Cargando…
Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm
Introduction: Diagnosis of lung nodules is still under investigation. We use computed tomography scans and positron emission tomography in order to identify their origin. Patients and Methods: In our retrospective study, we included 248 patients with a single lung nodule or multiple lung nodules of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063569 |
_version_ | 1784676335894921216 |
---|---|
author | Zarogoulidis, Paul Kosmidis, Christoforos S. Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang Matthaios, Dimitrios Sapalidis, Konstantinos Petridis, Dimitrios Perdikouri, Eleni-Isidora Courcoutsakis, Nikos Hatzibougias, Dimitris Arnaoutoglou, Christos Freitag, Lutz Ioannidis, Aristeidis Huang, Haidong Tolis, Christos Bai, Chong Turner, J. Francis |
author_facet | Zarogoulidis, Paul Kosmidis, Christoforos S. Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang Matthaios, Dimitrios Sapalidis, Konstantinos Petridis, Dimitrios Perdikouri, Eleni-Isidora Courcoutsakis, Nikos Hatzibougias, Dimitris Arnaoutoglou, Christos Freitag, Lutz Ioannidis, Aristeidis Huang, Haidong Tolis, Christos Bai, Chong Turner, J. Francis |
author_sort | Zarogoulidis, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Diagnosis of lung nodules is still under investigation. We use computed tomography scans and positron emission tomography in order to identify their origin. Patients and Methods: In our retrospective study, we included 248 patients with a single lung nodule or multiple lung nodules of size ≥1 cm. We used a radial-endobronchial ultrasound and a C-Arm. We used a 1.1 mm cryoprobe versus a 22G needle vs. forceps/brush. We compared the sample size of each biopsy method with the number of cell-block slices. Results: Central lesions indifferent to the method provided the same mean number of cell-block slices (0.04933–0.02410). Cryobiopsies provide less sample size for peripheral lesions due to the higher incidence of pneumothorax (0.04700–0.02296). Conclusion: The larger the lesion ≥2 cm, and central, more cell-blocks are produced indifferent to the biopsy method (0.13386–0.02939). The time of the procedure was observed to be less when the C-Arm was used as an additional navigation tool (0.14854–0.00089). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8955438 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89554382022-03-26 Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm Zarogoulidis, Paul Kosmidis, Christoforos S. Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang Matthaios, Dimitrios Sapalidis, Konstantinos Petridis, Dimitrios Perdikouri, Eleni-Isidora Courcoutsakis, Nikos Hatzibougias, Dimitris Arnaoutoglou, Christos Freitag, Lutz Ioannidis, Aristeidis Huang, Haidong Tolis, Christos Bai, Chong Turner, J. Francis Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Introduction: Diagnosis of lung nodules is still under investigation. We use computed tomography scans and positron emission tomography in order to identify their origin. Patients and Methods: In our retrospective study, we included 248 patients with a single lung nodule or multiple lung nodules of size ≥1 cm. We used a radial-endobronchial ultrasound and a C-Arm. We used a 1.1 mm cryoprobe versus a 22G needle vs. forceps/brush. We compared the sample size of each biopsy method with the number of cell-block slices. Results: Central lesions indifferent to the method provided the same mean number of cell-block slices (0.04933–0.02410). Cryobiopsies provide less sample size for peripheral lesions due to the higher incidence of pneumothorax (0.04700–0.02296). Conclusion: The larger the lesion ≥2 cm, and central, more cell-blocks are produced indifferent to the biopsy method (0.13386–0.02939). The time of the procedure was observed to be less when the C-Arm was used as an additional navigation tool (0.14854–0.00089). MDPI 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8955438/ /pubmed/35329255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063569 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zarogoulidis, Paul Kosmidis, Christoforos S. Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang Matthaios, Dimitrios Sapalidis, Konstantinos Petridis, Dimitrios Perdikouri, Eleni-Isidora Courcoutsakis, Nikos Hatzibougias, Dimitris Arnaoutoglou, Christos Freitag, Lutz Ioannidis, Aristeidis Huang, Haidong Tolis, Christos Bai, Chong Turner, J. Francis Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm |
title | Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm |
title_full | Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm |
title_fullStr | Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm |
title_full_unstemmed | Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm |
title_short | Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm |
title_sort | radial-ebus: cryobiopsy versus conventional biopsy: time-sample and c-arm |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955438/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063569 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zarogoulidispaul radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT kosmidischristofoross radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT hohenforstschmidtwolfgang radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT matthaiosdimitrios radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT sapalidiskonstantinos radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT petridisdimitrios radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT perdikourieleniisidora radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT courcoutsakisnikos radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT hatzibougiasdimitris radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT arnaoutoglouchristos radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT freitaglutz radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT ioannidisaristeidis radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT huanghaidong radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT tolischristos radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT baichong radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm AT turnerjfrancis radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm |