Cargando…

Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm

Introduction: Diagnosis of lung nodules is still under investigation. We use computed tomography scans and positron emission tomography in order to identify their origin. Patients and Methods: In our retrospective study, we included 248 patients with a single lung nodule or multiple lung nodules of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zarogoulidis, Paul, Kosmidis, Christoforos S., Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang, Matthaios, Dimitrios, Sapalidis, Konstantinos, Petridis, Dimitrios, Perdikouri, Eleni-Isidora, Courcoutsakis, Nikos, Hatzibougias, Dimitris, Arnaoutoglou, Christos, Freitag, Lutz, Ioannidis, Aristeidis, Huang, Haidong, Tolis, Christos, Bai, Chong, Turner, J. Francis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063569
_version_ 1784676335894921216
author Zarogoulidis, Paul
Kosmidis, Christoforos S.
Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang
Matthaios, Dimitrios
Sapalidis, Konstantinos
Petridis, Dimitrios
Perdikouri, Eleni-Isidora
Courcoutsakis, Nikos
Hatzibougias, Dimitris
Arnaoutoglou, Christos
Freitag, Lutz
Ioannidis, Aristeidis
Huang, Haidong
Tolis, Christos
Bai, Chong
Turner, J. Francis
author_facet Zarogoulidis, Paul
Kosmidis, Christoforos S.
Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang
Matthaios, Dimitrios
Sapalidis, Konstantinos
Petridis, Dimitrios
Perdikouri, Eleni-Isidora
Courcoutsakis, Nikos
Hatzibougias, Dimitris
Arnaoutoglou, Christos
Freitag, Lutz
Ioannidis, Aristeidis
Huang, Haidong
Tolis, Christos
Bai, Chong
Turner, J. Francis
author_sort Zarogoulidis, Paul
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Diagnosis of lung nodules is still under investigation. We use computed tomography scans and positron emission tomography in order to identify their origin. Patients and Methods: In our retrospective study, we included 248 patients with a single lung nodule or multiple lung nodules of size ≥1 cm. We used a radial-endobronchial ultrasound and a C-Arm. We used a 1.1 mm cryoprobe versus a 22G needle vs. forceps/brush. We compared the sample size of each biopsy method with the number of cell-block slices. Results: Central lesions indifferent to the method provided the same mean number of cell-block slices (0.04933–0.02410). Cryobiopsies provide less sample size for peripheral lesions due to the higher incidence of pneumothorax (0.04700–0.02296). Conclusion: The larger the lesion ≥2 cm, and central, more cell-blocks are produced indifferent to the biopsy method (0.13386–0.02939). The time of the procedure was observed to be less when the C-Arm was used as an additional navigation tool (0.14854–0.00089).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8955438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89554382022-03-26 Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm Zarogoulidis, Paul Kosmidis, Christoforos S. Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang Matthaios, Dimitrios Sapalidis, Konstantinos Petridis, Dimitrios Perdikouri, Eleni-Isidora Courcoutsakis, Nikos Hatzibougias, Dimitris Arnaoutoglou, Christos Freitag, Lutz Ioannidis, Aristeidis Huang, Haidong Tolis, Christos Bai, Chong Turner, J. Francis Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Introduction: Diagnosis of lung nodules is still under investigation. We use computed tomography scans and positron emission tomography in order to identify their origin. Patients and Methods: In our retrospective study, we included 248 patients with a single lung nodule or multiple lung nodules of size ≥1 cm. We used a radial-endobronchial ultrasound and a C-Arm. We used a 1.1 mm cryoprobe versus a 22G needle vs. forceps/brush. We compared the sample size of each biopsy method with the number of cell-block slices. Results: Central lesions indifferent to the method provided the same mean number of cell-block slices (0.04933–0.02410). Cryobiopsies provide less sample size for peripheral lesions due to the higher incidence of pneumothorax (0.04700–0.02296). Conclusion: The larger the lesion ≥2 cm, and central, more cell-blocks are produced indifferent to the biopsy method (0.13386–0.02939). The time of the procedure was observed to be less when the C-Arm was used as an additional navigation tool (0.14854–0.00089). MDPI 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8955438/ /pubmed/35329255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063569 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zarogoulidis, Paul
Kosmidis, Christoforos S.
Hohenforst-Schmidt, Wolfgang
Matthaios, Dimitrios
Sapalidis, Konstantinos
Petridis, Dimitrios
Perdikouri, Eleni-Isidora
Courcoutsakis, Nikos
Hatzibougias, Dimitris
Arnaoutoglou, Christos
Freitag, Lutz
Ioannidis, Aristeidis
Huang, Haidong
Tolis, Christos
Bai, Chong
Turner, J. Francis
Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm
title Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm
title_full Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm
title_fullStr Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm
title_full_unstemmed Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm
title_short Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm
title_sort radial-ebus: cryobiopsy versus conventional biopsy: time-sample and c-arm
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063569
work_keys_str_mv AT zarogoulidispaul radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT kosmidischristofoross radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT hohenforstschmidtwolfgang radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT matthaiosdimitrios radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT sapalidiskonstantinos radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT petridisdimitrios radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT perdikourieleniisidora radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT courcoutsakisnikos radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT hatzibougiasdimitris radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT arnaoutoglouchristos radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT freitaglutz radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT ioannidisaristeidis radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT huanghaidong radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT tolischristos radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT baichong radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm
AT turnerjfrancis radialebuscryobiopsyversusconventionalbiopsytimesampleandcarm