Cargando…

Rural Hospital Administrators’ Beliefs About Safety, Financial Viability, and Community Need for Offering Obstetric Care

IMPORTANCE: Rural obstetric unit closures are associated with adverse maternal and infant health outcomes and are most common among low–birth volume facilities located in remote areas. Declining access to obstetric care is a concern in rural communities in the US. OBJECTIVE: To assess rural hospital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kozhimannil, Katy B., Interrante, Julia D., Admon, Lindsay K., Basile Ibrahim, Bridget L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8956977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0204
_version_ 1784676671885934592
author Kozhimannil, Katy B.
Interrante, Julia D.
Admon, Lindsay K.
Basile Ibrahim, Bridget L.
author_facet Kozhimannil, Katy B.
Interrante, Julia D.
Admon, Lindsay K.
Basile Ibrahim, Bridget L.
author_sort Kozhimannil, Katy B.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Rural obstetric unit closures are associated with adverse maternal and infant health outcomes and are most common among low–birth volume facilities located in remote areas. Declining access to obstetric care is a concern in rural communities in the US. OBJECTIVE: To assess rural hospital administrators’ beliefs about safety, financial viability, and community need for offering obstetric care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the American Hospital Association Annual Survey to identify rural hospitals with obstetric units, we developed and conducted a national survey of a sample of rural hospitals that provided obstetric services in 2021. Obstetric unit managers or administrators at 292 rural hospitals providing obstetric services were surveyed from March to August 2021. EXPOSURES: Local factors, clinical safety, workforce, and financial considerations for obstetric services at participating hospitals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital-level decisions on maintaining obstetric care. RESULTS: Of the 93 total responding hospitals (32% response rate), 33 (35.5%) were critical access hospitals, 60 (64.5%) were located in micropolitan rural counties; they had a median (IQR) average daily census of 22 (10-53) patients, and 48 (52.2%) had experienced a recent decline in births, with a median (IQR) of 274 (120-446) births in 2019. Respondents reported that the minimum number of annual births needed to safely provide obstetric care was 200 (IQR, 100-350). From a financial perspective, the minimum number of annual births needed was also 200 (IQR, 120-360). When making decisions about maintaining obstetric care, 51 (64.6%) responding hospitals listed their highest priority as meeting local community needs, 13 (16.5%) listed financial considerations, and 10 (12.7%) listed staffing. Overall, 23 (25%) responding hospitals were not sure they would continue providing obstetrics, or they expected to stop offering this service. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this survey of US rural hospitals that offer obstetric services, many administrators indicated prioritizing local community needs for obstetric care over concerns about financial viability and staffing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8956977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89569772022-04-12 Rural Hospital Administrators’ Beliefs About Safety, Financial Viability, and Community Need for Offering Obstetric Care Kozhimannil, Katy B. Interrante, Julia D. Admon, Lindsay K. Basile Ibrahim, Bridget L. JAMA Health Forum Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Rural obstetric unit closures are associated with adverse maternal and infant health outcomes and are most common among low–birth volume facilities located in remote areas. Declining access to obstetric care is a concern in rural communities in the US. OBJECTIVE: To assess rural hospital administrators’ beliefs about safety, financial viability, and community need for offering obstetric care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the American Hospital Association Annual Survey to identify rural hospitals with obstetric units, we developed and conducted a national survey of a sample of rural hospitals that provided obstetric services in 2021. Obstetric unit managers or administrators at 292 rural hospitals providing obstetric services were surveyed from March to August 2021. EXPOSURES: Local factors, clinical safety, workforce, and financial considerations for obstetric services at participating hospitals. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hospital-level decisions on maintaining obstetric care. RESULTS: Of the 93 total responding hospitals (32% response rate), 33 (35.5%) were critical access hospitals, 60 (64.5%) were located in micropolitan rural counties; they had a median (IQR) average daily census of 22 (10-53) patients, and 48 (52.2%) had experienced a recent decline in births, with a median (IQR) of 274 (120-446) births in 2019. Respondents reported that the minimum number of annual births needed to safely provide obstetric care was 200 (IQR, 100-350). From a financial perspective, the minimum number of annual births needed was also 200 (IQR, 120-360). When making decisions about maintaining obstetric care, 51 (64.6%) responding hospitals listed their highest priority as meeting local community needs, 13 (16.5%) listed financial considerations, and 10 (12.7%) listed staffing. Overall, 23 (25%) responding hospitals were not sure they would continue providing obstetrics, or they expected to stop offering this service. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this survey of US rural hospitals that offer obstetric services, many administrators indicated prioritizing local community needs for obstetric care over concerns about financial viability and staffing. American Medical Association 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8956977/ /pubmed/35977287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0204 Text en Copyright 2022 Kozhimannil KB et al. JAMA Health Forum. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Kozhimannil, Katy B.
Interrante, Julia D.
Admon, Lindsay K.
Basile Ibrahim, Bridget L.
Rural Hospital Administrators’ Beliefs About Safety, Financial Viability, and Community Need for Offering Obstetric Care
title Rural Hospital Administrators’ Beliefs About Safety, Financial Viability, and Community Need for Offering Obstetric Care
title_full Rural Hospital Administrators’ Beliefs About Safety, Financial Viability, and Community Need for Offering Obstetric Care
title_fullStr Rural Hospital Administrators’ Beliefs About Safety, Financial Viability, and Community Need for Offering Obstetric Care
title_full_unstemmed Rural Hospital Administrators’ Beliefs About Safety, Financial Viability, and Community Need for Offering Obstetric Care
title_short Rural Hospital Administrators’ Beliefs About Safety, Financial Viability, and Community Need for Offering Obstetric Care
title_sort rural hospital administrators’ beliefs about safety, financial viability, and community need for offering obstetric care
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8956977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35977287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0204
work_keys_str_mv AT kozhimannilkatyb ruralhospitaladministratorsbeliefsaboutsafetyfinancialviabilityandcommunityneedforofferingobstetriccare
AT interrantejuliad ruralhospitaladministratorsbeliefsaboutsafetyfinancialviabilityandcommunityneedforofferingobstetriccare
AT admonlindsayk ruralhospitaladministratorsbeliefsaboutsafetyfinancialviabilityandcommunityneedforofferingobstetriccare
AT basileibrahimbridgetl ruralhospitaladministratorsbeliefsaboutsafetyfinancialviabilityandcommunityneedforofferingobstetriccare