Cargando…

Successful Urgent TAVI for Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis after ECMO Implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved to be the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis and high perioperative risk. Cardiogenic shock is one of the most severe complications during the TAVI procedure, especially as the prognosis of cardiogenic shock seconda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niu, Ya-Lei, Mayr, Nicola Patrick, Chen, Yin-Hwa, Chang, Hsiao-Hwang, Wang, Shi-Pu, Lin, Hung-Yu, Pai, Ching-Chou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35334532
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030356
_version_ 1784675981337821184
author Niu, Ya-Lei
Mayr, Nicola Patrick
Chen, Yin-Hwa
Chang, Hsiao-Hwang
Wang, Shi-Pu
Lin, Hung-Yu
Pai, Ching-Chou
author_facet Niu, Ya-Lei
Mayr, Nicola Patrick
Chen, Yin-Hwa
Chang, Hsiao-Hwang
Wang, Shi-Pu
Lin, Hung-Yu
Pai, Ching-Chou
author_sort Niu, Ya-Lei
collection PubMed
description Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved to be the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis and high perioperative risk. Cardiogenic shock is one of the most severe complications during the TAVI procedure, especially as the prognosis of cardiogenic shock secondary to aortic stenosis is very poor. This situation can be challenging, while extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) can be a treatment option. Here, we reported on an 88-year-old female patient who had been diagnosed as non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and critical aortic valve stenosis (AS) with a logistic Euroscore of 25%. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) was performed smoothly and developed tachy-brady arrhythmia of atrial fibrillation then cardiac arrest at the beginning of the TAVI procedure. A v-a ECMO was installed at her left femoral side. Afterward, the TAVI procedure was completed accordingly; her consciousness recovered and Levosimendan therapy enhanced her left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 22% to 40%. Five days after TAVI, ECMO was replaced by intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) and it was removed 3 days later. A minor complication of this therapy, e.g., muscular weakness in her left leg, was noted. The patient underwent rehabilitation for about 2 months, and was discharged from hospital with a wheel chair and clear consciousness. At the 24 month follow-up she was in good recovery and was able to walk upstairs to the second floor again. Our experience suggests that one indication of prophylactic use of ECMO is for patients with an unstable hemodynamic condition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8953978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89539782022-03-26 Successful Urgent TAVI for Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis after ECMO Implantation Niu, Ya-Lei Mayr, Nicola Patrick Chen, Yin-Hwa Chang, Hsiao-Hwang Wang, Shi-Pu Lin, Hung-Yu Pai, Ching-Chou Medicina (Kaunas) Case Report Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved to be the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis and high perioperative risk. Cardiogenic shock is one of the most severe complications during the TAVI procedure, especially as the prognosis of cardiogenic shock secondary to aortic stenosis is very poor. This situation can be challenging, while extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) can be a treatment option. Here, we reported on an 88-year-old female patient who had been diagnosed as non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and critical aortic valve stenosis (AS) with a logistic Euroscore of 25%. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) was performed smoothly and developed tachy-brady arrhythmia of atrial fibrillation then cardiac arrest at the beginning of the TAVI procedure. A v-a ECMO was installed at her left femoral side. Afterward, the TAVI procedure was completed accordingly; her consciousness recovered and Levosimendan therapy enhanced her left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from 22% to 40%. Five days after TAVI, ECMO was replaced by intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) and it was removed 3 days later. A minor complication of this therapy, e.g., muscular weakness in her left leg, was noted. The patient underwent rehabilitation for about 2 months, and was discharged from hospital with a wheel chair and clear consciousness. At the 24 month follow-up she was in good recovery and was able to walk upstairs to the second floor again. Our experience suggests that one indication of prophylactic use of ECMO is for patients with an unstable hemodynamic condition. MDPI 2022-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8953978/ /pubmed/35334532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030356 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Niu, Ya-Lei
Mayr, Nicola Patrick
Chen, Yin-Hwa
Chang, Hsiao-Hwang
Wang, Shi-Pu
Lin, Hung-Yu
Pai, Ching-Chou
Successful Urgent TAVI for Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis after ECMO Implantation
title Successful Urgent TAVI for Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis after ECMO Implantation
title_full Successful Urgent TAVI for Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis after ECMO Implantation
title_fullStr Successful Urgent TAVI for Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis after ECMO Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Successful Urgent TAVI for Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis after ECMO Implantation
title_short Successful Urgent TAVI for Critical Aortic Valve Stenosis after ECMO Implantation
title_sort successful urgent tavi for critical aortic valve stenosis after ecmo implantation
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8953978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35334532
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030356
work_keys_str_mv AT niuyalei successfulurgenttaviforcriticalaorticvalvestenosisafterecmoimplantation
AT mayrnicolapatrick successfulurgenttaviforcriticalaorticvalvestenosisafterecmoimplantation
AT chenyinhwa successfulurgenttaviforcriticalaorticvalvestenosisafterecmoimplantation
AT changhsiaohwang successfulurgenttaviforcriticalaorticvalvestenosisafterecmoimplantation
AT wangshipu successfulurgenttaviforcriticalaorticvalvestenosisafterecmoimplantation
AT linhungyu successfulurgenttaviforcriticalaorticvalvestenosisafterecmoimplantation
AT paichingchou successfulurgenttaviforcriticalaorticvalvestenosisafterecmoimplantation