Cargando…

Expectations of a new opt‐out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study

INTRODUCTION: In 2020 England moved to an opt‐out deceased donation law. We aimed to investigate the views of a mixed stakeholder group comprising people with kidney disease, family members and healthcare practitioners towards the change in legislation. We investigated the expected impacts of the ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Pippa K., Lyons, Hannah, Caskey, Fergus J., Ben‐Shlomo, Yoav, Al‐Talib, Mohammed, Babu, Adarsh, Selman, Lucy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34951093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13394
_version_ 1784676797698277376
author Bailey, Pippa K.
Lyons, Hannah
Caskey, Fergus J.
Ben‐Shlomo, Yoav
Al‐Talib, Mohammed
Babu, Adarsh
Selman, Lucy E.
author_facet Bailey, Pippa K.
Lyons, Hannah
Caskey, Fergus J.
Ben‐Shlomo, Yoav
Al‐Talib, Mohammed
Babu, Adarsh
Selman, Lucy E.
author_sort Bailey, Pippa K.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In 2020 England moved to an opt‐out deceased donation law. We aimed to investigate the views of a mixed stakeholder group comprising people with kidney disease, family members and healthcare practitioners towards the change in legislation. We investigated the expected impacts of the new legislation on deceased‐donor and living‐donor transplantation, and views on media campaigns regarding the law change. METHODS: We undertook in‐depth qualitative interviews with people with kidney disease (n = 13), their family members (n = 4) and healthcare practitioners (n = 15). Purposive sampling was used to ensure diversity for patients and healthcare practitioners. Family members were recruited through snowball sampling and posters. Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes with six subthemes were identified: (i) Expectations of impact (Hopeful patients; Cautious healthcare professionals), (ii) Living‐donor transplantation (Divergent views; Unchanged clinical recommendations), (iii) Media campaigns (Single message; Highlighting recipient benefits). Patients expected the law change would result in more deceased‐donor transplant opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should ensure patients and families are aware of the current evidence regarding the impact of opt‐out consent: expectations of an increased likelihood of receiving a deceased‐donor transplant are not currently supported by the evidence. This may help to prevent a decline in living‐donor transplantation seen in other countries with similar legislation. Media campaigns should include a focus on the impact of organ receipt. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Two patient representatives from the Kidney Disease Health Integration Team, Primrose Granville and Soumeya Bouacida, contributed to the content and design of the study documents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8957744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89577442022-04-01 Expectations of a new opt‐out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study Bailey, Pippa K. Lyons, Hannah Caskey, Fergus J. Ben‐Shlomo, Yoav Al‐Talib, Mohammed Babu, Adarsh Selman, Lucy E. Health Expect Regular Issue Papers INTRODUCTION: In 2020 England moved to an opt‐out deceased donation law. We aimed to investigate the views of a mixed stakeholder group comprising people with kidney disease, family members and healthcare practitioners towards the change in legislation. We investigated the expected impacts of the new legislation on deceased‐donor and living‐donor transplantation, and views on media campaigns regarding the law change. METHODS: We undertook in‐depth qualitative interviews with people with kidney disease (n = 13), their family members (n = 4) and healthcare practitioners (n = 15). Purposive sampling was used to ensure diversity for patients and healthcare practitioners. Family members were recruited through snowball sampling and posters. Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes with six subthemes were identified: (i) Expectations of impact (Hopeful patients; Cautious healthcare professionals), (ii) Living‐donor transplantation (Divergent views; Unchanged clinical recommendations), (iii) Media campaigns (Single message; Highlighting recipient benefits). Patients expected the law change would result in more deceased‐donor transplant opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should ensure patients and families are aware of the current evidence regarding the impact of opt‐out consent: expectations of an increased likelihood of receiving a deceased‐donor transplant are not currently supported by the evidence. This may help to prevent a decline in living‐donor transplantation seen in other countries with similar legislation. Media campaigns should include a focus on the impact of organ receipt. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Two patient representatives from the Kidney Disease Health Integration Team, Primrose Granville and Soumeya Bouacida, contributed to the content and design of the study documents. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-24 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8957744/ /pubmed/34951093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13394 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Regular Issue Papers
Bailey, Pippa K.
Lyons, Hannah
Caskey, Fergus J.
Ben‐Shlomo, Yoav
Al‐Talib, Mohammed
Babu, Adarsh
Selman, Lucy E.
Expectations of a new opt‐out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study
title Expectations of a new opt‐out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study
title_full Expectations of a new opt‐out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Expectations of a new opt‐out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Expectations of a new opt‐out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study
title_short Expectations of a new opt‐out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study
title_sort expectations of a new opt‐out system of consent for deceased organ donation in england: a qualitative interview study
topic Regular Issue Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34951093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13394
work_keys_str_mv AT baileypippak expectationsofanewoptoutsystemofconsentfordeceasedorgandonationinenglandaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT lyonshannah expectationsofanewoptoutsystemofconsentfordeceasedorgandonationinenglandaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT caskeyfergusj expectationsofanewoptoutsystemofconsentfordeceasedorgandonationinenglandaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT benshlomoyoav expectationsofanewoptoutsystemofconsentfordeceasedorgandonationinenglandaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT altalibmohammed expectationsofanewoptoutsystemofconsentfordeceasedorgandonationinenglandaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT babuadarsh expectationsofanewoptoutsystemofconsentfordeceasedorgandonationinenglandaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT selmanlucye expectationsofanewoptoutsystemofconsentfordeceasedorgandonationinenglandaqualitativeinterviewstudy