Cargando…

Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal

Breast cancer is the second commonest cancer among female in Nepal. This is our first attempt to audit breast cancer management in our institute and compare with standard quality indicators (QIs) available. METHODS: The retrospective study included 104 female patients with breast cancer who had take...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baral, Shweta, Silwal, Sudhir Raj, Shrestha, Utsav Man, Lamichhane, Deep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35298295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.21.00303
_version_ 1784676250430734336
author Baral, Shweta
Silwal, Sudhir Raj
Shrestha, Utsav Man
Lamichhane, Deep
author_facet Baral, Shweta
Silwal, Sudhir Raj
Shrestha, Utsav Man
Lamichhane, Deep
author_sort Baral, Shweta
collection PubMed
description Breast cancer is the second commonest cancer among female in Nepal. This is our first attempt to audit breast cancer management in our institute and compare with standard quality indicators (QIs) available. METHODS: The retrospective study included 104 female patients with breast cancer who had taken treatment at Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital in 1 year. Participants were selected on the basis of convenience sampling. Of 33 QIs in breast cancer management according to European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists guidelines, 19 QIs were chosen relevant to our setup. These QIs were calculated for all patients and compared with the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists standard target. Frequencies and percentages were calculated and presented in tables. Binomial 95% of the rates for QI adherence were also calculated for each QI. RESULTS: One hundred four patients had a median age of 47.5 years (range 24-70 years). Applicable QIs were in the range of 5-15 with a mean of 9.66 per patient. Of 19 evaluable QIs, very high adherence rates were observed in six QIs, high adherence in three Qis, and low adherences in 10 QIs. High adherence rates were for QI 5 and QI 10a, which were 88.46% and 94.73%, respectively. The low compliance was for QI 1, QI 4a, QI 8, QI 9d, QI 10b, QI 11a, QI 11b, QI 13b, QI 13e, and 14b, which were 53.84%, 78.21%, 0%, 83.16%, 76.92%, 36.0%, 33.33%, 4.76%, 30.55%, and 10.81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There are several QIs that have low levels of adherence in our setting and suggest that there is significant room for improvement. We will be continuing auditing these QIs regularly to improve our quality of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8955076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89550762022-03-28 Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal Baral, Shweta Silwal, Sudhir Raj Shrestha, Utsav Man Lamichhane, Deep JCO Glob Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS Breast cancer is the second commonest cancer among female in Nepal. This is our first attempt to audit breast cancer management in our institute and compare with standard quality indicators (QIs) available. METHODS: The retrospective study included 104 female patients with breast cancer who had taken treatment at Bhaktapur Cancer Hospital in 1 year. Participants were selected on the basis of convenience sampling. Of 33 QIs in breast cancer management according to European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists guidelines, 19 QIs were chosen relevant to our setup. These QIs were calculated for all patients and compared with the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists standard target. Frequencies and percentages were calculated and presented in tables. Binomial 95% of the rates for QI adherence were also calculated for each QI. RESULTS: One hundred four patients had a median age of 47.5 years (range 24-70 years). Applicable QIs were in the range of 5-15 with a mean of 9.66 per patient. Of 19 evaluable QIs, very high adherence rates were observed in six QIs, high adherence in three Qis, and low adherences in 10 QIs. High adherence rates were for QI 5 and QI 10a, which were 88.46% and 94.73%, respectively. The low compliance was for QI 1, QI 4a, QI 8, QI 9d, QI 10b, QI 11a, QI 11b, QI 13b, QI 13e, and 14b, which were 53.84%, 78.21%, 0%, 83.16%, 76.92%, 36.0%, 33.33%, 4.76%, 30.55%, and 10.81%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There are several QIs that have low levels of adherence in our setting and suggest that there is significant room for improvement. We will be continuing auditing these QIs regularly to improve our quality of care. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8955076/ /pubmed/35298295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.21.00303 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Baral, Shweta
Silwal, Sudhir Raj
Shrestha, Utsav Man
Lamichhane, Deep
Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title_full Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title_fullStr Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title_short Evaluation of Quality Indicators of Breast Cancer Management at a Tertiary Cancer Center in Nepal
title_sort evaluation of quality indicators of breast cancer management at a tertiary cancer center in nepal
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35298295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.21.00303
work_keys_str_mv AT baralshweta evaluationofqualityindicatorsofbreastcancermanagementatatertiarycancercenterinnepal
AT silwalsudhirraj evaluationofqualityindicatorsofbreastcancermanagementatatertiarycancercenterinnepal
AT shresthautsavman evaluationofqualityindicatorsofbreastcancermanagementatatertiarycancercenterinnepal
AT lamichhanedeep evaluationofqualityindicatorsofbreastcancermanagementatatertiarycancercenterinnepal