Cargando…

What values should an agent align with?: An empirical comparison of general and context-specific values

The pursuit of values drives human behavior and promotes cooperation. Existing research is focused on general values (e.g., Schwartz) that transcend contexts. However, context-specific values are necessary to (1) understand human decisions, and (2) engineer intelligent agents that can elicit and ali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liscio, Enrico, van der Meer, Michiel, Siebert, Luciano C., Jonker, Catholijn M., Murukannaiah, Pradeep K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8958938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35369362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10458-022-09550-0
Descripción
Sumario:The pursuit of values drives human behavior and promotes cooperation. Existing research is focused on general values (e.g., Schwartz) that transcend contexts. However, context-specific values are necessary to (1) understand human decisions, and (2) engineer intelligent agents that can elicit and align with human values. We propose Axies, a hybrid (human and AI) methodology to identify context-specific values. Axies simplifies the abstract task of value identification as a guided value annotation process involving human annotators. Axies exploits the growing availability of value-laden text corpora and Natural Language Processing to assist the annotators in systematically identifying context-specific values. We evaluate Axies in a user study involving 80 human subjects. In our study, six annotators generate value lists for two timely and important contexts: Covid-19 measures and sustainable Energy. We employ two policy experts and 72 crowd workers to evaluate Axies value lists and compare them to a list of general (Schwartz) values. We find that Axies yields values that are (1) more context-specific than general values, (2) more suitable for value annotation than general values, and (3) independent of the people applying the methodology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10458-022-09550-0.