Cargando…

Patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that nearly 600 000 cancer cases in the UK could have been avoided in the past 5 years if people had healthier lifestyles, with the principle modifiable risk factors being smoking, obesity, alcohol consumption, and inactivity. There is growing interest in the use of cance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blane, David N, MacDonald, Sara, O'Donnell, Catherine A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0108
_version_ 1784677009589272576
author Blane, David N
MacDonald, Sara
O'Donnell, Catherine A
author_facet Blane, David N
MacDonald, Sara
O'Donnell, Catherine A
author_sort Blane, David N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is estimated that nearly 600 000 cancer cases in the UK could have been avoided in the past 5 years if people had healthier lifestyles, with the principle modifiable risk factors being smoking, obesity, alcohol consumption, and inactivity. There is growing interest in the use of cancer risk information in general practice to encourage lifestyle modification. AIM: To explore the views and experiences of patients and practitioners in relation to cancer prevention and cancer risk discussions in general practice. DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative study among patients and practitioners in general practices in Glasgow, UK. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine practitioners (five GPs and four practice nurses, recruited purposively from practices based on list size and deprivation status), and 13 patients (aged 30–60 years, with two or more specified comorbidities). RESULTS: Currently, cancer risk discussions focus on smoking and cancer, with links between alcohol and/or obesity and cancer rarely made. There was support for the use of the personalised cancer risk tool as an additional resource in primary care. Practitioners felt practice nurses were best placed to use it. Use in planned appointments (for example, chronic disease reviews) was preferred over opportunistic use. Concerns were expressed, however, about generating anxiety, time constraints, and widening inequalities. CONCLUSION: Health behaviour change is complex and the provision of information alone is unlikely to have significant effects. Personalised risk tools may have a role, but important concerns about their use remain, particularly in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8958738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89587382022-04-07 Patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study Blane, David N MacDonald, Sara O'Donnell, Catherine A BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: It is estimated that nearly 600 000 cancer cases in the UK could have been avoided in the past 5 years if people had healthier lifestyles, with the principle modifiable risk factors being smoking, obesity, alcohol consumption, and inactivity. There is growing interest in the use of cancer risk information in general practice to encourage lifestyle modification. AIM: To explore the views and experiences of patients and practitioners in relation to cancer prevention and cancer risk discussions in general practice. DESIGN & SETTING: Qualitative study among patients and practitioners in general practices in Glasgow, UK. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine practitioners (five GPs and four practice nurses, recruited purposively from practices based on list size and deprivation status), and 13 patients (aged 30–60 years, with two or more specified comorbidities). RESULTS: Currently, cancer risk discussions focus on smoking and cancer, with links between alcohol and/or obesity and cancer rarely made. There was support for the use of the personalised cancer risk tool as an additional resource in primary care. Practitioners felt practice nurses were best placed to use it. Use in planned appointments (for example, chronic disease reviews) was preferred over opportunistic use. Concerns were expressed, however, about generating anxiety, time constraints, and widening inequalities. CONCLUSION: Health behaviour change is complex and the provision of information alone is unlikely to have significant effects. Personalised risk tools may have a role, but important concerns about their use remain, particularly in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage. Royal College of General Practitioners 2022-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8958738/ /pubmed/34645652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0108 Text en Copyright © 2022, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Blane, David N
MacDonald, Sara
O'Donnell, Catherine A
Patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study
title Patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study
title_full Patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study
title_short Patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study
title_sort patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34645652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0108
work_keys_str_mv AT blanedavidn patientandpractitionerviewsoncancerriskdiscussionsinprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT macdonaldsara patientandpractitionerviewsoncancerriskdiscussionsinprimarycareaqualitativestudy
AT odonnellcatherinea patientandpractitionerviewsoncancerriskdiscussionsinprimarycareaqualitativestudy