Cargando…
Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics
BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to expand testing for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens as the global community struggles to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Current diagnostic methods can be affected by supply chain bottlenecks and require the assistance of medical professionals, impedin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35337266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7 |
_version_ | 1784675978671292416 |
---|---|
author | Allicock, Orchid M. Petrone, Mary E. Yolda-Carr, Devyn Breban, Mallery Walsh, Hannah Watkins, Anne E. Rothman, Jessica E. Farhadian, Shelli F. Grubaugh, Nathan D. Wyllie, Anne L. |
author_facet | Allicock, Orchid M. Petrone, Mary E. Yolda-Carr, Devyn Breban, Mallery Walsh, Hannah Watkins, Anne E. Rothman, Jessica E. Farhadian, Shelli F. Grubaugh, Nathan D. Wyllie, Anne L. |
author_sort | Allicock, Orchid M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to expand testing for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens as the global community struggles to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Current diagnostic methods can be affected by supply chain bottlenecks and require the assistance of medical professionals, impeding the implementation of large-scale testing. Self-collection of saliva may solve these problems, as it can be completed without specialized training and uses generic materials. METHODS: We observed 30 individuals who self-collected saliva using four different collection devices and analyzed their feedback. Two of these devices, a funnel and bulb pipette, were used to evaluate at-home saliva collection by 60 individuals. SARS-CoV-2-spiked saliva samples were subjected to temperature cycles designed to simulate the conditions the samples might be exposed to during the summer and winter seasons and sensitivity of detection was evaluated. RESULTS: All devices enabled the safe, unsupervised self-collection of saliva. The quantity and quality of the samples received were acceptable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing, as determined by human RNase P detection. There was no significant difference in SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid gene (N1) detection between the freshly spiked samples and those incubated with the summer and winter profiles. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate inexpensive, generic, buffer free collection devices suitable for unsupervised and home saliva self-collection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8953967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89539672022-03-27 Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics Allicock, Orchid M. Petrone, Mary E. Yolda-Carr, Devyn Breban, Mallery Walsh, Hannah Watkins, Anne E. Rothman, Jessica E. Farhadian, Shelli F. Grubaugh, Nathan D. Wyllie, Anne L. BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to expand testing for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens as the global community struggles to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Current diagnostic methods can be affected by supply chain bottlenecks and require the assistance of medical professionals, impeding the implementation of large-scale testing. Self-collection of saliva may solve these problems, as it can be completed without specialized training and uses generic materials. METHODS: We observed 30 individuals who self-collected saliva using four different collection devices and analyzed their feedback. Two of these devices, a funnel and bulb pipette, were used to evaluate at-home saliva collection by 60 individuals. SARS-CoV-2-spiked saliva samples were subjected to temperature cycles designed to simulate the conditions the samples might be exposed to during the summer and winter seasons and sensitivity of detection was evaluated. RESULTS: All devices enabled the safe, unsupervised self-collection of saliva. The quantity and quality of the samples received were acceptable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing, as determined by human RNase P detection. There was no significant difference in SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid gene (N1) detection between the freshly spiked samples and those incubated with the summer and winter profiles. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate inexpensive, generic, buffer free collection devices suitable for unsupervised and home saliva self-collection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7. BioMed Central 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8953967/ /pubmed/35337266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Allicock, Orchid M. Petrone, Mary E. Yolda-Carr, Devyn Breban, Mallery Walsh, Hannah Watkins, Anne E. Rothman, Jessica E. Farhadian, Shelli F. Grubaugh, Nathan D. Wyllie, Anne L. Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics |
title | Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics |
title_full | Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics |
title_short | Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics |
title_sort | evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for sars-cov-2 diagnostics |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35337266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT allicockorchidm evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics AT petronemarye evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics AT yoldacarrdevyn evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics AT brebanmallery evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics AT walshhannah evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics AT watkinsannee evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics AT rothmanjessicae evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics AT farhadianshellif evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics AT grubaughnathand evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics AT wyllieannel evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics |