Cargando…
SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care
STUDY DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical pilot study. OBJECTIVES: To assess usage, perceived impact, and satisfaction with a telemedicine program among individuals with spinal cord injury (tele-SCI). SETTING: Community-based. METHODS: Participants (N = 83) were recruited from acute SCI inpatient rehabili...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35347265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00790-1 |
_version_ | 1784677023473467392 |
---|---|
author | Khong, Cria-May M. Pasipanodya, Elizabeth C. Do, Jacqueline Phan, Nathan Solomon, Daniel L. Wong, Elyssa Y. Dirlikov, Benjamin Shem, Kazuko |
author_facet | Khong, Cria-May M. Pasipanodya, Elizabeth C. Do, Jacqueline Phan, Nathan Solomon, Daniel L. Wong, Elyssa Y. Dirlikov, Benjamin Shem, Kazuko |
author_sort | Khong, Cria-May M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical pilot study. OBJECTIVES: To assess usage, perceived impact, and satisfaction with a telemedicine program among individuals with spinal cord injury (tele-SCI). SETTING: Community-based. METHODS: Participants (N = 83) were recruited from acute SCI inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient SCI care at a community hospital to participate in a 6-month tele-SCI intervention administered by SCI subspecialty board-certified physiatrists via iPad FaceTime. In addition to monthly follow up interview calls, psychosocial and Quality of Life (QoL) measures were collected at baseline and post-intervention. A program satisfaction survey was also collected post-intervention. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of participants engaged in tele-SCI visits (Median [IQR]: 2.5 [2.0, 4.0]) for a total of 198 tele-SCI visits. Bladder and bowel concerns were the leading topics discussed during tele-SCI visits, followed by neurological, pain, and functional concerns. Tele-SCI users resided further away (Median miles [IQR] – 114[73–177] vs. 81[46–116], p = 0.023) and reported seeking more clinical advice (Median [IQR] – 1.5[0–4.0] vs. 0[0–1.0], p = 0.002) compared to non-tele-SCI users. All other clinical utilization, baseline characteristics, psychosocial measures, and QoL did not differ among those who used tele-SCI and those who did not. The satisfaction survey suggested satisfaction with the tele-SCI intervention (89%), study equipment (89%), staff responsiveness (100%), and improved motivation for self-monitoring of health (71%). CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that tele-SCI is a feasible modality for providing general SCI care. Further research is required to examine longer-term efficacy of remotely-provided care among individuals living with SCI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8958805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89588052022-03-29 SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care Khong, Cria-May M. Pasipanodya, Elizabeth C. Do, Jacqueline Phan, Nathan Solomon, Daniel L. Wong, Elyssa Y. Dirlikov, Benjamin Shem, Kazuko Spinal Cord Article STUDY DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical pilot study. OBJECTIVES: To assess usage, perceived impact, and satisfaction with a telemedicine program among individuals with spinal cord injury (tele-SCI). SETTING: Community-based. METHODS: Participants (N = 83) were recruited from acute SCI inpatient rehabilitation and outpatient SCI care at a community hospital to participate in a 6-month tele-SCI intervention administered by SCI subspecialty board-certified physiatrists via iPad FaceTime. In addition to monthly follow up interview calls, psychosocial and Quality of Life (QoL) measures were collected at baseline and post-intervention. A program satisfaction survey was also collected post-intervention. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of participants engaged in tele-SCI visits (Median [IQR]: 2.5 [2.0, 4.0]) for a total of 198 tele-SCI visits. Bladder and bowel concerns were the leading topics discussed during tele-SCI visits, followed by neurological, pain, and functional concerns. Tele-SCI users resided further away (Median miles [IQR] – 114[73–177] vs. 81[46–116], p = 0.023) and reported seeking more clinical advice (Median [IQR] – 1.5[0–4.0] vs. 0[0–1.0], p = 0.002) compared to non-tele-SCI users. All other clinical utilization, baseline characteristics, psychosocial measures, and QoL did not differ among those who used tele-SCI and those who did not. The satisfaction survey suggested satisfaction with the tele-SCI intervention (89%), study equipment (89%), staff responsiveness (100%), and improved motivation for self-monitoring of health (71%). CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that tele-SCI is a feasible modality for providing general SCI care. Further research is required to examine longer-term efficacy of remotely-provided care among individuals living with SCI. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-03-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8958805/ /pubmed/35347265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00790-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Khong, Cria-May M. Pasipanodya, Elizabeth C. Do, Jacqueline Phan, Nathan Solomon, Daniel L. Wong, Elyssa Y. Dirlikov, Benjamin Shem, Kazuko SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care |
title | SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care |
title_full | SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care |
title_fullStr | SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care |
title_full_unstemmed | SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care |
title_short | SCiPad: evaluating telemedicine via iPad facetime for general spinal cord injury care |
title_sort | scipad: evaluating telemedicine via ipad facetime for general spinal cord injury care |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35347265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00790-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khongcriamaym scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare AT pasipanodyaelizabethc scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare AT dojacqueline scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare AT phannathan scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare AT solomondaniell scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare AT wongelyssay scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare AT dirlikovbenjamin scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare AT shemkazuko scipadevaluatingtelemedicineviaipadfacetimeforgeneralspinalcordinjurycare |