Cargando…

Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods

The properties of composite materials are highly dependent on the fiber and matrix fraction and on the porosity resulting from micro voids. This paper addresses void content characterization and the constituent content of composite materials by resorting to a comparison of destructive and non-destru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elkolali, Moustafa, Nogueira, Liebert Parreiras, Rønning, Per Ola, Alcocer, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35335544
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14061212
_version_ 1784675383458660352
author Elkolali, Moustafa
Nogueira, Liebert Parreiras
Rønning, Per Ola
Alcocer, Alex
author_facet Elkolali, Moustafa
Nogueira, Liebert Parreiras
Rønning, Per Ola
Alcocer, Alex
author_sort Elkolali, Moustafa
collection PubMed
description The properties of composite materials are highly dependent on the fiber and matrix fraction and on the porosity resulting from micro voids. This paper addresses void content characterization and the constituent content of composite materials by resorting to a comparison of destructive and non-destructive methods. The work presents the detailed procedures of two destructive methods, using acid digestion of epoxy resins matrices, and compares their processes. It also presents the results of a non-destructive method, by means of Micro Computed Tomography (MicroCT). The results of both destructive and non-destructive methods are compared, and a recommendation is made based on the application and the type of composite being analyzed. The MicroCT showed better and more consistent results in detecting voids in the material, while the acid digestion tests provided better results about the fiber and matrix percentage. Exported results from the MicroCT scanning with actual locations of voids were used in numerical analysis, to examine the feasibility of using them, whether by developing models that map damage in the proximity of the void, or by developing models that predict the properties of the entire material with respect to the content, shape, and distribution in the material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8951427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89514272022-03-26 Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods Elkolali, Moustafa Nogueira, Liebert Parreiras Rønning, Per Ola Alcocer, Alex Polymers (Basel) Article The properties of composite materials are highly dependent on the fiber and matrix fraction and on the porosity resulting from micro voids. This paper addresses void content characterization and the constituent content of composite materials by resorting to a comparison of destructive and non-destructive methods. The work presents the detailed procedures of two destructive methods, using acid digestion of epoxy resins matrices, and compares their processes. It also presents the results of a non-destructive method, by means of Micro Computed Tomography (MicroCT). The results of both destructive and non-destructive methods are compared, and a recommendation is made based on the application and the type of composite being analyzed. The MicroCT showed better and more consistent results in detecting voids in the material, while the acid digestion tests provided better results about the fiber and matrix percentage. Exported results from the MicroCT scanning with actual locations of voids were used in numerical analysis, to examine the feasibility of using them, whether by developing models that map damage in the proximity of the void, or by developing models that predict the properties of the entire material with respect to the content, shape, and distribution in the material. MDPI 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8951427/ /pubmed/35335544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14061212 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Elkolali, Moustafa
Nogueira, Liebert Parreiras
Rønning, Per Ola
Alcocer, Alex
Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods
title Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods
title_full Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods
title_fullStr Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods
title_full_unstemmed Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods
title_short Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods
title_sort void content determination of carbon fiber reinforced polymers: a comparison between destructive and non-destructive methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35335544
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14061212
work_keys_str_mv AT elkolalimoustafa voidcontentdeterminationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersacomparisonbetweendestructiveandnondestructivemethods
AT nogueiraliebertparreiras voidcontentdeterminationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersacomparisonbetweendestructiveandnondestructivemethods
AT rønningperola voidcontentdeterminationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersacomparisonbetweendestructiveandnondestructivemethods
AT alcoceralex voidcontentdeterminationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersacomparisonbetweendestructiveandnondestructivemethods