Cargando…

Acute Ischemic Stroke in Children – Should We Thrombolyze?

Ischemic stroke is a major cause of acute neurological symptoms in children with significant long-term neurological sequelae. Unlike in the adult population, the clinical presentation of strokes in children may not be stereotyped. Hence, many other differential diagnostic possibilities might have to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vinayan, K. P., Nambiar, Vivek, Anand, Vaishakh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35342261
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_527_21
_version_ 1784676066622701568
author Vinayan, K. P.
Nambiar, Vivek
Anand, Vaishakh
author_facet Vinayan, K. P.
Nambiar, Vivek
Anand, Vaishakh
author_sort Vinayan, K. P.
collection PubMed
description Ischemic stroke is a major cause of acute neurological symptoms in children with significant long-term neurological sequelae. Unlike in the adult population, the clinical presentation of strokes in children may not be stereotyped. Hence, many other differential diagnostic possibilities might have to be considered in the emergency setting. Due to this heterogeneous presentation and the resultant clinical dilemma in the early detection, acute thrombolysis even now remains as a very rarely tried therapeutic option in children. Many case reports over these years have shown consistently good results of acute intravenous thrombolysis in children with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administered within the time frame. There are also some recent reports of endovascular interventions. However, unlike in the adult population, class 1 clinical studies and good Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are yet to emerge in children. The absence of age-appropriate safety and outcome data for the commonly used thrombolytic agents in children is another major roadblock for developing clinical guidelines and recommendations for this age group. The ambitious Thrombolysis in Pediatric Stroke (TIPS) trial had to be terminated prematurely due to poor patient enrolment. This review critically looks at the current status of the acute management of ischemic strokes in children with a specific emphasis on thrombolytic therapy. Until we have better evidence-based guidelines for this age group, it will be prudent to develop robust institutional pathways to provide this important intervention for all eligible children with acute strokes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8954325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89543252022-03-26 Acute Ischemic Stroke in Children – Should We Thrombolyze? Vinayan, K. P. Nambiar, Vivek Anand, Vaishakh Ann Indian Acad Neurol View Point Ischemic stroke is a major cause of acute neurological symptoms in children with significant long-term neurological sequelae. Unlike in the adult population, the clinical presentation of strokes in children may not be stereotyped. Hence, many other differential diagnostic possibilities might have to be considered in the emergency setting. Due to this heterogeneous presentation and the resultant clinical dilemma in the early detection, acute thrombolysis even now remains as a very rarely tried therapeutic option in children. Many case reports over these years have shown consistently good results of acute intravenous thrombolysis in children with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) administered within the time frame. There are also some recent reports of endovascular interventions. However, unlike in the adult population, class 1 clinical studies and good Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are yet to emerge in children. The absence of age-appropriate safety and outcome data for the commonly used thrombolytic agents in children is another major roadblock for developing clinical guidelines and recommendations for this age group. The ambitious Thrombolysis in Pediatric Stroke (TIPS) trial had to be terminated prematurely due to poor patient enrolment. This review critically looks at the current status of the acute management of ischemic strokes in children with a specific emphasis on thrombolytic therapy. Until we have better evidence-based guidelines for this age group, it will be prudent to develop robust institutional pathways to provide this important intervention for all eligible children with acute strokes. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8954325/ /pubmed/35342261 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_527_21 Text en Copyright: © 2006 - 2021 Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle View Point
Vinayan, K. P.
Nambiar, Vivek
Anand, Vaishakh
Acute Ischemic Stroke in Children – Should We Thrombolyze?
title Acute Ischemic Stroke in Children – Should We Thrombolyze?
title_full Acute Ischemic Stroke in Children – Should We Thrombolyze?
title_fullStr Acute Ischemic Stroke in Children – Should We Thrombolyze?
title_full_unstemmed Acute Ischemic Stroke in Children – Should We Thrombolyze?
title_short Acute Ischemic Stroke in Children – Should We Thrombolyze?
title_sort acute ischemic stroke in children – should we thrombolyze?
topic View Point
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35342261
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_527_21
work_keys_str_mv AT vinayankp acuteischemicstrokeinchildrenshouldwethrombolyze
AT nambiarvivek acuteischemicstrokeinchildrenshouldwethrombolyze
AT anandvaishakh acuteischemicstrokeinchildrenshouldwethrombolyze