Cargando…
A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity
Background: Studies on safety culture maturity in health care is very rare, and the existing ones only focus on patients and the use of Manchester Patients Safety Framework (MaPSaF) instrument. The objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive instrument for measuring safety culture maturity...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35266370 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2022.2530 |
_version_ | 1784676943240626176 |
---|---|
author | Liana, Duta Lestari, Fatma Sutoto, Sutoto Modjo, Robiana Bachtiar, Adang |
author_facet | Liana, Duta Lestari, Fatma Sutoto, Sutoto Modjo, Robiana Bachtiar, Adang |
author_sort | Liana, Duta |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Studies on safety culture maturity in health care is very rare, and the existing ones only focus on patients and the use of Manchester Patients Safety Framework (MaPSaF) instrument. The objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive instrument for measuring safety culture maturity in hospitals. Design and methods: This study used a cross-sectional design with three stages. First, we used secondary data analysis from the Hospital Accreditation Commission. Second, evaluation of primary data obtained from safety climate questionnaire. Third, we did focus group discussions, and in-depth interviews for validation of secondary data and development of DUTA-RS website. We analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) test. Results: DUTA-RS instrument contains 1,118 elements based on the first edition of the Indonesian Hospital Accreditation National Standard. Its safety culture maturity is at the proactive level (58.0%), with the highest accreditation levels of proactive (50.8%) and generative (48.7%). The variables affecting the safety culture maturity are situational and safety behavior variables, with leadership, risk management, and safety compliance as the strongest indicators. The weakest indicators of climate are organizational learning and communication. The mean value of climate for primary and secondary data is in the good category and showed in proactive level. Conclusions: The DUTA-RS as a website to measure the safety culture maturity in accredited hospitals by taking the advantage of the existing information technology of hospital accreditation committee as the benchmark enables improvement of SCML in hospitals. Further studies are required for the development of DUTA-RS website. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8958441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89584412022-03-29 A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity Liana, Duta Lestari, Fatma Sutoto, Sutoto Modjo, Robiana Bachtiar, Adang J Public Health Res Article Background: Studies on safety culture maturity in health care is very rare, and the existing ones only focus on patients and the use of Manchester Patients Safety Framework (MaPSaF) instrument. The objective of this study is to develop a comprehensive instrument for measuring safety culture maturity in hospitals. Design and methods: This study used a cross-sectional design with three stages. First, we used secondary data analysis from the Hospital Accreditation Commission. Second, evaluation of primary data obtained from safety climate questionnaire. Third, we did focus group discussions, and in-depth interviews for validation of secondary data and development of DUTA-RS website. We analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) test. Results: DUTA-RS instrument contains 1,118 elements based on the first edition of the Indonesian Hospital Accreditation National Standard. Its safety culture maturity is at the proactive level (58.0%), with the highest accreditation levels of proactive (50.8%) and generative (48.7%). The variables affecting the safety culture maturity are situational and safety behavior variables, with leadership, risk management, and safety compliance as the strongest indicators. The weakest indicators of climate are organizational learning and communication. The mean value of climate for primary and secondary data is in the good category and showed in proactive level. Conclusions: The DUTA-RS as a website to measure the safety culture maturity in accredited hospitals by taking the advantage of the existing information technology of hospital accreditation committee as the benchmark enables improvement of SCML in hospitals. Further studies are required for the development of DUTA-RS website. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8958441/ /pubmed/35266370 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2022.2530 Text en ©Copyright: the Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Liana, Duta Lestari, Fatma Sutoto, Sutoto Modjo, Robiana Bachtiar, Adang A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity |
title | A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity |
title_full | A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity |
title_fullStr | A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity |
title_full_unstemmed | A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity |
title_short | A self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity |
title_sort | self-assessment model for hospital safety culture maturity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35266370 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2022.2530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lianaduta aselfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity AT lestarifatma aselfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity AT sutotosutoto aselfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity AT modjorobiana aselfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity AT bachtiaradang aselfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity AT lianaduta selfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity AT lestarifatma selfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity AT sutotosutoto selfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity AT modjorobiana selfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity AT bachtiaradang selfassessmentmodelforhospitalsafetyculturematurity |