Cargando…

Assessment of Pumpkin Seed Oil Adulteration Supported by Multivariate Analysis: Comparison of GC-MS, Colourimetry and NIR Spectroscopy Data

Because of its high market value, pumpkin seed oil is occasionally adulterated by cheaper refined oils, usually sunflower oil. The standard method for detecting its authenticity is based on expensive and laborious determination of the sterol composition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balbino, Sandra, Vincek, Dragutin, Trtanj, Iva, Egređija, Dunja, Gajdoš-Kljusurić, Jasenka, Kraljić, Klara, Obranović, Marko, Škevin, Dubravka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35327258
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11060835
_version_ 1784676145860444160
author Balbino, Sandra
Vincek, Dragutin
Trtanj, Iva
Egređija, Dunja
Gajdoš-Kljusurić, Jasenka
Kraljić, Klara
Obranović, Marko
Škevin, Dubravka
author_facet Balbino, Sandra
Vincek, Dragutin
Trtanj, Iva
Egređija, Dunja
Gajdoš-Kljusurić, Jasenka
Kraljić, Klara
Obranović, Marko
Škevin, Dubravka
author_sort Balbino, Sandra
collection PubMed
description Because of its high market value, pumpkin seed oil is occasionally adulterated by cheaper refined oils, usually sunflower oil. The standard method for detecting its authenticity is based on expensive and laborious determination of the sterol composition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the sterol content and authenticity of retail oils labelled as pumpkin seed oil and also to investigate the potential of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) and colourimetry in detecting adulteration. The results show that due to the significant decrease in Δ7-sterols and increase in Δ5-sterols, 48% of the analysed oils can be declared as adulterated blends of pumpkin seed and sunflower oil. Significant differences in NIR spectroscopy data, in the range of 904–922 nm and 1675–1699 nm, and colourimetric data were found between the control pumpkin seed oil and sunflower oil, but only the NIR method had the potential to detect the authenticity of pumpkin seed oil, which was confirmed by principal component analysis. Orthogonal projection on latent structures (OPLS) discriminant analysis, resulted in working classification models that were able to discriminate pure and adulterated oil. OPLS models based on NIR spectra were also able to successfully predict the content of β-sitosterol and Δ7,22-stigmastadienol in the analysed oils.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8954646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89546462022-03-26 Assessment of Pumpkin Seed Oil Adulteration Supported by Multivariate Analysis: Comparison of GC-MS, Colourimetry and NIR Spectroscopy Data Balbino, Sandra Vincek, Dragutin Trtanj, Iva Egređija, Dunja Gajdoš-Kljusurić, Jasenka Kraljić, Klara Obranović, Marko Škevin, Dubravka Foods Article Because of its high market value, pumpkin seed oil is occasionally adulterated by cheaper refined oils, usually sunflower oil. The standard method for detecting its authenticity is based on expensive and laborious determination of the sterol composition. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the sterol content and authenticity of retail oils labelled as pumpkin seed oil and also to investigate the potential of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR) and colourimetry in detecting adulteration. The results show that due to the significant decrease in Δ7-sterols and increase in Δ5-sterols, 48% of the analysed oils can be declared as adulterated blends of pumpkin seed and sunflower oil. Significant differences in NIR spectroscopy data, in the range of 904–922 nm and 1675–1699 nm, and colourimetric data were found between the control pumpkin seed oil and sunflower oil, but only the NIR method had the potential to detect the authenticity of pumpkin seed oil, which was confirmed by principal component analysis. Orthogonal projection on latent structures (OPLS) discriminant analysis, resulted in working classification models that were able to discriminate pure and adulterated oil. OPLS models based on NIR spectra were also able to successfully predict the content of β-sitosterol and Δ7,22-stigmastadienol in the analysed oils. MDPI 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8954646/ /pubmed/35327258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11060835 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Balbino, Sandra
Vincek, Dragutin
Trtanj, Iva
Egređija, Dunja
Gajdoš-Kljusurić, Jasenka
Kraljić, Klara
Obranović, Marko
Škevin, Dubravka
Assessment of Pumpkin Seed Oil Adulteration Supported by Multivariate Analysis: Comparison of GC-MS, Colourimetry and NIR Spectroscopy Data
title Assessment of Pumpkin Seed Oil Adulteration Supported by Multivariate Analysis: Comparison of GC-MS, Colourimetry and NIR Spectroscopy Data
title_full Assessment of Pumpkin Seed Oil Adulteration Supported by Multivariate Analysis: Comparison of GC-MS, Colourimetry and NIR Spectroscopy Data
title_fullStr Assessment of Pumpkin Seed Oil Adulteration Supported by Multivariate Analysis: Comparison of GC-MS, Colourimetry and NIR Spectroscopy Data
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Pumpkin Seed Oil Adulteration Supported by Multivariate Analysis: Comparison of GC-MS, Colourimetry and NIR Spectroscopy Data
title_short Assessment of Pumpkin Seed Oil Adulteration Supported by Multivariate Analysis: Comparison of GC-MS, Colourimetry and NIR Spectroscopy Data
title_sort assessment of pumpkin seed oil adulteration supported by multivariate analysis: comparison of gc-ms, colourimetry and nir spectroscopy data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35327258
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11060835
work_keys_str_mv AT balbinosandra assessmentofpumpkinseedoiladulterationsupportedbymultivariateanalysiscomparisonofgcmscolourimetryandnirspectroscopydata
AT vincekdragutin assessmentofpumpkinseedoiladulterationsupportedbymultivariateanalysiscomparisonofgcmscolourimetryandnirspectroscopydata
AT trtanjiva assessmentofpumpkinseedoiladulterationsupportedbymultivariateanalysiscomparisonofgcmscolourimetryandnirspectroscopydata
AT egređijadunja assessmentofpumpkinseedoiladulterationsupportedbymultivariateanalysiscomparisonofgcmscolourimetryandnirspectroscopydata
AT gajdoskljusuricjasenka assessmentofpumpkinseedoiladulterationsupportedbymultivariateanalysiscomparisonofgcmscolourimetryandnirspectroscopydata
AT kraljicklara assessmentofpumpkinseedoiladulterationsupportedbymultivariateanalysiscomparisonofgcmscolourimetryandnirspectroscopydata
AT obranovicmarko assessmentofpumpkinseedoiladulterationsupportedbymultivariateanalysiscomparisonofgcmscolourimetryandnirspectroscopydata
AT skevindubravka assessmentofpumpkinseedoiladulterationsupportedbymultivariateanalysiscomparisonofgcmscolourimetryandnirspectroscopydata