Cargando…

Implementation of a Spatially-Variant and Tissue-Dependent Positron Range Correction for PET/CT Imaging

AIM: To develop and evaluate a new approach for spatially variant and tissue-dependent positron range (PR) correction (PRC) during the iterative PET image reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PR distributions of three radionuclides ((18)F, (68)Ga, and (124)I) were simulated using the GATE (GEA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kertész, Hunor, Beyer, Thomas, Panin, Vladimir, Jentzen, Walter, Cal-Gonzalez, Jacobo, Berger, Alexander, Papp, Laszlo, Kench, Peter L., Bharkhada, Deepak, Cabello, Jorge, Conti, Maurizio, Rausch, Ivo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35350691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.818463
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To develop and evaluate a new approach for spatially variant and tissue-dependent positron range (PR) correction (PRC) during the iterative PET image reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PR distributions of three radionuclides ((18)F, (68)Ga, and (124)I) were simulated using the GATE (GEANT4) framework in different material compositions (lung, water, and bone). For every radionuclide, the uniform PR kernel was created by mapping the simulated 3D PR point cloud to a 3D matrix with its size defined by the maximum PR in lung ((18)F) or water ((68)Ga and (124)I) and the PET voxel size. The spatially variant kernels were composed from the uniform PR kernels by analyzing the material composition of the surrounding medium for each voxel before implementation as tissue-dependent, point-spread functions into the iterative image reconstruction. The proposed PRC method was evaluated using the NEMA image quality phantom ((18)F, (68)Ga, and (124)I); two unique PR phantoms were scanned and evaluated following OSEM reconstruction with and without PRC using different metrics, such as contrast recovery, contrast-to-noise ratio, image noise and the resolution evaluated in terms of full width at half maximum (FWHM). RESULTS: The effect of PRC on (18)F-imaging was negligible. In contrast, PRC improved image contrast for the 10-mm sphere of the NEMA image quality phantom filled with (68)Ga and (124)I by 33 and 24%, respectively. While the effect of PRC was less noticeable for the larger spheres, contrast recovery still improved by 5%. The spatial resolution was improved by 26% for (124)I (FWHM of 4.9 vs. 3.7 mm). CONCLUSION: For high energy positron-emitting radionuclides, the proposed PRC method helped recover image contrast with reduced noise levels and with improved spatial resolution. As such, the PRC approach proposed here can help improve the quality of PET data in clinical practice and research.