Cargando…

Why Is the UAG (Amber) Stop Codon Almost Absent in Highly Expressed Bacterial Genes?

The genome hypothesis postulates that genes in a genome tend to conform to their species’ usage of the codon catalog and the GC content of the DNA. Thus, codon frequencies differ across organisms, including the three termination codons in the standard genetic code. Here, we analyze the frequencies o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belin, Dominique, Puigbò, Pere
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330182
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12030431
_version_ 1784676092630532096
author Belin, Dominique
Puigbò, Pere
author_facet Belin, Dominique
Puigbò, Pere
author_sort Belin, Dominique
collection PubMed
description The genome hypothesis postulates that genes in a genome tend to conform to their species’ usage of the codon catalog and the GC content of the DNA. Thus, codon frequencies differ across organisms, including the three termination codons in the standard genetic code. Here, we analyze the frequencies of stop codons in a group of highly expressed genes from 196 prokaryotes under strong translational selection. The occurrence of the three translation termination codons is highly biased, with UAA (ochre) being the most prevalent in almost all bacteria. In contrast, UAG (amber) is the least frequent termination codon, e.g., only 321 occurrences (7.4%) in E. coli K-12 substr. W3110. Of the 253 highly expressed genes, only two end with an UAG codon. The strength of the selective bias against UAG in highly expressed genes varies among bacterial genomes, but it is not affected by the GC content of these genomes. In contrast, increased GC content results in a decrease in UAA abundance with a concomitant increase in UGA abundance. We propose that readthrough efficiency and context effects could explain the prevalence of UAA over UAG, particularly in highly expressed genes. Findings from this communication can be utilized for the optimization of gene expression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8954436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89544362022-03-26 Why Is the UAG (Amber) Stop Codon Almost Absent in Highly Expressed Bacterial Genes? Belin, Dominique Puigbò, Pere Life (Basel) Communication The genome hypothesis postulates that genes in a genome tend to conform to their species’ usage of the codon catalog and the GC content of the DNA. Thus, codon frequencies differ across organisms, including the three termination codons in the standard genetic code. Here, we analyze the frequencies of stop codons in a group of highly expressed genes from 196 prokaryotes under strong translational selection. The occurrence of the three translation termination codons is highly biased, with UAA (ochre) being the most prevalent in almost all bacteria. In contrast, UAG (amber) is the least frequent termination codon, e.g., only 321 occurrences (7.4%) in E. coli K-12 substr. W3110. Of the 253 highly expressed genes, only two end with an UAG codon. The strength of the selective bias against UAG in highly expressed genes varies among bacterial genomes, but it is not affected by the GC content of these genomes. In contrast, increased GC content results in a decrease in UAA abundance with a concomitant increase in UGA abundance. We propose that readthrough efficiency and context effects could explain the prevalence of UAA over UAG, particularly in highly expressed genes. Findings from this communication can be utilized for the optimization of gene expression. MDPI 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8954436/ /pubmed/35330182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12030431 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Belin, Dominique
Puigbò, Pere
Why Is the UAG (Amber) Stop Codon Almost Absent in Highly Expressed Bacterial Genes?
title Why Is the UAG (Amber) Stop Codon Almost Absent in Highly Expressed Bacterial Genes?
title_full Why Is the UAG (Amber) Stop Codon Almost Absent in Highly Expressed Bacterial Genes?
title_fullStr Why Is the UAG (Amber) Stop Codon Almost Absent in Highly Expressed Bacterial Genes?
title_full_unstemmed Why Is the UAG (Amber) Stop Codon Almost Absent in Highly Expressed Bacterial Genes?
title_short Why Is the UAG (Amber) Stop Codon Almost Absent in Highly Expressed Bacterial Genes?
title_sort why is the uag (amber) stop codon almost absent in highly expressed bacterial genes?
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35330182
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life12030431
work_keys_str_mv AT belindominique whyistheuagamberstopcodonalmostabsentinhighlyexpressedbacterialgenes
AT puigbopere whyistheuagamberstopcodonalmostabsentinhighlyexpressedbacterialgenes