Cargando…

Risk Exposure to Legionella pneumophila during Showering: The Difference between a Classical and a Water Saving Shower System

The increase in legionellosis incidence in the general population in recent years calls for a better characterization of the sources of infection, such as showering. Water-efficient shower systems that use water-atomizing technology have been shown to emit slightly more inhalable particles in the ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niculita-Hirzel, Hélène, Vanhove, Audrey S., Leclerc, Lara, Girardot, Françoise, Pourchez, Jérémie, Allegra, Séverine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328980
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063285
_version_ 1784676434493571072
author Niculita-Hirzel, Hélène
Vanhove, Audrey S.
Leclerc, Lara
Girardot, Françoise
Pourchez, Jérémie
Allegra, Séverine
author_facet Niculita-Hirzel, Hélène
Vanhove, Audrey S.
Leclerc, Lara
Girardot, Françoise
Pourchez, Jérémie
Allegra, Séverine
author_sort Niculita-Hirzel, Hélène
collection PubMed
description The increase in legionellosis incidence in the general population in recent years calls for a better characterization of the sources of infection, such as showering. Water-efficient shower systems that use water-atomizing technology have been shown to emit slightly more inhalable particles in the range of bacterial sizes than the traditional systems; however, the actual rate of bacterial emission remains poorly documented. The aim of this study was to assess the aerosolisation rate of the opportunistic water pathogen Legionella pneumophila during showering with one shower system representative of each technology. To achieve this objective, we performed controlled experiments inside a glove box and determined the emitted dose and viability of airborne Legionella. The bioaerosols were sampled with a Coriolis(®) Delta air sampler and the total number of viable (cultivable and noncultivable) Legionella was determined by flow cytometry and culture. We found that the rate of viable and cultivable Legionella aerosolized from the water jet was similar between the two showerheads: the viable fraction represents 0.02% of the overall bacteria present in water, while the cultivable fraction corresponds to only 0.0005%. The two showerhead models emitted a similar ratio of airborne Legionella viable and cultivable per volume of water used. Therefore, the risk of exposure to Legionella is not expected to increase significantly with the new generation of water-efficient showerheads.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8955837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89558372022-03-26 Risk Exposure to Legionella pneumophila during Showering: The Difference between a Classical and a Water Saving Shower System Niculita-Hirzel, Hélène Vanhove, Audrey S. Leclerc, Lara Girardot, Françoise Pourchez, Jérémie Allegra, Séverine Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The increase in legionellosis incidence in the general population in recent years calls for a better characterization of the sources of infection, such as showering. Water-efficient shower systems that use water-atomizing technology have been shown to emit slightly more inhalable particles in the range of bacterial sizes than the traditional systems; however, the actual rate of bacterial emission remains poorly documented. The aim of this study was to assess the aerosolisation rate of the opportunistic water pathogen Legionella pneumophila during showering with one shower system representative of each technology. To achieve this objective, we performed controlled experiments inside a glove box and determined the emitted dose and viability of airborne Legionella. The bioaerosols were sampled with a Coriolis(®) Delta air sampler and the total number of viable (cultivable and noncultivable) Legionella was determined by flow cytometry and culture. We found that the rate of viable and cultivable Legionella aerosolized from the water jet was similar between the two showerheads: the viable fraction represents 0.02% of the overall bacteria present in water, while the cultivable fraction corresponds to only 0.0005%. The two showerhead models emitted a similar ratio of airborne Legionella viable and cultivable per volume of water used. Therefore, the risk of exposure to Legionella is not expected to increase significantly with the new generation of water-efficient showerheads. MDPI 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8955837/ /pubmed/35328980 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063285 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Niculita-Hirzel, Hélène
Vanhove, Audrey S.
Leclerc, Lara
Girardot, Françoise
Pourchez, Jérémie
Allegra, Séverine
Risk Exposure to Legionella pneumophila during Showering: The Difference between a Classical and a Water Saving Shower System
title Risk Exposure to Legionella pneumophila during Showering: The Difference between a Classical and a Water Saving Shower System
title_full Risk Exposure to Legionella pneumophila during Showering: The Difference between a Classical and a Water Saving Shower System
title_fullStr Risk Exposure to Legionella pneumophila during Showering: The Difference between a Classical and a Water Saving Shower System
title_full_unstemmed Risk Exposure to Legionella pneumophila during Showering: The Difference between a Classical and a Water Saving Shower System
title_short Risk Exposure to Legionella pneumophila during Showering: The Difference between a Classical and a Water Saving Shower System
title_sort risk exposure to legionella pneumophila during showering: the difference between a classical and a water saving shower system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35328980
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063285
work_keys_str_mv AT niculitahirzelhelene riskexposuretolegionellapneumophiladuringshoweringthedifferencebetweenaclassicalandawatersavingshowersystem
AT vanhoveaudreys riskexposuretolegionellapneumophiladuringshoweringthedifferencebetweenaclassicalandawatersavingshowersystem
AT leclerclara riskexposuretolegionellapneumophiladuringshoweringthedifferencebetweenaclassicalandawatersavingshowersystem
AT girardotfrancoise riskexposuretolegionellapneumophiladuringshoweringthedifferencebetweenaclassicalandawatersavingshowersystem
AT pourchezjeremie riskexposuretolegionellapneumophiladuringshoweringthedifferencebetweenaclassicalandawatersavingshowersystem
AT allegraseverine riskexposuretolegionellapneumophiladuringshoweringthedifferencebetweenaclassicalandawatersavingshowersystem