Cargando…

Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to expand testing for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens as the global community struggles to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Current diagnostic methods can be affected by supply chain bottlenecks and require the assistance of medical professionals, impedin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allicock, Orchid M., Petrone, Mary E., Yolda-Carr, Devyn, Breban, Mallery, Walsh, Hannah, Watkins, Anne E., Rothman, Jessica E., Farhadian, Shelli F., Grubaugh, Nathan D., Wyllie, Anne L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35337266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7
_version_ 1784675978671292416
author Allicock, Orchid M.
Petrone, Mary E.
Yolda-Carr, Devyn
Breban, Mallery
Walsh, Hannah
Watkins, Anne E.
Rothman, Jessica E.
Farhadian, Shelli F.
Grubaugh, Nathan D.
Wyllie, Anne L.
author_facet Allicock, Orchid M.
Petrone, Mary E.
Yolda-Carr, Devyn
Breban, Mallery
Walsh, Hannah
Watkins, Anne E.
Rothman, Jessica E.
Farhadian, Shelli F.
Grubaugh, Nathan D.
Wyllie, Anne L.
author_sort Allicock, Orchid M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to expand testing for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens as the global community struggles to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Current diagnostic methods can be affected by supply chain bottlenecks and require the assistance of medical professionals, impeding the implementation of large-scale testing. Self-collection of saliva may solve these problems, as it can be completed without specialized training and uses generic materials. METHODS: We observed 30 individuals who self-collected saliva using four different collection devices and analyzed their feedback. Two of these devices, a funnel and bulb pipette, were used to evaluate at-home saliva collection by 60 individuals. SARS-CoV-2-spiked saliva samples were subjected to temperature cycles designed to simulate the conditions the samples might be exposed to during the summer and winter seasons and sensitivity of detection was evaluated. RESULTS: All devices enabled the safe, unsupervised self-collection of saliva. The quantity and quality of the samples received were acceptable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing, as determined by human RNase P detection. There was no significant difference in SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid gene (N1) detection between the freshly spiked samples and those incubated with the summer and winter profiles. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate inexpensive, generic, buffer free collection devices suitable for unsupervised and home saliva self-collection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8953967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89539672022-03-27 Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics Allicock, Orchid M. Petrone, Mary E. Yolda-Carr, Devyn Breban, Mallery Walsh, Hannah Watkins, Anne E. Rothman, Jessica E. Farhadian, Shelli F. Grubaugh, Nathan D. Wyllie, Anne L. BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to expand testing for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens as the global community struggles to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Current diagnostic methods can be affected by supply chain bottlenecks and require the assistance of medical professionals, impeding the implementation of large-scale testing. Self-collection of saliva may solve these problems, as it can be completed without specialized training and uses generic materials. METHODS: We observed 30 individuals who self-collected saliva using four different collection devices and analyzed their feedback. Two of these devices, a funnel and bulb pipette, were used to evaluate at-home saliva collection by 60 individuals. SARS-CoV-2-spiked saliva samples were subjected to temperature cycles designed to simulate the conditions the samples might be exposed to during the summer and winter seasons and sensitivity of detection was evaluated. RESULTS: All devices enabled the safe, unsupervised self-collection of saliva. The quantity and quality of the samples received were acceptable for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing, as determined by human RNase P detection. There was no significant difference in SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid gene (N1) detection between the freshly spiked samples and those incubated with the summer and winter profiles. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate inexpensive, generic, buffer free collection devices suitable for unsupervised and home saliva self-collection. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7. BioMed Central 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8953967/ /pubmed/35337266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Allicock, Orchid M.
Petrone, Mary E.
Yolda-Carr, Devyn
Breban, Mallery
Walsh, Hannah
Watkins, Anne E.
Rothman, Jessica E.
Farhadian, Shelli F.
Grubaugh, Nathan D.
Wyllie, Anne L.
Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics
title Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics
title_full Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics
title_fullStr Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics
title_short Evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics
title_sort evaluation of saliva self-collection devices for sars-cov-2 diagnostics
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35337266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07285-7
work_keys_str_mv AT allicockorchidm evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics
AT petronemarye evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics
AT yoldacarrdevyn evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics
AT brebanmallery evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics
AT walshhannah evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics
AT watkinsannee evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics
AT rothmanjessicae evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics
AT farhadianshellif evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics
AT grubaughnathand evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics
AT wyllieannel evaluationofsalivaselfcollectiondevicesforsarscov2diagnostics