Cargando…

Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a sepsis prediction model for the general ward setting and extend the evaluation through a novel pseudo-prospective trial design. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data extracted from electronic health records (EHR). SETTING: Single, tertiary-care academic medical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Sean C., Gupta, Aditi, Betthauser, Kevin D., Lyons, Patrick G., Lai, Albert M., Kollef, Marin H., Payne, Philip R. O., Michelson, Andrew P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350226
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.848599
_version_ 1784676807454228480
author Yu, Sean C.
Gupta, Aditi
Betthauser, Kevin D.
Lyons, Patrick G.
Lai, Albert M.
Kollef, Marin H.
Payne, Philip R. O.
Michelson, Andrew P.
author_facet Yu, Sean C.
Gupta, Aditi
Betthauser, Kevin D.
Lyons, Patrick G.
Lai, Albert M.
Kollef, Marin H.
Payne, Philip R. O.
Michelson, Andrew P.
author_sort Yu, Sean C.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a sepsis prediction model for the general ward setting and extend the evaluation through a novel pseudo-prospective trial design. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data extracted from electronic health records (EHR). SETTING: Single, tertiary-care academic medical center in St. Louis, MO, USA. PATIENTS: Adult, non-surgical inpatients admitted between January 1, 2012 and June 1, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 70,034 included patient encounters, 3.1% were septic based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. Features were generated from the EHR data and were used to develop a machine learning model to predict sepsis 6-h ahead of onset. The best performing model had an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC or c-statistic) of 0.862 ± 0.011 and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.294 ± 0.021 compared to that of Logistic Regression (0.857 ± 0.008 and 0.256 ± 0.024) and NEWS 2 (0.699 ± 0.012 and 0.092 ± 0.009). In the pseudo-prospective trial, 388 (69.7%) septic patients were alerted on with a specificity of 81.4%. Within 24 h of crossing the alert threshold, 20.9% had a sepsis-related event occur. CONCLUSIONS: A machine learning model capable of predicting sepsis in the general ward setting was developed using the EHR data. The pseudo-prospective trial provided a more realistic estimation of implemented performance and demonstrated a 29.1% Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for sepsis-related intervention or outcome within 48 h.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8957791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89577912022-03-28 Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting Yu, Sean C. Gupta, Aditi Betthauser, Kevin D. Lyons, Patrick G. Lai, Albert M. Kollef, Marin H. Payne, Philip R. O. Michelson, Andrew P. Front Digit Health Digital Health OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a sepsis prediction model for the general ward setting and extend the evaluation through a novel pseudo-prospective trial design. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data extracted from electronic health records (EHR). SETTING: Single, tertiary-care academic medical center in St. Louis, MO, USA. PATIENTS: Adult, non-surgical inpatients admitted between January 1, 2012 and June 1, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 70,034 included patient encounters, 3.1% were septic based on the Sepsis-3 criteria. Features were generated from the EHR data and were used to develop a machine learning model to predict sepsis 6-h ahead of onset. The best performing model had an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC or c-statistic) of 0.862 ± 0.011 and Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.294 ± 0.021 compared to that of Logistic Regression (0.857 ± 0.008 and 0.256 ± 0.024) and NEWS 2 (0.699 ± 0.012 and 0.092 ± 0.009). In the pseudo-prospective trial, 388 (69.7%) septic patients were alerted on with a specificity of 81.4%. Within 24 h of crossing the alert threshold, 20.9% had a sepsis-related event occur. CONCLUSIONS: A machine learning model capable of predicting sepsis in the general ward setting was developed using the EHR data. The pseudo-prospective trial provided a more realistic estimation of implemented performance and demonstrated a 29.1% Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for sepsis-related intervention or outcome within 48 h. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8957791/ /pubmed/35350226 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.848599 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yu, Gupta, Betthauser, Lyons, Lai, Kollef, Payne and Michelson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Digital Health
Yu, Sean C.
Gupta, Aditi
Betthauser, Kevin D.
Lyons, Patrick G.
Lai, Albert M.
Kollef, Marin H.
Payne, Philip R. O.
Michelson, Andrew P.
Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting
title Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting
title_full Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting
title_fullStr Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting
title_full_unstemmed Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting
title_short Sepsis Prediction for the General Ward Setting
title_sort sepsis prediction for the general ward setting
topic Digital Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350226
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.848599
work_keys_str_mv AT yuseanc sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting
AT guptaaditi sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting
AT betthauserkevind sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting
AT lyonspatrickg sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting
AT laialbertm sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting
AT kollefmarinh sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting
AT paynephilipro sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting
AT michelsonandrewp sepsispredictionforthegeneralwardsetting