Cargando…
Evaluating Family Medicine Resident Narrative Comments Using the RIME Scheme
BACKGROUND: In 2013, the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) launched the Next Accreditation System, which required explicit documentation of trainee competence in six domains. To document narrative comments, the University of North Carolina Family Medicine Residency Program...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205221090162 |
_version_ | 1784676994006384640 |
---|---|
author | Folk, Destiny Ryckeley, Christian Nguyen, Michelle Essig, Jeremiah J. Beck Dallaghan, Gary L. Coe, Catherine |
author_facet | Folk, Destiny Ryckeley, Christian Nguyen, Michelle Essig, Jeremiah J. Beck Dallaghan, Gary L. Coe, Catherine |
author_sort | Folk, Destiny |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2013, the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) launched the Next Accreditation System, which required explicit documentation of trainee competence in six domains. To document narrative comments, the University of North Carolina Family Medicine Residency Program developed a mobile application to document real time observations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to assess if the Reporter, Interpreter, Manager, Expert (RIME) framework could be applied to the narrative comments in order to convey a degree of competency. METHODS: From August to December 2020, 7 individuals analyzed narrative comments of four family medicine residents. The narrative comments were collected from July to December 2019. Each individual applied the RIME framework to the comments and the team met to discuss. Comments where 5/7 individuals agreed were not further discussed. All other comments were discussed until consensus was achieved. RESULTS: 102 unique comments were assessed. Of those comments, 25 (25.5%) met threshold for assessor agreement after independent review. Group discussion about discrepancies led to consensus about the appropriate classification for 92 (90.2%). General comments on performance were difficult to fit into the RIME framework. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the RIME framework to narrative comments may add insight into trainee progress. Further faculty development is needed to ensure comments have discrete elements needed to apply the RIME framework and contribute to overall evaluation of competence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8958670 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89586702022-03-29 Evaluating Family Medicine Resident Narrative Comments Using the RIME Scheme Folk, Destiny Ryckeley, Christian Nguyen, Michelle Essig, Jeremiah J. Beck Dallaghan, Gary L. Coe, Catherine J Med Educ Curric Dev Short Report BACKGROUND: In 2013, the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) launched the Next Accreditation System, which required explicit documentation of trainee competence in six domains. To document narrative comments, the University of North Carolina Family Medicine Residency Program developed a mobile application to document real time observations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to assess if the Reporter, Interpreter, Manager, Expert (RIME) framework could be applied to the narrative comments in order to convey a degree of competency. METHODS: From August to December 2020, 7 individuals analyzed narrative comments of four family medicine residents. The narrative comments were collected from July to December 2019. Each individual applied the RIME framework to the comments and the team met to discuss. Comments where 5/7 individuals agreed were not further discussed. All other comments were discussed until consensus was achieved. RESULTS: 102 unique comments were assessed. Of those comments, 25 (25.5%) met threshold for assessor agreement after independent review. Group discussion about discrepancies led to consensus about the appropriate classification for 92 (90.2%). General comments on performance were difficult to fit into the RIME framework. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the RIME framework to narrative comments may add insight into trainee progress. Further faculty development is needed to ensure comments have discrete elements needed to apply the RIME framework and contribute to overall evaluation of competence. SAGE Publications 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8958670/ /pubmed/35356418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205221090162 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Short Report Folk, Destiny Ryckeley, Christian Nguyen, Michelle Essig, Jeremiah J. Beck Dallaghan, Gary L. Coe, Catherine Evaluating Family Medicine Resident Narrative Comments Using the RIME Scheme |
title | Evaluating Family Medicine Resident Narrative Comments Using the RIME Scheme |
title_full | Evaluating Family Medicine Resident Narrative Comments Using the RIME Scheme |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Family Medicine Resident Narrative Comments Using the RIME Scheme |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Family Medicine Resident Narrative Comments Using the RIME Scheme |
title_short | Evaluating Family Medicine Resident Narrative Comments Using the RIME Scheme |
title_sort | evaluating family medicine resident narrative comments using the rime scheme |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958670/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205221090162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT folkdestiny evaluatingfamilymedicineresidentnarrativecommentsusingtherimescheme AT ryckeleychristian evaluatingfamilymedicineresidentnarrativecommentsusingtherimescheme AT nguyenmichelle evaluatingfamilymedicineresidentnarrativecommentsusingtherimescheme AT essigjeremiahj evaluatingfamilymedicineresidentnarrativecommentsusingtherimescheme AT beckdallaghangaryl evaluatingfamilymedicineresidentnarrativecommentsusingtherimescheme AT coecatherine evaluatingfamilymedicineresidentnarrativecommentsusingtherimescheme |