Cargando…

SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care

STUDY DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical pilot study. OBJECTIVES: To assess usage, perceived impact, and satisfaction with a telemedicine program among individuals with spinal cord injury (tele-SCI). SETTING: Community-based. METHODS: Participants (N = 83) were recruited from acute SCI inpatient rehabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khong, Cria-May M., Pasipanodya, Elizabeth C., Do, Jacqueline, Phan, Nathan, Solomon, Daniel L., Wong, Elyssa Y., Dirlikov, Benjamin, Shem, Kazuko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35347265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00790-1
_version_ 1784677023473467392
author Khong, Cria-May M.
Pasipanodya, Elizabeth C.
Do, Jacqueline
Phan, Nathan
Solomon, Daniel L.
Wong, Elyssa Y.
Dirlikov, Benjamin
Shem, Kazuko
author_facet Khong, Cria-May M.
Pasipanodya, Elizabeth C.
Do, Jacqueline
Phan, Nathan
Solomon, Daniel L.
Wong, Elyssa Y.
Dirlikov, Benjamin
Shem, Kazuko
author_sort Khong, Cria-May M.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical pilot study. OBJECTIVES: To assess usage, perceived impact, and satisfaction with a telemedicine program among individuals with spinal cord injury (tele-SCI). SETTING: Community-based. METHODS: Participants (N = 83) were recruited from acute SCI inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient SCI care at a community hospital to participate in a 6-month tele-SCI intervention administered by SCI subspecialty board-certified physiatrists via iPad FaceTime. In addition to monthly follow up interview calls, psychosocial and Quality of Life (QoL) measures were collected at baseline and post-intervention. A program satisfaction survey was also collected post-intervention. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of participants engaged in tele-SCI visits (Median [IQR]: 2.5 [2.0, 4.0]) for a total of 198 tele-SCI visits. Bladder and bowel concerns were the leading topics discussed during tele-SCI visits, followed by neurological, pain, and functional concerns. Tele-SCI users resided further away (Median miles [IQR] – 114[73–177] vs. 81[46–116], p = 0.023) and reported seeking more clinical advice (Median [IQR] – 1.5[0–4.0] vs. 0[0–1.0], p = 0.002) compared to non-tele-SCI users. All other clinical utilization, baseline characteristics, psychosocial measures, and QoL did not differ among those who used tele-SCI and those who did not. The satisfaction survey suggested satisfaction with the tele-SCI intervention (89%), study equipment (89%), staff responsiveness (100%), and improved motivation for self-monitoring of health (71%). CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that tele-SCI is a feasible modality for providing general SCI care. Further research is required to examine longer-term efficacy of remotely-provided care among individuals living with SCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8958805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89588052022-03-29 SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care Khong, Cria-May M. Pasipanodya, Elizabeth C. Do, Jacqueline Phan, Nathan Solomon, Daniel L. Wong, Elyssa Y. Dirlikov, Benjamin Shem, Kazuko Spinal Cord Article STUDY DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical pilot study. OBJECTIVES: To assess usage, perceived impact, and satisfaction with a telemedicine program among individuals with spinal cord injury (tele-SCI). SETTING: Community-based. METHODS: Participants (N = 83) were recruited from acute SCI inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient SCI care at a community hospital to participate in a 6-month tele-SCI intervention administered by SCI subspecialty board-certified physiatrists via iPad FaceTime. In addition to monthly follow up interview calls, psychosocial and Quality of Life (QoL) measures were collected at baseline and post-intervention. A program satisfaction survey was also collected post-intervention. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of participants engaged in tele-SCI visits (Median [IQR]: 2.5 [2.0, 4.0]) for a total of 198 tele-SCI visits. Bladder and bowel concerns were the leading topics discussed during tele-SCI visits, followed by neurological, pain, and functional concerns. Tele-SCI users resided further away (Median miles [IQR] – 114[73–177] vs. 81[46–116], p = 0.023) and reported seeking more clinical advice (Median [IQR] – 1.5[0–4.0] vs. 0[0–1.0], p = 0.002) compared to non-tele-SCI users. All other clinical utilization, baseline characteristics, psychosocial measures, and QoL did not differ among those who used tele-SCI and those who did not. The satisfaction survey suggested satisfaction with the tele-SCI intervention (89%), study equipment (89%), staff responsiveness (100%), and improved motivation for self-monitoring of health (71%). CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that tele-SCI is a feasible modality for providing general SCI care. Further research is required to examine longer-term efficacy of remotely-provided care among individuals living with SCI. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8958805/ /pubmed/35347265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00790-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Khong, Cria-May M.
Pasipanodya, Elizabeth C.
Do, Jacqueline
Phan, Nathan
Solomon, Daniel L.
Wong, Elyssa Y.
Dirlikov, Benjamin
Shem, Kazuko
SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care
title SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care
title_full SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care
title_fullStr SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care
title_full_unstemmed SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care
title_short SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care
title_sort scipad: evaluating telemedicine via ipad facetime for general spinal cord injury care
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35347265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00790-1
work_keys_str_mv AT khongcriamaym scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare
AT pasipanodyaelizabethc scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare
AT dojacqueline scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare
AT phannathan scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare
AT solomondaniell scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare
AT wongelyssay scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare
AT dirlikovbenjamin scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare
AT shemkazuko scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare