Cargando…

Mapping Bacterial Biofilm on Features of Orthopedic Implants In Vitro

Implant-associated infection is a major complication of orthopedic surgery. One of the most common organisms identified in periprosthetic joint infections is Staphylococcus aureus, a biofilm-forming pathogen. Orthopedic implants are composed of a variety of materials, such as titanium, polyethylene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Kelly, Gupta, Niraj, Gupta, Tripti Thapa, Patel, Khushi, Brooks, Jacob R., Sullivan, Anne, Litsky, Alan S., Stoodley, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35336161
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030586
_version_ 1784676312417304576
author Moore, Kelly
Gupta, Niraj
Gupta, Tripti Thapa
Patel, Khushi
Brooks, Jacob R.
Sullivan, Anne
Litsky, Alan S.
Stoodley, Paul
author_facet Moore, Kelly
Gupta, Niraj
Gupta, Tripti Thapa
Patel, Khushi
Brooks, Jacob R.
Sullivan, Anne
Litsky, Alan S.
Stoodley, Paul
author_sort Moore, Kelly
collection PubMed
description Implant-associated infection is a major complication of orthopedic surgery. One of the most common organisms identified in periprosthetic joint infections is Staphylococcus aureus, a biofilm-forming pathogen. Orthopedic implants are composed of a variety of materials, such as titanium, polyethylene and stainless steel, which are at risk for colonization by bacterial biofilms. Little is known about how larger surface features of orthopedic hardware (such as ridges, holes, edges, etc.) influence biofilm formation and attachment. To study how biofilms might form on actual components, we submerged multiple orthopedic implants of various shapes, sizes, roughness and material type in brain heart infusion broth inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus SAP231, a bioluminescent USA300 strain. Implants were incubated for 72 h with daily media exchanges. After incubation, implants were imaged using an in vitro imaging system (IVIS) and the metabolic signal produced by biofilms was quantified by image analysis. Scanning electron microscopy was then used to image different areas of the implants to complement the IVIS imaging. Rough surfaces had the greatest luminescence compared to edges or smooth surfaces on a single implant and across all implants when the images were merged. The luminescence of edges was also significantly greater than smooth surfaces. These data suggest implant roughness, as well as large-scale surface features, may be at greater risk of biofilm colonization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8955338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89553382022-03-26 Mapping Bacterial Biofilm on Features of Orthopedic Implants In Vitro Moore, Kelly Gupta, Niraj Gupta, Tripti Thapa Patel, Khushi Brooks, Jacob R. Sullivan, Anne Litsky, Alan S. Stoodley, Paul Microorganisms Communication Implant-associated infection is a major complication of orthopedic surgery. One of the most common organisms identified in periprosthetic joint infections is Staphylococcus aureus, a biofilm-forming pathogen. Orthopedic implants are composed of a variety of materials, such as titanium, polyethylene and stainless steel, which are at risk for colonization by bacterial biofilms. Little is known about how larger surface features of orthopedic hardware (such as ridges, holes, edges, etc.) influence biofilm formation and attachment. To study how biofilms might form on actual components, we submerged multiple orthopedic implants of various shapes, sizes, roughness and material type in brain heart infusion broth inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus SAP231, a bioluminescent USA300 strain. Implants were incubated for 72 h with daily media exchanges. After incubation, implants were imaged using an in vitro imaging system (IVIS) and the metabolic signal produced by biofilms was quantified by image analysis. Scanning electron microscopy was then used to image different areas of the implants to complement the IVIS imaging. Rough surfaces had the greatest luminescence compared to edges or smooth surfaces on a single implant and across all implants when the images were merged. The luminescence of edges was also significantly greater than smooth surfaces. These data suggest implant roughness, as well as large-scale surface features, may be at greater risk of biofilm colonization. MDPI 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8955338/ /pubmed/35336161 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030586 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Moore, Kelly
Gupta, Niraj
Gupta, Tripti Thapa
Patel, Khushi
Brooks, Jacob R.
Sullivan, Anne
Litsky, Alan S.
Stoodley, Paul
Mapping Bacterial Biofilm on Features of Orthopedic Implants In Vitro
title Mapping Bacterial Biofilm on Features of Orthopedic Implants In Vitro
title_full Mapping Bacterial Biofilm on Features of Orthopedic Implants In Vitro
title_fullStr Mapping Bacterial Biofilm on Features of Orthopedic Implants In Vitro
title_full_unstemmed Mapping Bacterial Biofilm on Features of Orthopedic Implants In Vitro
title_short Mapping Bacterial Biofilm on Features of Orthopedic Implants In Vitro
title_sort mapping bacterial biofilm on features of orthopedic implants in vitro
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35336161
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030586
work_keys_str_mv AT moorekelly mappingbacterialbiofilmonfeaturesoforthopedicimplantsinvitro
AT guptaniraj mappingbacterialbiofilmonfeaturesoforthopedicimplantsinvitro
AT guptatriptithapa mappingbacterialbiofilmonfeaturesoforthopedicimplantsinvitro
AT patelkhushi mappingbacterialbiofilmonfeaturesoforthopedicimplantsinvitro
AT brooksjacobr mappingbacterialbiofilmonfeaturesoforthopedicimplantsinvitro
AT sullivananne mappingbacterialbiofilmonfeaturesoforthopedicimplantsinvitro
AT litskyalans mappingbacterialbiofilmonfeaturesoforthopedicimplantsinvitro
AT stoodleypaul mappingbacterialbiofilmonfeaturesoforthopedicimplantsinvitro