Cargando…

Determinants of Different Aspects of Upper-Limb Activity after Stroke

We examined factors associated with different aspects of upper-limb (UL) activity in chronic stroke to better understand and improve UL activity in daily life. Three different aspects of UL activity were represented by four sensor measures: (1) contribution to activity according to activity ratio an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Essers, Bea, Biering Lundquist, Camilla, Verheyden, Geert, Brunner, Iris Charlotte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35336443
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22062273
_version_ 1784675362976825344
author Essers, Bea
Biering Lundquist, Camilla
Verheyden, Geert
Brunner, Iris Charlotte
author_facet Essers, Bea
Biering Lundquist, Camilla
Verheyden, Geert
Brunner, Iris Charlotte
author_sort Essers, Bea
collection PubMed
description We examined factors associated with different aspects of upper-limb (UL) activity in chronic stroke to better understand and improve UL activity in daily life. Three different aspects of UL activity were represented by four sensor measures: (1) contribution to activity according to activity ratio and magnitude ratio, (2) intensity of activity according to bilateral magnitude, and (3) variability of activity according to variation ratio. We combined data from a Belgian and Danish patient cohort (n = 126) and developed four models to determine associated factors for each sensor measure. Results from standard multiple regression show that motor impairment (Fugl–Meyer assessment) accounted for the largest part of the explained variance in all sensor measures (18–61%), with less motor impairment resulting in higher UL activity values (p < 0.001). Higher activity ratio, magnitude ratio, and variation ratio were further explained by having the dominant hand affected (p < 0.007). Bilateral magnitude had the lowest explained variance (adjusted R(2) = 0.376), and higher values were further associated with being young and female. As motor impairment and biological aspects accounted for only one- to two-thirds of the variance in UL activity, rehabilitation including behavioral strategies might be important to increase the different aspects of UL activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8951346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89513462022-03-26 Determinants of Different Aspects of Upper-Limb Activity after Stroke Essers, Bea Biering Lundquist, Camilla Verheyden, Geert Brunner, Iris Charlotte Sensors (Basel) Article We examined factors associated with different aspects of upper-limb (UL) activity in chronic stroke to better understand and improve UL activity in daily life. Three different aspects of UL activity were represented by four sensor measures: (1) contribution to activity according to activity ratio and magnitude ratio, (2) intensity of activity according to bilateral magnitude, and (3) variability of activity according to variation ratio. We combined data from a Belgian and Danish patient cohort (n = 126) and developed four models to determine associated factors for each sensor measure. Results from standard multiple regression show that motor impairment (Fugl–Meyer assessment) accounted for the largest part of the explained variance in all sensor measures (18–61%), with less motor impairment resulting in higher UL activity values (p < 0.001). Higher activity ratio, magnitude ratio, and variation ratio were further explained by having the dominant hand affected (p < 0.007). Bilateral magnitude had the lowest explained variance (adjusted R(2) = 0.376), and higher values were further associated with being young and female. As motor impairment and biological aspects accounted for only one- to two-thirds of the variance in UL activity, rehabilitation including behavioral strategies might be important to increase the different aspects of UL activity. MDPI 2022-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8951346/ /pubmed/35336443 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22062273 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Essers, Bea
Biering Lundquist, Camilla
Verheyden, Geert
Brunner, Iris Charlotte
Determinants of Different Aspects of Upper-Limb Activity after Stroke
title Determinants of Different Aspects of Upper-Limb Activity after Stroke
title_full Determinants of Different Aspects of Upper-Limb Activity after Stroke
title_fullStr Determinants of Different Aspects of Upper-Limb Activity after Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of Different Aspects of Upper-Limb Activity after Stroke
title_short Determinants of Different Aspects of Upper-Limb Activity after Stroke
title_sort determinants of different aspects of upper-limb activity after stroke
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35336443
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22062273
work_keys_str_mv AT essersbea determinantsofdifferentaspectsofupperlimbactivityafterstroke
AT bieringlundquistcamilla determinantsofdifferentaspectsofupperlimbactivityafterstroke
AT verheydengeert determinantsofdifferentaspectsofupperlimbactivityafterstroke
AT brunneririscharlotte determinantsofdifferentaspectsofupperlimbactivityafterstroke