Cargando…

Effect of Aeration Intensity on Performance of Lab-Scale Quorum-Quenching Membrane Bioreactor

Biofouling is one of the main drawbacks of membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Among the different methods, the quorum-quenching (QQ) technique is a novel method as it delays biofilm formation on the membrane surface through disruption of bacterial cell-to-cell communication and thus effectively mitigates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Islam, Zia Ul, Ayub, Mariam, Chung, Shinho, Oh, Heekyong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35323763
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030289
_version_ 1784675969998520320
author Islam, Zia Ul
Ayub, Mariam
Chung, Shinho
Oh, Heekyong
author_facet Islam, Zia Ul
Ayub, Mariam
Chung, Shinho
Oh, Heekyong
author_sort Islam, Zia Ul
collection PubMed
description Biofouling is one of the main drawbacks of membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Among the different methods, the quorum-quenching (QQ) technique is a novel method as it delays biofilm formation on the membrane surface through disruption of bacterial cell-to-cell communication and thus effectively mitigates membrane biofouling. QQ bacteria require a certain concentration of dissolved oxygen to show their best activities. Despite the importance of the amount of aeration, there have not been enough studies on aeration condition utilizing the separate determination of pure QQ effect and physical cleaning effect. This research aimed to find the optimum aeration intensity by separation of the two effects from QQ and physical cleaning. Three bead type conditions (no bead, vacant bead, and QQ beads) at three aeration intensities (1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 L/min representing low, medium, and high aeration intensity) were applied. From the results, no QQ effect and small QQ effect were observed at low and high aeration, while the greatest QQ effect (48.2% of 737 h improvement) was observed at medium aeration. The best performance was observed at high aeration with QQ beads having a 1536 h operational duration (303% improvement compared to the no bead condition); however, this excellent performance was attributed more to the physical cleaning effect than to the QQ effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8953932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89539322022-03-26 Effect of Aeration Intensity on Performance of Lab-Scale Quorum-Quenching Membrane Bioreactor Islam, Zia Ul Ayub, Mariam Chung, Shinho Oh, Heekyong Membranes (Basel) Article Biofouling is one of the main drawbacks of membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Among the different methods, the quorum-quenching (QQ) technique is a novel method as it delays biofilm formation on the membrane surface through disruption of bacterial cell-to-cell communication and thus effectively mitigates membrane biofouling. QQ bacteria require a certain concentration of dissolved oxygen to show their best activities. Despite the importance of the amount of aeration, there have not been enough studies on aeration condition utilizing the separate determination of pure QQ effect and physical cleaning effect. This research aimed to find the optimum aeration intensity by separation of the two effects from QQ and physical cleaning. Three bead type conditions (no bead, vacant bead, and QQ beads) at three aeration intensities (1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 L/min representing low, medium, and high aeration intensity) were applied. From the results, no QQ effect and small QQ effect were observed at low and high aeration, while the greatest QQ effect (48.2% of 737 h improvement) was observed at medium aeration. The best performance was observed at high aeration with QQ beads having a 1536 h operational duration (303% improvement compared to the no bead condition); however, this excellent performance was attributed more to the physical cleaning effect than to the QQ effect. MDPI 2022-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8953932/ /pubmed/35323763 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030289 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Islam, Zia Ul
Ayub, Mariam
Chung, Shinho
Oh, Heekyong
Effect of Aeration Intensity on Performance of Lab-Scale Quorum-Quenching Membrane Bioreactor
title Effect of Aeration Intensity on Performance of Lab-Scale Quorum-Quenching Membrane Bioreactor
title_full Effect of Aeration Intensity on Performance of Lab-Scale Quorum-Quenching Membrane Bioreactor
title_fullStr Effect of Aeration Intensity on Performance of Lab-Scale Quorum-Quenching Membrane Bioreactor
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Aeration Intensity on Performance of Lab-Scale Quorum-Quenching Membrane Bioreactor
title_short Effect of Aeration Intensity on Performance of Lab-Scale Quorum-Quenching Membrane Bioreactor
title_sort effect of aeration intensity on performance of lab-scale quorum-quenching membrane bioreactor
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35323763
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes12030289
work_keys_str_mv AT islamziaul effectofaerationintensityonperformanceoflabscalequorumquenchingmembranebioreactor
AT ayubmariam effectofaerationintensityonperformanceoflabscalequorumquenchingmembranebioreactor
AT chungshinho effectofaerationintensityonperformanceoflabscalequorumquenchingmembranebioreactor
AT ohheekyong effectofaerationintensityonperformanceoflabscalequorumquenchingmembranebioreactor