Cargando…
Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia
Intracortical microelectrode arrays are used for recording neural signals at single-unit resolution and are promising tools for studying brain function and developing neuroprosthetics. Research is being done to increase the chronic performance and reliability of these probes, which tend to decrease...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35334770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13030480 |
_version_ | 1784676430088503296 |
---|---|
author | Sturgill, Brandon Radhakrishna, Rahul Thai, Teresa Thuc Doan Patnaik, Sourav S. Capadona, Jeffrey R. Pancrazio, Joseph J. |
author_facet | Sturgill, Brandon Radhakrishna, Rahul Thai, Teresa Thuc Doan Patnaik, Sourav S. Capadona, Jeffrey R. Pancrazio, Joseph J. |
author_sort | Sturgill, Brandon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intracortical microelectrode arrays are used for recording neural signals at single-unit resolution and are promising tools for studying brain function and developing neuroprosthetics. Research is being done to increase the chronic performance and reliability of these probes, which tend to decrease or fail within several months of implantation. Although recording paradigms vary, studies focused on assessing the reliability and performance of these devices often perform recordings under anesthesia. However, anesthetics—such as isoflurane—are known to alter neural activity and electrophysiologic function. Therefore, we compared the neural recording performance under anesthesia (2% isoflurane) followed by awake conditions for probes implanted in the motor cortex of both male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. While the single-unit spike rate was significantly higher by almost 600% under awake compared to anesthetized conditions, we found no difference in the active electrode yield between the two conditions two weeks after surgery. Additionally, the signal-to-noise ratio was greater under anesthesia due to the noise levels being nearly 50% greater in awake recordings, even though there was a 14% increase in the peak-to-peak voltage of distinguished single units when awake. We observe that these findings are similar for chronic time points as well. Our observations indicate that either anesthetized or awake recordings are acceptable for studies assessing the chronic reliability and performance of intracortical microelectrode arrays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8955818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89558182022-03-26 Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia Sturgill, Brandon Radhakrishna, Rahul Thai, Teresa Thuc Doan Patnaik, Sourav S. Capadona, Jeffrey R. Pancrazio, Joseph J. Micromachines (Basel) Communication Intracortical microelectrode arrays are used for recording neural signals at single-unit resolution and are promising tools for studying brain function and developing neuroprosthetics. Research is being done to increase the chronic performance and reliability of these probes, which tend to decrease or fail within several months of implantation. Although recording paradigms vary, studies focused on assessing the reliability and performance of these devices often perform recordings under anesthesia. However, anesthetics—such as isoflurane—are known to alter neural activity and electrophysiologic function. Therefore, we compared the neural recording performance under anesthesia (2% isoflurane) followed by awake conditions for probes implanted in the motor cortex of both male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. While the single-unit spike rate was significantly higher by almost 600% under awake compared to anesthetized conditions, we found no difference in the active electrode yield between the two conditions two weeks after surgery. Additionally, the signal-to-noise ratio was greater under anesthesia due to the noise levels being nearly 50% greater in awake recordings, even though there was a 14% increase in the peak-to-peak voltage of distinguished single units when awake. We observe that these findings are similar for chronic time points as well. Our observations indicate that either anesthetized or awake recordings are acceptable for studies assessing the chronic reliability and performance of intracortical microelectrode arrays. MDPI 2022-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8955818/ /pubmed/35334770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13030480 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Sturgill, Brandon Radhakrishna, Rahul Thai, Teresa Thuc Doan Patnaik, Sourav S. Capadona, Jeffrey R. Pancrazio, Joseph J. Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia |
title | Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia |
title_full | Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia |
title_fullStr | Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia |
title_short | Characterization of Active Electrode Yield for Intracortical Arrays: Awake versus Anesthesia |
title_sort | characterization of active electrode yield for intracortical arrays: awake versus anesthesia |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35334770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi13030480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sturgillbrandon characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia AT radhakrishnarahul characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia AT thaiteresathucdoan characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia AT patnaiksouravs characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia AT capadonajeffreyr characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia AT pancraziojosephj characterizationofactiveelectrodeyieldforintracorticalarraysawakeversusanesthesia |