Cargando…

Creatinine standardization: a key consideration in evaluating whole blood creatinine monitoring systems for CKD screening

Early detection of CKD using point of care creatinine and eGFR testing improves patient management outcomes. We undertook a field study to evaluate the use of a whole blood creatinine/eGFR device to screen a rural Nicaraguan population to determine the variability between creatinine methods and spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalton, Raymond Neil, Isbell, Timothy Scott, Ferguson, Ryan, Fiore, Louis, Malic, Andrei, DuBois, Jeffrey Anton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8956531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-03942-7
_version_ 1784676586717446144
author Dalton, Raymond Neil
Isbell, Timothy Scott
Ferguson, Ryan
Fiore, Louis
Malic, Andrei
DuBois, Jeffrey Anton
author_facet Dalton, Raymond Neil
Isbell, Timothy Scott
Ferguson, Ryan
Fiore, Louis
Malic, Andrei
DuBois, Jeffrey Anton
author_sort Dalton, Raymond Neil
collection PubMed
description Early detection of CKD using point of care creatinine and eGFR testing improves patient management outcomes. We undertook a field study to evaluate the use of a whole blood creatinine/eGFR device to screen a rural Nicaraguan population to determine the variability between creatinine methods and specimen types. All specimens including capillary and venous dried blood spots (DBS) were tested with an isotope dilution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (ID-LCMS) gold standard method. This is to our knowledge the first time a capillary whole blood (POC) method has been directly compared to the gold standard IDMS method, through the novel approach of using dried blood spots. Capillary and venous whole blood specimens were obtained and tested directly with the BCMS method, and then, DBS samples were prepared. Venous plasma specimens were tested using three laboratory analyzer creatinine methods. DBS were sent to the site performing ID-LCMS. Control samples were also prepared to assess the stability of shipment and storage of DBS. The ID-LCMS method was aligned using primary and secondary standards. Sixty-six (66) patients participated in the study, and the CKD prevalence rate was 7.8%. While all creatinine methods showed a good correlation to ID-LCMS, there was a positive bias (mean absolute bias range: 0.21–0.63 mg/dL). All methods used were 100% sensitive, but specificity varied from 62.7 to 94.9% with PPV ranging from 25 to 62.5%. A correction factor was used to align the values from each method to ID-LCMS which improved the specificity of each method. This study used a unique DBS approach to align capillary whole blood creatinine to ID-LCMS. To ensure reliability of BCMS for identifying screened patients with CKD, it is important to establish IDMS traceability and alignment prior to undertaking CKD studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8956531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89565312022-04-07 Creatinine standardization: a key consideration in evaluating whole blood creatinine monitoring systems for CKD screening Dalton, Raymond Neil Isbell, Timothy Scott Ferguson, Ryan Fiore, Louis Malic, Andrei DuBois, Jeffrey Anton Anal Bioanal Chem Research Paper Early detection of CKD using point of care creatinine and eGFR testing improves patient management outcomes. We undertook a field study to evaluate the use of a whole blood creatinine/eGFR device to screen a rural Nicaraguan population to determine the variability between creatinine methods and specimen types. All specimens including capillary and venous dried blood spots (DBS) were tested with an isotope dilution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (ID-LCMS) gold standard method. This is to our knowledge the first time a capillary whole blood (POC) method has been directly compared to the gold standard IDMS method, through the novel approach of using dried blood spots. Capillary and venous whole blood specimens were obtained and tested directly with the BCMS method, and then, DBS samples were prepared. Venous plasma specimens were tested using three laboratory analyzer creatinine methods. DBS were sent to the site performing ID-LCMS. Control samples were also prepared to assess the stability of shipment and storage of DBS. The ID-LCMS method was aligned using primary and secondary standards. Sixty-six (66) patients participated in the study, and the CKD prevalence rate was 7.8%. While all creatinine methods showed a good correlation to ID-LCMS, there was a positive bias (mean absolute bias range: 0.21–0.63 mg/dL). All methods used were 100% sensitive, but specificity varied from 62.7 to 94.9% with PPV ranging from 25 to 62.5%. A correction factor was used to align the values from each method to ID-LCMS which improved the specificity of each method. This study used a unique DBS approach to align capillary whole blood creatinine to ID-LCMS. To ensure reliability of BCMS for identifying screened patients with CKD, it is important to establish IDMS traceability and alignment prior to undertaking CKD studies. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-03-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8956531/ /pubmed/35260937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-03942-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Paper
Dalton, Raymond Neil
Isbell, Timothy Scott
Ferguson, Ryan
Fiore, Louis
Malic, Andrei
DuBois, Jeffrey Anton
Creatinine standardization: a key consideration in evaluating whole blood creatinine monitoring systems for CKD screening
title Creatinine standardization: a key consideration in evaluating whole blood creatinine monitoring systems for CKD screening
title_full Creatinine standardization: a key consideration in evaluating whole blood creatinine monitoring systems for CKD screening
title_fullStr Creatinine standardization: a key consideration in evaluating whole blood creatinine monitoring systems for CKD screening
title_full_unstemmed Creatinine standardization: a key consideration in evaluating whole blood creatinine monitoring systems for CKD screening
title_short Creatinine standardization: a key consideration in evaluating whole blood creatinine monitoring systems for CKD screening
title_sort creatinine standardization: a key consideration in evaluating whole blood creatinine monitoring systems for ckd screening
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8956531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-03942-7
work_keys_str_mv AT daltonraymondneil creatininestandardizationakeyconsiderationinevaluatingwholebloodcreatininemonitoringsystemsforckdscreening
AT isbelltimothyscott creatininestandardizationakeyconsiderationinevaluatingwholebloodcreatininemonitoringsystemsforckdscreening
AT fergusonryan creatininestandardizationakeyconsiderationinevaluatingwholebloodcreatininemonitoringsystemsforckdscreening
AT fiorelouis creatininestandardizationakeyconsiderationinevaluatingwholebloodcreatininemonitoringsystemsforckdscreening
AT malicandrei creatininestandardizationakeyconsiderationinevaluatingwholebloodcreatininemonitoringsystemsforckdscreening
AT duboisjeffreyanton creatininestandardizationakeyconsiderationinevaluatingwholebloodcreatininemonitoringsystemsforckdscreening