Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China
BACKGROUND: Fixed dose dual bronchodilators such as long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) plus long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) are a new and important inhaled preparation for COPD treatment in China. Among these, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VIL) is increasingly being used in China, especially...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345479 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S350218 |
_version_ | 1784676736986775552 |
---|---|
author | Lan, Ying Yang, Nan Wang, Yirong Yang, Yujie Xu, Min He, Qin |
author_facet | Lan, Ying Yang, Nan Wang, Yirong Yang, Yujie Xu, Min He, Qin |
author_sort | Lan, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fixed dose dual bronchodilators such as long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) plus long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) are a new and important inhaled preparation for COPD treatment in China. Among these, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VIL) is increasingly being used in China, especially among the elderly. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of maintenance treatment with UMEC/VIL compared with salmeterol/fluticasone (FSC) as one of the main therapeutic drugs for moderate to very severe COPD in China. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate the costs and outcomes from a societal perspective in a 10-year time horizon. Patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD were treated with UMEC/VIL (62.5/25µg) or FSC (50/500ug). Data concerning clinical efficacy, costs, utilities, transition probability, exacerbation rate, and mortality were obtained from the published literature and official government datasets. The costs were presented in US dollars based on 2021 prices. The indicators of total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and mortality were used as the model output. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 5% annual rate. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated considering the threshold recommended by WHO. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the stability of results. RESULTS: Compared with FSC, treatment with UMEC/VIL could save $1947.18, with a gain of 0.12 life-years and 0.05 QALYs. Further, 28.0% patients treated with UMEC/VIL and 29.2% patients treated with FSC were predicted to die after 10 years. Incremental cost effectiveness analysis showed that UMEC/VIL was dominant to FSC. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the results were robust. CONCLUSION: UMEC/VIL is a cost-effective treatment option compared with FSC among patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8957300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89573002022-03-27 Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China Lan, Ying Yang, Nan Wang, Yirong Yang, Yujie Xu, Min He, Qin Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Fixed dose dual bronchodilators such as long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) plus long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) are a new and important inhaled preparation for COPD treatment in China. Among these, umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VIL) is increasingly being used in China, especially among the elderly. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of maintenance treatment with UMEC/VIL compared with salmeterol/fluticasone (FSC) as one of the main therapeutic drugs for moderate to very severe COPD in China. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to estimate the costs and outcomes from a societal perspective in a 10-year time horizon. Patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD were treated with UMEC/VIL (62.5/25µg) or FSC (50/500ug). Data concerning clinical efficacy, costs, utilities, transition probability, exacerbation rate, and mortality were obtained from the published literature and official government datasets. The costs were presented in US dollars based on 2021 prices. The indicators of total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and mortality were used as the model output. Costs and outcomes were discounted at a 5% annual rate. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated considering the threshold recommended by WHO. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the stability of results. RESULTS: Compared with FSC, treatment with UMEC/VIL could save $1947.18, with a gain of 0.12 life-years and 0.05 QALYs. Further, 28.0% patients treated with UMEC/VIL and 29.2% patients treated with FSC were predicted to die after 10 years. Incremental cost effectiveness analysis showed that UMEC/VIL was dominant to FSC. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that the results were robust. CONCLUSION: UMEC/VIL is a cost-effective treatment option compared with FSC among patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD. Dove 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8957300/ /pubmed/35345479 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S350218 Text en © 2022 Lan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lan, Ying Yang, Nan Wang, Yirong Yang, Yujie Xu, Min He, Qin Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China |
title | Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Salmeterol/Fluticasone in Elderly Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases in China |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus salmeterol/fluticasone in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases in china |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345479 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S350218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lanying costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina AT yangnan costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina AT wangyirong costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina AT yangyujie costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina AT xumin costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina AT heqin costeffectivenessofumeclidiniumvilanterolversussalmeterolfluticasoneinelderlypatientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesinchina |