Cargando…

Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation

Herein, we report computational and experimental evaluations of the antimicrobial activity of twenty one 2,3-diaryl-thiazolidin-4-ones. All synthesized compounds exhibited an antibacterial activity against six Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to different extents. Thus, the MIC was in the ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tratrat, Christophe, Petrou, Anthi, Geronikaki, Athina, Ivanov, Marija, Kostić, Marina, Soković, Marina, Vizirianakis, Ioannis S., Theodoroula, Nikoleta F., Haroun, Michelyne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35335296
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061930
_version_ 1784676011932123136
author Tratrat, Christophe
Petrou, Anthi
Geronikaki, Athina
Ivanov, Marija
Kostić, Marina
Soković, Marina
Vizirianakis, Ioannis S.
Theodoroula, Nikoleta F.
Haroun, Michelyne
author_facet Tratrat, Christophe
Petrou, Anthi
Geronikaki, Athina
Ivanov, Marija
Kostić, Marina
Soković, Marina
Vizirianakis, Ioannis S.
Theodoroula, Nikoleta F.
Haroun, Michelyne
author_sort Tratrat, Christophe
collection PubMed
description Herein, we report computational and experimental evaluations of the antimicrobial activity of twenty one 2,3-diaryl-thiazolidin-4-ones. All synthesized compounds exhibited an antibacterial activity against six Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to different extents. Thus, the MIC was in the range of 0.008–0.24 mg/mL, while the MBC was 0.0016–0.48 mg/mL. The most sensitive bacterium was S. Typhimurium, whereas S. aureus was the most resistant. The best antibacterial activity was observed for compound 5 (MIC at 0.008–0.06 mg/mL). The three most active compounds 5, 8, and 15, as well as compound 6, which were evaluated against three resistant strains, MRSA, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli, were more potent against all bacterial strains used than ampicillin. The antifungal activity of some compounds exceeded or were equipotent with those of the reference antifungal agents bifonazole and ketoconazole. The best activity was expressed by compound 5. All compounds exhibited moderate to good drug-likeness scores ranging from −0.39 to 0.39. The docking studies indicated a probable involvement of E. coli Mur B inhibition in the antibacterial action, while CYP51 inhibition is likely responsible for the antifungal activity of the tested compounds. Finally, the assessment of cellular cytotoxicity of the compounds in normal human MRC-5 cells revealed that the compounds were not toxic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8954104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89541042022-03-26 Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation Tratrat, Christophe Petrou, Anthi Geronikaki, Athina Ivanov, Marija Kostić, Marina Soković, Marina Vizirianakis, Ioannis S. Theodoroula, Nikoleta F. Haroun, Michelyne Molecules Article Herein, we report computational and experimental evaluations of the antimicrobial activity of twenty one 2,3-diaryl-thiazolidin-4-ones. All synthesized compounds exhibited an antibacterial activity against six Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to different extents. Thus, the MIC was in the range of 0.008–0.24 mg/mL, while the MBC was 0.0016–0.48 mg/mL. The most sensitive bacterium was S. Typhimurium, whereas S. aureus was the most resistant. The best antibacterial activity was observed for compound 5 (MIC at 0.008–0.06 mg/mL). The three most active compounds 5, 8, and 15, as well as compound 6, which were evaluated against three resistant strains, MRSA, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli, were more potent against all bacterial strains used than ampicillin. The antifungal activity of some compounds exceeded or were equipotent with those of the reference antifungal agents bifonazole and ketoconazole. The best activity was expressed by compound 5. All compounds exhibited moderate to good drug-likeness scores ranging from −0.39 to 0.39. The docking studies indicated a probable involvement of E. coli Mur B inhibition in the antibacterial action, while CYP51 inhibition is likely responsible for the antifungal activity of the tested compounds. Finally, the assessment of cellular cytotoxicity of the compounds in normal human MRC-5 cells revealed that the compounds were not toxic. MDPI 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8954104/ /pubmed/35335296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061930 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tratrat, Christophe
Petrou, Anthi
Geronikaki, Athina
Ivanov, Marija
Kostić, Marina
Soković, Marina
Vizirianakis, Ioannis S.
Theodoroula, Nikoleta F.
Haroun, Michelyne
Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation
title Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation
title_full Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation
title_fullStr Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation
title_short Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation
title_sort thiazolidin-4-ones as potential antimicrobial agents: experimental and in silico evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35335296
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061930
work_keys_str_mv AT tratratchristophe thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation
AT petrouanthi thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation
AT geronikakiathina thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation
AT ivanovmarija thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation
AT kosticmarina thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation
AT sokovicmarina thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation
AT vizirianakisioanniss thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation
AT theodoroulanikoletaf thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation
AT harounmichelyne thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation