Cargando…

Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia

Intracortical microelectrode arrays are used for recording neural signals at single-unit resolution and are promising tools for studying brain function and developing neuroprosthetics. Research is being done to increase the chronic performance and reliability of these probes, which tend to decrease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sturgill, Brandon, Radhakrishna, Rahul, Thai, Teresa Thuc Doan, Patnaik, Sourav S., Capadona, Jeffrey R., Pancrazio, Joseph J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35334770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13030480
_version_ 1784676430088503296
author Sturgill, Brandon
Radhakrishna, Rahul
Thai, Teresa Thuc Doan
Patnaik, Sourav S.
Capadona, Jeffrey R.
Pancrazio, Joseph J.
author_facet Sturgill, Brandon
Radhakrishna, Rahul
Thai, Teresa Thuc Doan
Patnaik, Sourav S.
Capadona, Jeffrey R.
Pancrazio, Joseph J.
author_sort Sturgill, Brandon
collection PubMed
description Intracortical microelectrode arrays are used for recording neural signals at single-unit resolution and are promising tools for studying brain function and developing neuroprosthetics. Research is being done to increase the chronic performance and reliability of these probes, which tend to decrease or fail within several months of implantation. Although recording paradigms vary, studies focused on assessing the reliability and performance of these devices often perform recordings under anesthesia. However, anesthetics—such as isoflurane—are known to alter neural activity and electrophysiologic function. Therefore, we compared the neural recording performance under anesthesia (2% isoflurane) followed by awake conditions for probes implanted in the motor cortex of both male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. While the single-unit spike rate was significantly higher by almost 600% under awake compared to anesthetized conditions, we found no difference in the active electrode yield between the two conditions two weeks after surgery. Additionally, the signal-to-noise ratio was greater under anesthesia due to the noise levels being nearly 50% greater in awake recordings, even though there was a 14% increase in the peak-to-peak voltage of distinguished single units when awake. We observe that these findings are similar for chronic time points as well. Our observations indicate that either anesthetized or awake recordings are acceptable for studies assessing the chronic reliability and performance of intracortical microelectrode arrays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8955818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89558182022-03-26 Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia Sturgill, Brandon Radhakrishna, Rahul Thai, Teresa Thuc Doan Patnaik, Sourav S. Capadona, Jeffrey R. Pancrazio, Joseph J. Micromachines (Basel) Communication Intracortical microelectrode arrays are used for recording neural signals at single-unit resolution and are promising tools for studying brain function and developing neuroprosthetics. Research is being done to increase the chronic performance and reliability of these probes, which tend to decrease or fail within several months of implantation. Although recording paradigms vary, studies focused on assessing the reliability and performance of these devices often perform recordings under anesthesia. However, anesthetics—such as isoflurane—are known to alter neural activity and electrophysiologic function. Therefore, we compared the neural recording performance under anesthesia (2% isoflurane) followed by awake conditions for probes implanted in the motor cortex of both male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. While the single-unit spike rate was significantly higher by almost 600% under awake compared to anesthetized conditions, we found no difference in the active electrode yield between the two conditions two weeks after surgery. Additionally, the signal-to-noise ratio was greater under anesthesia due to the noise levels being nearly 50% greater in awake recordings, even though there was a 14% increase in the peak-to-peak voltage of distinguished single units when awake. We observe that these findings are similar for chronic time points as well. Our observations indicate that either anesthetized or awake recordings are acceptable for studies assessing the chronic reliability and performance of intracortical microelectrode arrays. MDPI 2022-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8955818/ /pubmed/35334770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13030480 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Sturgill, Brandon
Radhakrishna, Rahul
Thai, Teresa Thuc Doan
Patnaik, Sourav S.
Capadona, Jeffrey R.
Pancrazio, Joseph J.
Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia
title Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia
title_full Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia
title_fullStr Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia
title_short Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia
title_sort characterization of active electrode yield for intracortical arrays: awake versus anesthesia
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35334770
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13030480
work_keys_str_mv AT sturgillbrandon characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia
AT radhakrishnarahul characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia
AT thaiteresathucdoan characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia
AT patnaiksouravs characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia
AT capadonajeffreyr characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia
AT pancraziojosephj characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia