Cargando…

Does Valved Holding Chamber Improve Aerosol Lung Deposition with a Jet Nebulizer? A Randomized Crossover Study

Using valved holding chambers (VHC) during aerosol therapy has been reported to improve the inhaled dose with various aerosol devices, including vibrating mesh nebulizers. The aim of this study was to quantify the pulmonary deposition of a jet nebulizer (JN) with and without a VHC, and a mesh nebuli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alcoforado, Luciana, Paiva, Dulciane Nunes, Ari, Arzu, Barcelar, Jacqueline de Melo, Brandão, Simone Cristina Soares, Fink, James B., Dornelas de Andrade, Armele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8956008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35335942
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030566
_version_ 1784676475169931264
author Alcoforado, Luciana
Paiva, Dulciane Nunes
Ari, Arzu
Barcelar, Jacqueline de Melo
Brandão, Simone Cristina Soares
Fink, James B.
Dornelas de Andrade, Armele
author_facet Alcoforado, Luciana
Paiva, Dulciane Nunes
Ari, Arzu
Barcelar, Jacqueline de Melo
Brandão, Simone Cristina Soares
Fink, James B.
Dornelas de Andrade, Armele
author_sort Alcoforado, Luciana
collection PubMed
description Using valved holding chambers (VHC) during aerosol therapy has been reported to improve the inhaled dose with various aerosol devices, including vibrating mesh nebulizers. The aim of this study was to quantify the pulmonary deposition of a jet nebulizer (JN) with and without a VHC, and a mesh nebulizer (MN) with a VHC in a randomized cross-over trial with seven healthy consenting adults. Our hypothesis was that the use of a VHC would improve deposition with the JN. Diethylnitriaminopentacetic acid with technetium (DTPA-Tc99m), with the activity of 1 mC with 0.9% saline solution was nebulized. The radiolabeled aerosol was detected by 2D planar scintigraphy after administration. The pulmonary deposition was greater with a JN with a VHC (4.5%) than a JN alone (3.2%; p = 0.005. However, an MN with a VHC (30.0%) was six-fold greater than a JN or JN with a VHC (p < 0.001). The extrapulmonary deposition was higher in the JN group without a VHC than in the other two modalities (p < 0.001). Deposition in the device was greater with a JN + VHC than an MN+/VHC (p < 0.001). Lower residual drug at the end of the dose was detected with an MN than either JN configuration. The exhaled dose was greater with a JN alone than either an MN or JN with VHC (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the addition of the VHC did not substantially improve the efficiency of aerosol lung deposition over a JN alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8956008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89560082022-03-26 Does Valved Holding Chamber Improve Aerosol Lung Deposition with a Jet Nebulizer? A Randomized Crossover Study Alcoforado, Luciana Paiva, Dulciane Nunes Ari, Arzu Barcelar, Jacqueline de Melo Brandão, Simone Cristina Soares Fink, James B. Dornelas de Andrade, Armele Pharmaceutics Article Using valved holding chambers (VHC) during aerosol therapy has been reported to improve the inhaled dose with various aerosol devices, including vibrating mesh nebulizers. The aim of this study was to quantify the pulmonary deposition of a jet nebulizer (JN) with and without a VHC, and a mesh nebulizer (MN) with a VHC in a randomized cross-over trial with seven healthy consenting adults. Our hypothesis was that the use of a VHC would improve deposition with the JN. Diethylnitriaminopentacetic acid with technetium (DTPA-Tc99m), with the activity of 1 mC with 0.9% saline solution was nebulized. The radiolabeled aerosol was detected by 2D planar scintigraphy after administration. The pulmonary deposition was greater with a JN with a VHC (4.5%) than a JN alone (3.2%; p = 0.005. However, an MN with a VHC (30.0%) was six-fold greater than a JN or JN with a VHC (p < 0.001). The extrapulmonary deposition was higher in the JN group without a VHC than in the other two modalities (p < 0.001). Deposition in the device was greater with a JN + VHC than an MN+/VHC (p < 0.001). Lower residual drug at the end of the dose was detected with an MN than either JN configuration. The exhaled dose was greater with a JN alone than either an MN or JN with VHC (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the addition of the VHC did not substantially improve the efficiency of aerosol lung deposition over a JN alone. MDPI 2022-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8956008/ /pubmed/35335942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030566 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alcoforado, Luciana
Paiva, Dulciane Nunes
Ari, Arzu
Barcelar, Jacqueline de Melo
Brandão, Simone Cristina Soares
Fink, James B.
Dornelas de Andrade, Armele
Does Valved Holding Chamber Improve Aerosol Lung Deposition with a Jet Nebulizer? A Randomized Crossover Study
title Does Valved Holding Chamber Improve Aerosol Lung Deposition with a Jet Nebulizer? A Randomized Crossover Study
title_full Does Valved Holding Chamber Improve Aerosol Lung Deposition with a Jet Nebulizer? A Randomized Crossover Study
title_fullStr Does Valved Holding Chamber Improve Aerosol Lung Deposition with a Jet Nebulizer? A Randomized Crossover Study
title_full_unstemmed Does Valved Holding Chamber Improve Aerosol Lung Deposition with a Jet Nebulizer? A Randomized Crossover Study
title_short Does Valved Holding Chamber Improve Aerosol Lung Deposition with a Jet Nebulizer? A Randomized Crossover Study
title_sort does valved holding chamber improve aerosol lung deposition with a jet nebulizer? a randomized crossover study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8956008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35335942
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14030566
work_keys_str_mv AT alcoforadoluciana doesvalvedholdingchamberimproveaerosollungdepositionwithajetnebulizerarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT paivadulcianenunes doesvalvedholdingchamberimproveaerosollungdepositionwithajetnebulizerarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT ariarzu doesvalvedholdingchamberimproveaerosollungdepositionwithajetnebulizerarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT barcelarjacquelinedemelo doesvalvedholdingchamberimproveaerosollungdepositionwithajetnebulizerarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT brandaosimonecristinasoares doesvalvedholdingchamberimproveaerosollungdepositionwithajetnebulizerarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT finkjamesb doesvalvedholdingchamberimproveaerosollungdepositionwithajetnebulizerarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT dornelasdeandradearmele doesvalvedholdingchamberimproveaerosollungdepositionwithajetnebulizerarandomizedcrossoverstudy