Cargando…
Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response
The spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right. Recently, a particular variant of the SNARC effect known as the attentional SNARC (which reflects that attention can b...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218211039479 |
_version_ | 1784676987636285440 |
---|---|
author | Galarraga, Diana B Pratt, Jay Cochrane, Brett A |
author_facet | Galarraga, Diana B Pratt, Jay Cochrane, Brett A |
author_sort | Galarraga, Diana B |
collection | PubMed |
description | The spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right. Recently, a particular variant of the SNARC effect known as the attentional SNARC (which reflects that attention can be shifted in a similar manner) has had notable replicability issues. However, a potentially useful method for measuring it was revealed by Casarotti et al. using a temporal order judgement (TOJ) task. Accordingly, the present study evaluated whether Casarotti et al.’s results were reproducible by presenting a low (1) or high (9) digit prior to a TOJ task where participants had to indicate which of two peripherally presented targets appeared first (Experiment 1) or second (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, it was revealed that the findings of Casarotti et al.’s were indeed observable upon replication. In Experiment 2, when attention and response dimensions were put in opposition, the SNARC effect corresponded to the side of response rather than attention. Taken together, the present study confirms the robustness of the attentional SNARC in TOJ tasks, but that it is not likely due to shifts in attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8958638 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89586382022-03-29 Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response Galarraga, Diana B Pratt, Jay Cochrane, Brett A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles The spatial–numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right. Recently, a particular variant of the SNARC effect known as the attentional SNARC (which reflects that attention can be shifted in a similar manner) has had notable replicability issues. However, a potentially useful method for measuring it was revealed by Casarotti et al. using a temporal order judgement (TOJ) task. Accordingly, the present study evaluated whether Casarotti et al.’s results were reproducible by presenting a low (1) or high (9) digit prior to a TOJ task where participants had to indicate which of two peripherally presented targets appeared first (Experiment 1) or second (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, it was revealed that the findings of Casarotti et al.’s were indeed observable upon replication. In Experiment 2, when attention and response dimensions were put in opposition, the SNARC effect corresponded to the side of response rather than attention. Taken together, the present study confirms the robustness of the attentional SNARC in TOJ tasks, but that it is not likely due to shifts in attention. SAGE Publications 2021-08-18 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8958638/ /pubmed/34344248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218211039479 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Galarraga, Diana B Pratt, Jay Cochrane, Brett A Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response |
title | Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response |
title_full | Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response |
title_fullStr | Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response |
title_short | Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response |
title_sort | is the attentional snarc effect truly attentional? using temporal order judgements to differentiate attention from response |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958638/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218211039479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galarragadianab istheattentionalsnarceffecttrulyattentionalusingtemporalorderjudgementstodifferentiateattentionfromresponse AT prattjay istheattentionalsnarceffecttrulyattentionalusingtemporalorderjudgementstodifferentiateattentionfromresponse AT cochranebretta istheattentionalsnarceffecttrulyattentionalusingtemporalorderjudgementstodifferentiateattentionfromresponse |