Cargando…
Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation
Herein, we report computational and experimental evaluations of the antimicrobial activity of twenty one 2,3-diaryl-thiazolidin-4-ones. All synthesized compounds exhibited an antibacterial activity against six Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to different extents. Thus, the MIC was in the ra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35335296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061930 |
_version_ | 1784676011932123136 |
---|---|
author | Tratrat, Christophe Petrou, Anthi Geronikaki, Athina Ivanov, Marija Kostić, Marina Soković, Marina Vizirianakis, Ioannis S. Theodoroula, Nikoleta F. Haroun, Michelyne |
author_facet | Tratrat, Christophe Petrou, Anthi Geronikaki, Athina Ivanov, Marija Kostić, Marina Soković, Marina Vizirianakis, Ioannis S. Theodoroula, Nikoleta F. Haroun, Michelyne |
author_sort | Tratrat, Christophe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Herein, we report computational and experimental evaluations of the antimicrobial activity of twenty one 2,3-diaryl-thiazolidin-4-ones. All synthesized compounds exhibited an antibacterial activity against six Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to different extents. Thus, the MIC was in the range of 0.008–0.24 mg/mL, while the MBC was 0.0016–0.48 mg/mL. The most sensitive bacterium was S. Typhimurium, whereas S. aureus was the most resistant. The best antibacterial activity was observed for compound 5 (MIC at 0.008–0.06 mg/mL). The three most active compounds 5, 8, and 15, as well as compound 6, which were evaluated against three resistant strains, MRSA, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli, were more potent against all bacterial strains used than ampicillin. The antifungal activity of some compounds exceeded or were equipotent with those of the reference antifungal agents bifonazole and ketoconazole. The best activity was expressed by compound 5. All compounds exhibited moderate to good drug-likeness scores ranging from −0.39 to 0.39. The docking studies indicated a probable involvement of E. coli Mur B inhibition in the antibacterial action, while CYP51 inhibition is likely responsible for the antifungal activity of the tested compounds. Finally, the assessment of cellular cytotoxicity of the compounds in normal human MRC-5 cells revealed that the compounds were not toxic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8954104 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89541042022-03-26 Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation Tratrat, Christophe Petrou, Anthi Geronikaki, Athina Ivanov, Marija Kostić, Marina Soković, Marina Vizirianakis, Ioannis S. Theodoroula, Nikoleta F. Haroun, Michelyne Molecules Article Herein, we report computational and experimental evaluations of the antimicrobial activity of twenty one 2,3-diaryl-thiazolidin-4-ones. All synthesized compounds exhibited an antibacterial activity against six Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria to different extents. Thus, the MIC was in the range of 0.008–0.24 mg/mL, while the MBC was 0.0016–0.48 mg/mL. The most sensitive bacterium was S. Typhimurium, whereas S. aureus was the most resistant. The best antibacterial activity was observed for compound 5 (MIC at 0.008–0.06 mg/mL). The three most active compounds 5, 8, and 15, as well as compound 6, which were evaluated against three resistant strains, MRSA, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli, were more potent against all bacterial strains used than ampicillin. The antifungal activity of some compounds exceeded or were equipotent with those of the reference antifungal agents bifonazole and ketoconazole. The best activity was expressed by compound 5. All compounds exhibited moderate to good drug-likeness scores ranging from −0.39 to 0.39. The docking studies indicated a probable involvement of E. coli Mur B inhibition in the antibacterial action, while CYP51 inhibition is likely responsible for the antifungal activity of the tested compounds. Finally, the assessment of cellular cytotoxicity of the compounds in normal human MRC-5 cells revealed that the compounds were not toxic. MDPI 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8954104/ /pubmed/35335296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061930 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tratrat, Christophe Petrou, Anthi Geronikaki, Athina Ivanov, Marija Kostić, Marina Soković, Marina Vizirianakis, Ioannis S. Theodoroula, Nikoleta F. Haroun, Michelyne Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation |
title | Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation |
title_full | Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation |
title_short | Thiazolidin-4-Ones as Potential Antimicrobial Agents: Experimental and In Silico Evaluation |
title_sort | thiazolidin-4-ones as potential antimicrobial agents: experimental and in silico evaluation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954104/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35335296 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061930 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tratratchristophe thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation AT petrouanthi thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation AT geronikakiathina thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation AT ivanovmarija thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation AT kosticmarina thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation AT sokovicmarina thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation AT vizirianakisioanniss thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation AT theodoroulanikoletaf thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation AT harounmichelyne thiazolidin4onesaspotentialantimicrobialagentsexperimentalandinsilicoevaluation |