Cargando…

Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison

BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment of early-stage arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the treatment effect, including variability, and feasibility of a multimodal physical therapy program as compared to manipulation under anesthesia. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rauzi, Michelle R., Foran, Jared R. H., Bade, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35337388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01026-y
_version_ 1784675757891518464
author Rauzi, Michelle R.
Foran, Jared R. H.
Bade, Michael J.
author_facet Rauzi, Michelle R.
Foran, Jared R. H.
Bade, Michael J.
author_sort Rauzi, Michelle R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment of early-stage arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the treatment effect, including variability, and feasibility of a multimodal physical therapy program as compared to manipulation under anesthesia. METHODS: This was a prospective feasibility study with a retrospective cohort comparison. Ten consecutive patients (aged 64 ± 9 years, 7 females) with early-stage arthrofibrosis were enrolled 6 weeks after primary total knee arthroplasty and participated in the multimodal physical therapy program. The multimodal physical therapy program consisted of manual therapy, therapeutic exercise, and static progressive splinting delivered over 4 weeks. The outcomes included knee range of motion (ROM), adherence, patient satisfaction, and safety. Data were compared to a retrospective cohort of 31 patients with arthrofibrosis (aged 65 ± 9 years, 20 females) who underwent manipulation under anesthesia followed by physical therapy. RESULTS: Overall, knee ROM outcomes were similar between multimodal physical therapy (110° ± 14) and manipulation under anesthesia (109° ± 11). Seven out of ten patients achieved functional ROM (≥ 110°) and avoided manipulation under anesthesia with the multimodal physical therapy program. Three out of 10 multimodal physical therapy patients required manipulation under anesthesia secondary to failure to demonstrate progress within 4 weeks of the multimodal physical therapy program. Adherence to the multimodal physical therapy program was 87 ± 9%. The median patient satisfaction with the multimodal physical therapy program was “very satisfied.” Safety concerns were minimal. CONCLUSION: The use of the multimodal physical therapy program is feasible for treating early-stage arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty, with 70% of patients avoiding manipulation under anesthesia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the efficacy of the multimodal physical therapy program and to determine the optimal patient selection for the multimodal physical therapy program versus manipulation under anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04837872. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-01026-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8953056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89530562022-03-26 Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison Rauzi, Michelle R. Foran, Jared R. H. Bade, Michael J. Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment of early-stage arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty is unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the treatment effect, including variability, and feasibility of a multimodal physical therapy program as compared to manipulation under anesthesia. METHODS: This was a prospective feasibility study with a retrospective cohort comparison. Ten consecutive patients (aged 64 ± 9 years, 7 females) with early-stage arthrofibrosis were enrolled 6 weeks after primary total knee arthroplasty and participated in the multimodal physical therapy program. The multimodal physical therapy program consisted of manual therapy, therapeutic exercise, and static progressive splinting delivered over 4 weeks. The outcomes included knee range of motion (ROM), adherence, patient satisfaction, and safety. Data were compared to a retrospective cohort of 31 patients with arthrofibrosis (aged 65 ± 9 years, 20 females) who underwent manipulation under anesthesia followed by physical therapy. RESULTS: Overall, knee ROM outcomes were similar between multimodal physical therapy (110° ± 14) and manipulation under anesthesia (109° ± 11). Seven out of ten patients achieved functional ROM (≥ 110°) and avoided manipulation under anesthesia with the multimodal physical therapy program. Three out of 10 multimodal physical therapy patients required manipulation under anesthesia secondary to failure to demonstrate progress within 4 weeks of the multimodal physical therapy program. Adherence to the multimodal physical therapy program was 87 ± 9%. The median patient satisfaction with the multimodal physical therapy program was “very satisfied.” Safety concerns were minimal. CONCLUSION: The use of the multimodal physical therapy program is feasible for treating early-stage arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty, with 70% of patients avoiding manipulation under anesthesia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the efficacy of the multimodal physical therapy program and to determine the optimal patient selection for the multimodal physical therapy program versus manipulation under anesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04837872. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-01026-y. BioMed Central 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8953056/ /pubmed/35337388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01026-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rauzi, Michelle R.
Foran, Jared R. H.
Bade, Michael J.
Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison
title Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison
title_full Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison
title_fullStr Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison
title_short Multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison
title_sort multimodal conservative management of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty compared to manipulation under anesthesia: a feasibility study with retrospective cohort comparison
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35337388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-022-01026-y
work_keys_str_mv AT rauzimicheller multimodalconservativemanagementofarthrofibrosisaftertotalkneearthroplastycomparedtomanipulationunderanesthesiaafeasibilitystudywithretrospectivecohortcomparison
AT foranjaredrh multimodalconservativemanagementofarthrofibrosisaftertotalkneearthroplastycomparedtomanipulationunderanesthesiaafeasibilitystudywithretrospectivecohortcomparison
AT bademichaelj multimodalconservativemanagementofarthrofibrosisaftertotalkneearthroplastycomparedtomanipulationunderanesthesiaafeasibilitystudywithretrospectivecohortcomparison