Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China

BACKGROUND: Fixed dose dual bronchodilators such as long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) plus long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) are a new and important inhaled preparation for COPD treatment in China. Among these, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VIL) is increasingly being used in China, especially...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lan, Ying, Yang, Nan, Wang, Yirong, Yang, Yujie, Xu, Min, He, Qin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345479
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S350218
_version_ 1784676736986775552
author Lan, Ying
Yang, Nan
Wang, Yirong
Yang, Yujie
Xu, Min
He, Qin
author_facet Lan, Ying
Yang, Nan
Wang, Yirong
Yang, Yujie
Xu, Min
He, Qin
author_sort Lan, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fixed dose dual bronchodilators such as long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) plus long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) are a new and important inhaled preparation for COPD treatment in China. Among these, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VIL) is increasingly being used in China, especially among the elderly. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of maintenance treatment with UMEC/VIL compared with salmeterol/fluticasone (FSC) as one of the main therapeutic drugs for moderate to very severe COPD in China. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate the costs and outcomes from a societal perspective in a 10-year time horizon. Patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD were treated with UMEC/VIL (62.5/25µg) or FSC (50/500ug). Data concerning clinical efficacy, costs, utilities, transition probability, exacerbation rate, and mortality were obtained from the published literature and official government datasets. The costs were presented in US dollars based on 2021 prices. The indicators of total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and mortality were used as the model output. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 5% annual rate. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated considering the threshold recommended by WHO. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the stability of results. RESULTS: Compared with FSC, treatment with UMEC/VIL could save $1947.18, with a gain of 0.12 life-years and 0.05 QALYs. Further, 28.0% patients treated with UMEC/VIL and 29.2% patients treated with FSC were predicted to die after 10 years. Incremental cost effectiveness analysis showed that UMEC/VIL was dominant to FSC. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the results were robust. CONCLUSION: UMEC/VIL is a cost-effective treatment option compared with FSC among patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8957300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89573002022-03-27 Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China Lan, Ying Yang, Nan Wang, Yirong Yang, Yujie Xu, Min He, Qin Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Fixed dose dual bronchodilators such as long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) plus long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) are a new and important inhaled preparation for COPD treatment in China. Among these, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VIL) is increasingly being used in China, especially among the elderly. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of maintenance treatment with UMEC/VIL compared with salmeterol/fluticasone (FSC) as one of the main therapeutic drugs for moderate to very severe COPD in China. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate the costs and outcomes from a societal perspective in a 10-year time horizon. Patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD were treated with UMEC/VIL (62.5/25µg) or FSC (50/500ug). Data concerning clinical efficacy, costs, utilities, transition probability, exacerbation rate, and mortality were obtained from the published literature and official government datasets. The costs were presented in US dollars based on 2021 prices. The indicators of total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and mortality were used as the model output. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 5% annual rate. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated considering the threshold recommended by WHO. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the stability of results. RESULTS: Compared with FSC, treatment with UMEC/VIL could save $1947.18, with a gain of 0.12 life-years and 0.05 QALYs. Further, 28.0% patients treated with UMEC/VIL and 29.2% patients treated with FSC were predicted to die after 10 years. Incremental cost effectiveness analysis showed that UMEC/VIL was dominant to FSC. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the results were robust. CONCLUSION: UMEC/VIL is a cost-effective treatment option compared with FSC among patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. Dove 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8957300/ /pubmed/35345479 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S350218 Text en © 2022 Lan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lan, Ying
Yang, Nan
Wang, Yirong
Yang, Yujie
Xu, Min
He, Qin
Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China
title Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China
title_sort cost-effectiveness of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases in china
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345479
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S350218
work_keys_str_mv AT lanying costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina
AT yangnan costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina
AT wangyirong costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina
AT yangyujie costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina
AT xumin costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina
AT heqin costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina