Cargando…

Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction—An Overview

The reconstruction of an orbit after complex craniofacial fractures can be extremely demanding. For satisfactory functional and aesthetic results, it is necessary to restore the orbital walls and the craniofacial skeleton using various types of materials. The reconstruction materials can be divided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasile, Victor A., Istrate, Sinziana, Iancu, Raluca C., Piticescu, Roxana M., Cursaru, Laura M., Schmetterer, Leopold, Garhöfer, Gerhard, Cherecheanu, Alina Popa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329635
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062183
_version_ 1784676174129004544
author Vasile, Victor A.
Istrate, Sinziana
Iancu, Raluca C.
Piticescu, Roxana M.
Cursaru, Laura M.
Schmetterer, Leopold
Garhöfer, Gerhard
Cherecheanu, Alina Popa
author_facet Vasile, Victor A.
Istrate, Sinziana
Iancu, Raluca C.
Piticescu, Roxana M.
Cursaru, Laura M.
Schmetterer, Leopold
Garhöfer, Gerhard
Cherecheanu, Alina Popa
author_sort Vasile, Victor A.
collection PubMed
description The reconstruction of an orbit after complex craniofacial fractures can be extremely demanding. For satisfactory functional and aesthetic results, it is necessary to restore the orbital walls and the craniofacial skeleton using various types of materials. The reconstruction materials can be divided into autografts (bone or cartilage tissue) or allografts (metals, ceramics, or plastic materials, and combinations of these materials). Over time, different types of materials have been used, considering characteristics such as their stability, biocompatibility, cost, safety, and intraoperative flexibility. Although the ideal material for orbital reconstruction could not be unanimously identified, much progress has been achieved in recent years. In this article, we summarise the advantages and disadvantages of each category of reconstruction materials. We also provide an update on improvements in material properties through various modern processing techniques. Good results in reconstructive surgery of the orbit require both material and technological innovations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8954765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89547652022-03-26 Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction—An Overview Vasile, Victor A. Istrate, Sinziana Iancu, Raluca C. Piticescu, Roxana M. Cursaru, Laura M. Schmetterer, Leopold Garhöfer, Gerhard Cherecheanu, Alina Popa Materials (Basel) Review The reconstruction of an orbit after complex craniofacial fractures can be extremely demanding. For satisfactory functional and aesthetic results, it is necessary to restore the orbital walls and the craniofacial skeleton using various types of materials. The reconstruction materials can be divided into autografts (bone or cartilage tissue) or allografts (metals, ceramics, or plastic materials, and combinations of these materials). Over time, different types of materials have been used, considering characteristics such as their stability, biocompatibility, cost, safety, and intraoperative flexibility. Although the ideal material for orbital reconstruction could not be unanimously identified, much progress has been achieved in recent years. In this article, we summarise the advantages and disadvantages of each category of reconstruction materials. We also provide an update on improvements in material properties through various modern processing techniques. Good results in reconstructive surgery of the orbit require both material and technological innovations. MDPI 2022-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8954765/ /pubmed/35329635 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062183 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Vasile, Victor A.
Istrate, Sinziana
Iancu, Raluca C.
Piticescu, Roxana M.
Cursaru, Laura M.
Schmetterer, Leopold
Garhöfer, Gerhard
Cherecheanu, Alina Popa
Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction—An Overview
title Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction—An Overview
title_full Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction—An Overview
title_fullStr Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction—An Overview
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction—An Overview
title_short Biocompatible Materials for Orbital Wall Reconstruction—An Overview
title_sort biocompatible materials for orbital wall reconstruction—an overview
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8954765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329635
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15062183
work_keys_str_mv AT vasilevictora biocompatiblematerialsfororbitalwallreconstructionanoverview
AT istratesinziana biocompatiblematerialsfororbitalwallreconstructionanoverview
AT iancuralucac biocompatiblematerialsfororbitalwallreconstructionanoverview
AT piticescuroxanam biocompatiblematerialsfororbitalwallreconstructionanoverview
AT cursarulauram biocompatiblematerialsfororbitalwallreconstructionanoverview
AT schmettererleopold biocompatiblematerialsfororbitalwallreconstructionanoverview
AT garhofergerhard biocompatiblematerialsfororbitalwallreconstructionanoverview
AT cherecheanualinapopa biocompatiblematerialsfororbitalwallreconstructionanoverview