo, Andrea
Fadda, Corrado
Di Ruberto, Cecilia
An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis
title An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis
title_full An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis
title_fullStr An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis
title_short An Empirical Evaluation of Convolutional Networks for Malaria Diagnosis
title_sort empirical evaluation of convolutional networks for malaria diagnosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35324621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8030066
work_keys_str_mv AT loddoandrea anempiricalevaluationofconvolutionalnetworksformalariadiagnosis
AT faddacorrado anempiricalevaluationofconvolutionalnetworksformalariadiagnosis
AT dirubertocecilia anempiricalevaluationofconvolutionalnetworksformalariadiagnosis
AT loddoandrea empiricalevaluationofconvolutionalnetworksformalariadiagnosis
AT faddacorrado empiricalevaluationofconvolutionalnetworksformalariadiagnosis
AT dirubertocecilia empiricalevaluationofconvolutionalnetworksformalariadiagnosis