Cargando…
Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers
PURPOSE: The authors developed and validated an algorithm using health administrative data to identify patients who are attached or uncertainly attached to a primary care provider (PCP) using patient responses to a survey conducted in Ontario, Canada. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors conduct...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Emerald Publishing Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8956282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34304401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-05-2020-0171 |
_version_ | 1784676531566542848 |
---|---|
author | Jaakkimainen, Liisa Bayoumi, Imaan Glazier, Richard H. Premji, Kamila Kiran, Tara Khan, Shahriar Frymire, Eliot Green, Michael E. |
author_facet | Jaakkimainen, Liisa Bayoumi, Imaan Glazier, Richard H. Premji, Kamila Kiran, Tara Khan, Shahriar Frymire, Eliot Green, Michael E. |
author_sort | Jaakkimainen, Liisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The authors developed and validated an algorithm using health administrative data to identify patients who are attached or uncertainly attached to a primary care provider (PCP) using patient responses to a survey conducted in Ontario, Canada. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors conducted a validation study using as a reference standard respondents to a community-based survey who indicated they did or did not have a PCP. The authors developed and tested health administrative algorithms against this reference standard. The authors calculated the sensitivity, specificity positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) on the final patient attachment algorithm. The authors then applied the attachment algorithm to the 2017 Ontario population. FINDINGS: The patient attachment algorithm had an excellent sensitivity (90.5%) and PPV (96.8%), though modest specificity (46.1%) and a low NPV (21.3%). This means that the algorithm assigned survey respondents as being attached to a PCP and when in fact they said they had a PCP, yet a significant proportion of those found to be uncertainly attached had indicated they did have a PCP. In 2017, most people in Ontario, Canada (85.4%) were attached to a PCP but 14.6% were uncertainly attached. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Administrative data for nurse practitioner's encounters and other interprofessional care providers are not currently available. The authors also cannot separately identify primary care visits conducted in walk in clinics using our health administrative data. Finally, the definition of hospital-based healthcare use did not include outpatient specialty care. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Uncertain attachment to a primary health care provider is a recurrent problem that results in inequitable access in health services delivery. Providing annual reports on uncertainly attached patients can help evaluate primary care system changes developed to improve access. This algorithm can be used by health care planners and policy makers to examine the geographic variability and time trends of the uncertainly attached population to inform the development of programs to improve primary care access. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: As primary care is an essential component of a person's medical home, identifying regions or high need populations that have higher levels of uncertainly attached patients will help target programs to support their primary care access and needs. Furthermore, this approach will be useful in future research to determine the health impacts of uncertain attachment to primary care, especially in view of a growing body of the literature highlighting the importance of primary care continuity. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This patient attachment algorithm is the first to use existing health administrative data validated with responses from a patient survey. Using patient surveys alone to assess attachment levels is expensive and time consuming to complete. They can also be subject to poor response rates and recall bias. Utilizing existing health administrative data provides more accurate, timely estimates of patient attachment for everyone in the population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8956282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89562822022-04-11 Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers Jaakkimainen, Liisa Bayoumi, Imaan Glazier, Richard H. Premji, Kamila Kiran, Tara Khan, Shahriar Frymire, Eliot Green, Michael E. J Health Organ Manag Research Paper PURPOSE: The authors developed and validated an algorithm using health administrative data to identify patients who are attached or uncertainly attached to a primary care provider (PCP) using patient responses to a survey conducted in Ontario, Canada. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors conducted a validation study using as a reference standard respondents to a community-based survey who indicated they did or did not have a PCP. The authors developed and tested health administrative algorithms against this reference standard. The authors calculated the sensitivity, specificity positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) on the final patient attachment algorithm. The authors then applied the attachment algorithm to the 2017 Ontario population. FINDINGS: The patient attachment algorithm had an excellent sensitivity (90.5%) and PPV (96.8%), though modest specificity (46.1%) and a low NPV (21.3%). This means that the algorithm assigned survey respondents as being attached to a PCP and when in fact they said they had a PCP, yet a significant proportion of those found to be uncertainly attached had indicated they did have a PCP. In 2017, most people in Ontario, Canada (85.4%) were attached to a PCP but 14.6% were uncertainly attached. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Administrative data for nurse practitioner's encounters and other interprofessional care providers are not currently available. The authors also cannot separately identify primary care visits conducted in walk in clinics using our health administrative data. Finally, the definition of hospital-based healthcare use did not include outpatient specialty care. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Uncertain attachment to a primary health care provider is a recurrent problem that results in inequitable access in health services delivery. Providing annual reports on uncertainly attached patients can help evaluate primary care system changes developed to improve access. This algorithm can be used by health care planners and policy makers to examine the geographic variability and time trends of the uncertainly attached population to inform the development of programs to improve primary care access. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: As primary care is an essential component of a person's medical home, identifying regions or high need populations that have higher levels of uncertainly attached patients will help target programs to support their primary care access and needs. Furthermore, this approach will be useful in future research to determine the health impacts of uncertain attachment to primary care, especially in view of a growing body of the literature highlighting the importance of primary care continuity. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This patient attachment algorithm is the first to use existing health administrative data validated with responses from a patient survey. Using patient surveys alone to assess attachment levels is expensive and time consuming to complete. They can also be subject to poor response rates and recall bias. Utilizing existing health administrative data provides more accurate, timely estimates of patient attachment for everyone in the population. Emerald Publishing Limited 2021-07-26 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8956282/ /pubmed/34304401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-05-2020-0171 Text en © Liisa Jaakkimainen, Imaan Bayoumi, Richard H. Glazier, Kamila Premji, Tara Kiran, Shahriar Khan, Eliot Frymire and Michael E. Green https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Jaakkimainen, Liisa Bayoumi, Imaan Glazier, Richard H. Premji, Kamila Kiran, Tara Khan, Shahriar Frymire, Eliot Green, Michael E. Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers |
title | Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers |
title_full | Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers |
title_short | Development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers |
title_sort | development and validation of an algorithm using health administrative data to define patient attachment to primary care providers |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8956282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34304401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-05-2020-0171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaakkimainenliisa developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmusinghealthadministrativedatatodefinepatientattachmenttoprimarycareproviders AT bayoumiimaan developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmusinghealthadministrativedatatodefinepatientattachmenttoprimarycareproviders AT glazierrichardh developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmusinghealthadministrativedatatodefinepatientattachmenttoprimarycareproviders AT premjikamila developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmusinghealthadministrativedatatodefinepatientattachmenttoprimarycareproviders AT kirantara developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmusinghealthadministrativedatatodefinepatientattachmenttoprimarycareproviders AT khanshahriar developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmusinghealthadministrativedatatodefinepatientattachmenttoprimarycareproviders AT frymireeliot developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmusinghealthadministrativedatatodefinepatientattachmenttoprimarycareproviders AT greenmichaele developmentandvalidationofanalgorithmusinghealthadministrativedatatodefinepatientattachmenttoprimarycareproviders |