Cargando…

Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response

The spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right. Recently, a particular variant of the SNARC effect known as the attentional SNARC (which reflects that attention can b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galarraga, Diana B, Pratt, Jay, Cochrane, Brett A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218211039479
_version_ 1784676987636285440
author Galarraga, Diana B
Pratt, Jay
Cochrane, Brett A
author_facet Galarraga, Diana B
Pratt, Jay
Cochrane, Brett A
author_sort Galarraga, Diana B
collection PubMed
description The spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right. Recently, a particular variant of the SNARC effect known as the attentional SNARC (which reflects that attention can be shifted in a similar manner) has had notable replicability issues. However, a potentially useful method for measuring it was revealed by Casarotti et al. using a temporal order judgement (TOJ) task. Accordingly, the present study evaluated whether Casarotti et al.’s results were reproducible by presenting a low (1) or high (9) digit prior to a TOJ task where participants had to indicate which of two peripherally presented targets appeared first (Experiment 1) or second (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, it was revealed that the findings of Casarotti et al.’s were indeed observable upon replication. In Experiment 2, when attention and response dimensions were put in opposition, the SNARC effect corresponded to the side of response rather than attention. Taken together, the present study confirms the robustness of the attentional SNARC in TOJ tasks, but that it is not likely due to shifts in attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8958638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89586382022-03-29 Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response Galarraga, Diana B Pratt, Jay Cochrane, Brett A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles The spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right. Recently, a particular variant of the SNARC effect known as the attentional SNARC (which reflects that attention can be shifted in a similar manner) has had notable replicability issues. However, a potentially useful method for measuring it was revealed by Casarotti et al. using a temporal order judgement (TOJ) task. Accordingly, the present study evaluated whether Casarotti et al.’s results were reproducible by presenting a low (1) or high (9) digit prior to a TOJ task where participants had to indicate which of two peripherally presented targets appeared first (Experiment 1) or second (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, it was revealed that the findings of Casarotti et al.’s were indeed observable upon replication. In Experiment 2, when attention and response dimensions were put in opposition, the SNARC effect corresponded to the side of response rather than attention. Taken together, the present study confirms the robustness of the attentional SNARC in TOJ tasks, but that it is not likely due to shifts in attention. SAGE Publications 2021-08-18 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8958638/ /pubmed/34344248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218211039479 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Galarraga, Diana B
Pratt, Jay
Cochrane, Brett A
Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response
title Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response
title_full Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response
title_fullStr Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response
title_full_unstemmed Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response
title_short Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response
title_sort is the attentional snarc effect truly attentional? using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218211039479
work_keys_str_mv AT galarragadianab istheattentionalsnarceffecttrulyattentionalusingtemporalorderjudgementstodifferentiateattentionfromresponse
AT prattjay istheattentionalsnarceffecttrulyattentionalusingtemporalorderjudgementstodifferentiateattentionfromresponse
AT cochranebretta istheattentionalsnarceffecttrulyattentionalusingtemporalorderjudgementstodifferentiateattentionfromresponse