Cargando…
Comparison of 3D Conformal Proton Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma
BACKGROUND: External beam radiation therapy (RT) for retroperitoneal sarcoma often requires treatment of large target volumes close to critical normal tissues. Radiation may be limited by adjacent organs at risk (OAR). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy has been shown to improve target coverage a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5540615 |
_version_ | 1784676769618460672 |
---|---|
author | Chung, Christine Trofimov, Alexei Adams, Judith Kung, Jong Kirsch, David G. Yoon, Sam Doppke, Karen Bortfeld, Thomas Delaney, Thomas F. |
author_facet | Chung, Christine Trofimov, Alexei Adams, Judith Kung, Jong Kirsch, David G. Yoon, Sam Doppke, Karen Bortfeld, Thomas Delaney, Thomas F. |
author_sort | Chung, Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: External beam radiation therapy (RT) for retroperitoneal sarcoma often requires treatment of large target volumes close to critical normal tissues. Radiation may be limited by adjacent organs at risk (OAR). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy has been shown to improve target coverage and reduce doses to OAR. OBJECTIVES: To compare target coverage and dose to OAR with 3D conformal proton therapy (3D CPT), intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMXT). METHODS: We performed a comparative study of treatment plans with 3D CPT, IMPT, and IMXT for ten patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas. RT was delivered to 50.4 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV), the structures considered at risk for microscopic disease. RESULTS: CTVs ranged from 74 to 357 cc (mean 188 cc). Dose conformity was improved with IMPT, while 3D CPT provided better dose homogeneity. Mean dose to the liver, small bowel, and stomach was reduced with IMPT compared with 3D CPT or IMXT. CONCLUSIONS: IMPT, 3D CPT, and IMXT provide excellent target coverage for retroperitoneal sarcomas. OAR dose is lower with IMPT and 3D CPT, and IMPT achieves the closest conformity. These techniques offer the opportunity for further dose escalation to areas with positive margins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8957461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89574612022-03-27 Comparison of 3D Conformal Proton Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Chung, Christine Trofimov, Alexei Adams, Judith Kung, Jong Kirsch, David G. Yoon, Sam Doppke, Karen Bortfeld, Thomas Delaney, Thomas F. Sarcoma Research Article BACKGROUND: External beam radiation therapy (RT) for retroperitoneal sarcoma often requires treatment of large target volumes close to critical normal tissues. Radiation may be limited by adjacent organs at risk (OAR). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy has been shown to improve target coverage and reduce doses to OAR. OBJECTIVES: To compare target coverage and dose to OAR with 3D conformal proton therapy (3D CPT), intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMXT). METHODS: We performed a comparative study of treatment plans with 3D CPT, IMPT, and IMXT for ten patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas. RT was delivered to 50.4 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV), the structures considered at risk for microscopic disease. RESULTS: CTVs ranged from 74 to 357 cc (mean 188 cc). Dose conformity was improved with IMPT, while 3D CPT provided better dose homogeneity. Mean dose to the liver, small bowel, and stomach was reduced with IMPT compared with 3D CPT or IMXT. CONCLUSIONS: IMPT, 3D CPT, and IMXT provide excellent target coverage for retroperitoneal sarcomas. OAR dose is lower with IMPT and 3D CPT, and IMPT achieves the closest conformity. These techniques offer the opportunity for further dose escalation to areas with positive margins. Hindawi 2022-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8957461/ /pubmed/35345672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5540615 Text en Copyright © 2022 Christine Chung et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chung, Christine Trofimov, Alexei Adams, Judith Kung, Jong Kirsch, David G. Yoon, Sam Doppke, Karen Bortfeld, Thomas Delaney, Thomas F. Comparison of 3D Conformal Proton Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma |
title | Comparison of 3D Conformal Proton Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma |
title_full | Comparison of 3D Conformal Proton Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 3D Conformal Proton Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 3D Conformal Proton Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma |
title_short | Comparison of 3D Conformal Proton Therapy, Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy, and Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma |
title_sort | comparison of 3d conformal proton therapy, intensity-modulated proton therapy, and intensity-modulated photon therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35345672 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5540615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chungchristine comparisonof3dconformalprotontherapyintensitymodulatedprotontherapyandintensitymodulatedphotontherapyforretroperitonealsarcoma AT trofimovalexei comparisonof3dconformalprotontherapyintensitymodulatedprotontherapyandintensitymodulatedphotontherapyforretroperitonealsarcoma AT adamsjudith comparisonof3dconformalprotontherapyintensitymodulatedprotontherapyandintensitymodulatedphotontherapyforretroperitonealsarcoma AT kungjong comparisonof3dconformalprotontherapyintensitymodulatedprotontherapyandintensitymodulatedphotontherapyforretroperitonealsarcoma AT kirschdavidg comparisonof3dconformalprotontherapyintensitymodulatedprotontherapyandintensitymodulatedphotontherapyforretroperitonealsarcoma AT yoonsam comparisonof3dconformalprotontherapyintensitymodulatedprotontherapyandintensitymodulatedphotontherapyforretroperitonealsarcoma AT doppkekaren comparisonof3dconformalprotontherapyintensitymodulatedprotontherapyandintensitymodulatedphotontherapyforretroperitonealsarcoma AT bortfeldthomas comparisonof3dconformalprotontherapyintensitymodulatedprotontherapyandintensitymodulatedphotontherapyforretroperitonealsarcoma AT delaneythomasf comparisonof3dconformalprotontherapyintensitymodulatedprotontherapyandintensitymodulatedphotontherapyforretroperitonealsarcoma |