Cargando…

Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms

Recent evidence suggesting that object detection is improved following valid rather than invalid labels implies that semantics influence object detection. It is not clear, however, whether the results index object detection or feature detection. Further, because control conditions were absent and la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skocypec, Rachel M., Peterson, Mary A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35324604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6010019
_version_ 1784675894563962880
author Skocypec, Rachel M.
Peterson, Mary A.
author_facet Skocypec, Rachel M.
Peterson, Mary A.
author_sort Skocypec, Rachel M.
collection PubMed
description Recent evidence suggesting that object detection is improved following valid rather than invalid labels implies that semantics influence object detection. It is not clear, however, whether the results index object detection or feature detection. Further, because control conditions were absent and labels and objects were repeated multiple times, the mechanisms are unknown. We assessed object detection via figure assignment, whereby objects are segmented from backgrounds. Masked bipartite displays depicting a portion of a mono-oriented object (a familiar configuration) on one side of a central border were shown once only for 90 or 100 ms. Familiar configuration is a figural prior. Accurate detection was indexed by reports of an object on the familiar configuration side of the border. Compared to control experiments without labels, valid labels improved accuracy and reduced response times (RTs) more for upright than inverted objects (Studies 1 and 2). Invalid labels denoting different superordinate-level objects (DSC; Study 1) or same superordinate-level objects (SSC; Study 2) reduced accuracy for upright displays only. Orientation dependency indicates that effects are mediated by activated object representations rather than features which are invariant over orientation. Following invalid SSC labels (Study 2), accurate detection RTs were longer than control for both orientations, implicating conflict between semantic representations that had to be resolved before object detection. These results demonstrate that object detection is not just affected by semantics, it entails semantics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8953613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89536132022-03-26 Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms Skocypec, Rachel M. Peterson, Mary A. Vision (Basel) Article Recent evidence suggesting that object detection is improved following valid rather than invalid labels implies that semantics influence object detection. It is not clear, however, whether the results index object detection or feature detection. Further, because control conditions were absent and labels and objects were repeated multiple times, the mechanisms are unknown. We assessed object detection via figure assignment, whereby objects are segmented from backgrounds. Masked bipartite displays depicting a portion of a mono-oriented object (a familiar configuration) on one side of a central border were shown once only for 90 or 100 ms. Familiar configuration is a figural prior. Accurate detection was indexed by reports of an object on the familiar configuration side of the border. Compared to control experiments without labels, valid labels improved accuracy and reduced response times (RTs) more for upright than inverted objects (Studies 1 and 2). Invalid labels denoting different superordinate-level objects (DSC; Study 1) or same superordinate-level objects (SSC; Study 2) reduced accuracy for upright displays only. Orientation dependency indicates that effects are mediated by activated object representations rather than features which are invariant over orientation. Following invalid SSC labels (Study 2), accurate detection RTs were longer than control for both orientations, implicating conflict between semantic representations that had to be resolved before object detection. These results demonstrate that object detection is not just affected by semantics, it entails semantics. MDPI 2022-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8953613/ /pubmed/35324604 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6010019 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Skocypec, Rachel M.
Peterson, Mary A.
Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms
title Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms
title_full Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms
title_fullStr Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms
title_short Semantic Expectation Effects on Object Detection: Using Figure Assignment to Elucidate Mechanisms
title_sort semantic expectation effects on object detection: using figure assignment to elucidate mechanisms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35324604
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6010019
work_keys_str_mv AT skocypecrachelm semanticexpectationeffectsonobjectdetectionusingfigureassignmenttoelucidatemechanisms
AT petersonmarya semanticexpectationeffectsonobjectdetectionusingfigureassignmenttoelucidatemechanisms