Cargando…
Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting
OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a sepsis prediction model for the general ward setting and extend the evaluation through a novel pseudo-prospective trial design. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data extracted from electronic health records (EHR). SETTING: Single, tertiary-care academic medical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350226 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.848599 |
_version_ | 1784676807454228480 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Sean C. Gupta, Aditi Betthauser, Kevin D. Lyons, Patrick G. Lai, Albert M. Kollef, Marin H. Payne, Philip R. O. Michelson, Andrew P. |
author_facet | Yu, Sean C. Gupta, Aditi Betthauser, Kevin D. Lyons, Patrick G. Lai, Albert M. Kollef, Marin H. Payne, Philip R. O. Michelson, Andrew P. |
author_sort | Yu, Sean C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a sepsis prediction model for the general ward setting and extend the evaluation through a novel pseudo-prospective trial design. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data extracted from electronic health records (EHR). SETTING: Single, tertiary-care academic medical center in St. Louis, MO, USA. PATIENTS: Adult, non-surgical inpatients admitted between January 1, 2012 and June 1, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 70,034 included patient encounters, 3.1% were septic based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. Features were generated from the EHR data and were used to develop a machine learning model to predict sepsis 6-h ahead of onset. The best performing model had an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC or c-statistic) of 0.862 ± 0.011 and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.294 ± 0.021 compared to that of Logistic Regression (0.857 ± 0.008 and 0.256 ± 0.024) and NEWS 2 (0.699 ± 0.012 and 0.092 ± 0.009). In the pseudo-prospective trial, 388 (69.7%) septic patients were alerted on with a specificity of 81.4%. Within 24 h of crossing the alert threshold, 20.9% had a sepsis-related event occur. CONCLUSIONS: A machine learning model capable of predicting sepsis in the general ward setting was developed using the EHR data. The pseudo-prospective trial provided a more realistic estimation of implemented performance and demonstrated a 29.1% Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for sepsis-related intervention or outcome within 48 h. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8957791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89577912022-03-28 Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting Yu, Sean C. Gupta, Aditi Betthauser, Kevin D. Lyons, Patrick G. Lai, Albert M. Kollef, Marin H. Payne, Philip R. O. Michelson, Andrew P. Front Digit Health Digital Health OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a sepsis prediction model for the general ward setting and extend the evaluation through a novel pseudo-prospective trial design. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data extracted from electronic health records (EHR). SETTING: Single, tertiary-care academic medical center in St. Louis, MO, USA. PATIENTS: Adult, non-surgical inpatients admitted between January 1, 2012 and June 1, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 70,034 included patient encounters, 3.1% were septic based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. Features were generated from the EHR data and were used to develop a machine learning model to predict sepsis 6-h ahead of onset. The best performing model had an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC or c-statistic) of 0.862 ± 0.011 and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.294 ± 0.021 compared to that of Logistic Regression (0.857 ± 0.008 and 0.256 ± 0.024) and NEWS 2 (0.699 ± 0.012 and 0.092 ± 0.009). In the pseudo-prospective trial, 388 (69.7%) septic patients were alerted on with a specificity of 81.4%. Within 24 h of crossing the alert threshold, 20.9% had a sepsis-related event occur. CONCLUSIONS: A machine learning model capable of predicting sepsis in the general ward setting was developed using the EHR data. The pseudo-prospective trial provided a more realistic estimation of implemented performance and demonstrated a 29.1% Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for sepsis-related intervention or outcome within 48 h. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8957791/ /pubmed/35350226 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.848599 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yu, Gupta, Betthauser, Lyons, Lai, Kollef, Payne and Michelson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Digital Health Yu, Sean C. Gupta, Aditi Betthauser, Kevin D. Lyons, Patrick G. Lai, Albert M. Kollef, Marin H. Payne, Philip R. O. Michelson, Andrew P. Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting |
title | Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting |
title_full | Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting |
title_fullStr | Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting |
title_short | Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting |
title_sort | sepsis prediction for the general ward setting |
topic | Digital Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350226 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.848599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuseanc sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting AT guptaaditi sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting AT betthauserkevind sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting AT lyonspatrickg sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting AT laialbertm sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting AT kollefmarinh sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting AT paynephilipro sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting AT michelsonandrewp sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting |