Cargando…
Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods
The properties of composite materials are highly dependent on the fiber and matrix fraction and on the porosity resulting from micro voids. This paper addresses void content characterization and the constituent content of composite materials by resorting to a comparison of destructive and non-destru...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35335544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14061212 |
_version_ | 1784675383458660352 |
---|---|
author | Elkolali, Moustafa Nogueira, Liebert Parreiras Rønning, Per Ola Alcocer, Alex |
author_facet | Elkolali, Moustafa Nogueira, Liebert Parreiras Rønning, Per Ola Alcocer, Alex |
author_sort | Elkolali, Moustafa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The properties of composite materials are highly dependent on the fiber and matrix fraction and on the porosity resulting from micro voids. This paper addresses void content characterization and the constituent content of composite materials by resorting to a comparison of destructive and non-destructive methods. The work presents the detailed procedures of two destructive methods, using acid digestion of epoxy resins matrices, and compares their processes. It also presents the results of a non-destructive method, by means of Micro Computed Tomography (MicroCT). The results of both destructive and non-destructive methods are compared, and a recommendation is made based on the application and the type of composite being analyzed. The MicroCT showed better and more consistent results in detecting voids in the material, while the acid digestion tests provided better results about the fiber and matrix percentage. Exported results from the MicroCT scanning with actual locations of voids were used in numerical analysis, to examine the feasibility of using them, whether by developing models that map damage in the proximity of the void, or by developing models that predict the properties of the entire material with respect to the content, shape, and distribution in the material. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8951427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89514272022-03-26 Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods Elkolali, Moustafa Nogueira, Liebert Parreiras Rønning, Per Ola Alcocer, Alex Polymers (Basel) Article The properties of composite materials are highly dependent on the fiber and matrix fraction and on the porosity resulting from micro voids. This paper addresses void content characterization and the constituent content of composite materials by resorting to a comparison of destructive and non-destructive methods. The work presents the detailed procedures of two destructive methods, using acid digestion of epoxy resins matrices, and compares their processes. It also presents the results of a non-destructive method, by means of Micro Computed Tomography (MicroCT). The results of both destructive and non-destructive methods are compared, and a recommendation is made based on the application and the type of composite being analyzed. The MicroCT showed better and more consistent results in detecting voids in the material, while the acid digestion tests provided better results about the fiber and matrix percentage. Exported results from the MicroCT scanning with actual locations of voids were used in numerical analysis, to examine the feasibility of using them, whether by developing models that map damage in the proximity of the void, or by developing models that predict the properties of the entire material with respect to the content, shape, and distribution in the material. MDPI 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8951427/ /pubmed/35335544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14061212 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Elkolali, Moustafa Nogueira, Liebert Parreiras Rønning, Per Ola Alcocer, Alex Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods |
title | Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods |
title_full | Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods |
title_fullStr | Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods |
title_short | Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods |
title_sort | void content determination of carbon fiber reinforced polymers: a comparison between destructive and non-destructive methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8951427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35335544 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14061212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elkolalimoustafa voidcontentdeterminationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersacomparisonbetweendestructiveandnondestructivemethods AT nogueiraliebertparreiras voidcontentdeterminationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersacomparisonbetweendestructiveandnondestructivemethods AT rønningperola voidcontentdeterminationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersacomparisonbetweendestructiveandnondestructivemethods AT alcoceralex voidcontentdeterminationofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolymersacomparisonbetweendestructiveandnondestructivemethods |