Cargando…

A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity

Background: Studies on safety culture maturity in health care is very rare, and the existing ones only focus on patients and the use of Manchester Patients Safety Framework (MaPSaF) instrument. The objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive instrument for measuring safety culture maturity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liana, Duta, Lestari, Fatma, Sutoto, Sutoto, Modjo, Robiana, Bachtiar, Adang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35266370
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2022.2530
_version_ 1784676943240626176
author Liana, Duta
Lestari, Fatma
Sutoto, Sutoto
Modjo, Robiana
Bachtiar, Adang
author_facet Liana, Duta
Lestari, Fatma
Sutoto, Sutoto
Modjo, Robiana
Bachtiar, Adang
author_sort Liana, Duta
collection PubMed
description Background: Studies on safety culture maturity in health care is very rare, and the existing ones only focus on patients and the use of Manchester Patients Safety Framework (MaPSaF) instrument. The objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive instrument for measuring safety culture maturity in hospitals. Design and methods: This study used a cross-sectional design with three stages. First, we used secondary data analysis from the Hospital Accreditation Commission. Second, evaluation of primary data obtained from safety climate questionnaire. Third, we did focus group discussions, and in-depth interviews for validation of secondary data and development of DUTA-RS website. We analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) test. Results: DUTA-RS instrument contains 1,118 elements based on the first edition of the Indonesian Hospital Accreditation National Standard. Its safety culture maturity is at the proactive level (58.0%), with the highest accreditation levels of proactive (50.8%) and generative (48.7%). The variables affecting the safety culture maturity are situational and safety behavior variables, with leadership, risk management, and safety compliance as the strongest indicators. The weakest indicators of climate are organizational learning and communication. The mean value of climate for primary and secondary data is in the good category and showed in proactive level. Conclusions: The DUTA-RS as a website to measure the safety culture maturity in accredited hospitals by taking the advantage of the existing information technology of hospital accreditation committee as the benchmark enables improvement of SCML in hospitals. Further studies are required for the development of DUTA-RS website.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8958441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89584412022-03-29 A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity Liana, Duta Lestari, Fatma Sutoto, Sutoto Modjo, Robiana Bachtiar, Adang J Public Health Res Article Background: Studies on safety culture maturity in health care is very rare, and the existing ones only focus on patients and the use of Manchester Patients Safety Framework (MaPSaF) instrument. The objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive instrument for measuring safety culture maturity in hospitals. Design and methods: This study used a cross-sectional design with three stages. First, we used secondary data analysis from the Hospital Accreditation Commission. Second, evaluation of primary data obtained from safety climate questionnaire. Third, we did focus group discussions, and in-depth interviews for validation of secondary data and development of DUTA-RS website. We analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) test. Results: DUTA-RS instrument contains 1,118 elements based on the first edition of the Indonesian Hospital Accreditation National Standard. Its safety culture maturity is at the proactive level (58.0%), with the highest accreditation levels of proactive (50.8%) and generative (48.7%). The variables affecting the safety culture maturity are situational and safety behavior variables, with leadership, risk management, and safety compliance as the strongest indicators. The weakest indicators of climate are organizational learning and communication. The mean value of climate for primary and secondary data is in the good category and showed in proactive level. Conclusions: The DUTA-RS as a website to measure the safety culture maturity in accredited hospitals by taking the advantage of the existing information technology of hospital accreditation committee as the benchmark enables improvement of SCML in hospitals. Further studies are required for the development of DUTA-RS website. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8958441/ /pubmed/35266370 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2022.2530 Text en ©Copyright: the Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Liana, Duta
Lestari, Fatma
Sutoto, Sutoto
Modjo, Robiana
Bachtiar, Adang
A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity
title A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity
title_full A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity
title_fullStr A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity
title_full_unstemmed A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity
title_short A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity
title_sort self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35266370
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2022.2530
work_keys_str_mv AT lianaduta aselfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity
AT lestarifatma aselfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity
AT sutotosutoto aselfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity
AT modjorobiana aselfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity
AT bachtiaradang aselfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity
AT lianaduta selfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity
AT lestarifatma selfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity
AT sutotosutoto selfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity
AT modjorobiana selfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity
AT bachtiaradang selfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity