Cargando…

SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR assays: In vitro comparison of 4 WHO approved protocols on clinical specimens and its implications for real laboratory practice through variant emergence

INTRODUCTION: RT-PCR testing on nasopharyngeal swabs is a key component in the COVID-19 fighting, provided to use sensitive and specific SARS-CoV2 genome targets. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and to compare 4 widely used WHO approved RT-PCR protocols on real clinical specimens, to decrypt the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gdoura, Mariem, Abouda, Imen, Mrad, Mehdi, Ben Dhifallah, Imen, Belaiba, Zeineb, Fares, Wasfi, Chouikha, Anissa, Khedhiri, Maroua, Layouni, Kaouther, Touzi, Henda, Sadraoui, Amel, Hammemi, Walid, Meddeb, Zina, Hogga, Nahed, Ben Fadhel, Sihem, Haddad-Boubaker, Sondes, Triki, Henda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01784-4
_version_ 1784677113116229632
author Gdoura, Mariem
Abouda, Imen
Mrad, Mehdi
Ben Dhifallah, Imen
Belaiba, Zeineb
Fares, Wasfi
Chouikha, Anissa
Khedhiri, Maroua
Layouni, Kaouther
Touzi, Henda
Sadraoui, Amel
Hammemi, Walid
Meddeb, Zina
Hogga, Nahed
Ben Fadhel, Sihem
Haddad-Boubaker, Sondes
Triki, Henda
author_facet Gdoura, Mariem
Abouda, Imen
Mrad, Mehdi
Ben Dhifallah, Imen
Belaiba, Zeineb
Fares, Wasfi
Chouikha, Anissa
Khedhiri, Maroua
Layouni, Kaouther
Touzi, Henda
Sadraoui, Amel
Hammemi, Walid
Meddeb, Zina
Hogga, Nahed
Ben Fadhel, Sihem
Haddad-Boubaker, Sondes
Triki, Henda
author_sort Gdoura, Mariem
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: RT-PCR testing on nasopharyngeal swabs is a key component in the COVID-19 fighting, provided to use sensitive and specific SARS-CoV2 genome targets. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and to compare 4 widely used WHO approved RT-PCR protocols on real clinical specimens, to decrypt the reasons of the diverging results and to propose recommendations for the choice of the genome targets. METHODS: 260 nasopharyngeal samples were randomly selected among the samples tested between Week-16, 2020 and week-16 2021, in the Institut Pasteur de Tunis, Tunisia, one of the referent laboratories of COVID-19 in Tunisia. All samples were tested by Charité, Berlin protocol (singleplex envelop (E) and singleplex RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)), Hong Kong Universiy, China protocol (singleplex nucleoprotein (N) and singleplex Open reading frame Orf1b), commercial test DAAN Gene® (using the CDC China protocol), (triplex N, Orf1ab with internal control) and Institut Pasteur Paris protocol (IPP) (triplex IP2(nsp9) and IP4 (nsp12) with internal control). For IPP, a selection from samples positive by IP2 but negative with IP4 was re-tested by exactly the same protocol but this time in singleplex. New results were described and analyzed. RESULTS: In vitro analysis showed discordant results in 29.2% of cases (76 out of 260). The most discordant protocol is DAAN Gene® due to the false positive late signals with N target. Discordant results between the two protocol’s targets are more frequent when viral load are low (high Ct values). Our results demonstrated that the multiplexing has worsened the sensitivity of the IP4 target. CONCLUSION: We provide concise recommendations for the choice of the genome targets, the interpretation of the results and the alarm signals which makes suspect a gene mutation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8959265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89592652022-03-29 SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR assays: In vitro comparison of 4 WHO approved protocols on clinical specimens and its implications for real laboratory practice through variant emergence Gdoura, Mariem Abouda, Imen Mrad, Mehdi Ben Dhifallah, Imen Belaiba, Zeineb Fares, Wasfi Chouikha, Anissa Khedhiri, Maroua Layouni, Kaouther Touzi, Henda Sadraoui, Amel Hammemi, Walid Meddeb, Zina Hogga, Nahed Ben Fadhel, Sihem Haddad-Boubaker, Sondes Triki, Henda Virol J Research INTRODUCTION: RT-PCR testing on nasopharyngeal swabs is a key component in the COVID-19 fighting, provided to use sensitive and specific SARS-CoV2 genome targets. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and to compare 4 widely used WHO approved RT-PCR protocols on real clinical specimens, to decrypt the reasons of the diverging results and to propose recommendations for the choice of the genome targets. METHODS: 260 nasopharyngeal samples were randomly selected among the samples tested between Week-16, 2020 and week-16 2021, in the Institut Pasteur de Tunis, Tunisia, one of the referent laboratories of COVID-19 in Tunisia. All samples were tested by Charité, Berlin protocol (singleplex envelop (E) and singleplex RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp)), Hong Kong Universiy, China protocol (singleplex nucleoprotein (N) and singleplex Open reading frame Orf1b), commercial test DAAN Gene® (using the CDC China protocol), (triplex N, Orf1ab with internal control) and Institut Pasteur Paris protocol (IPP) (triplex IP2(nsp9) and IP4 (nsp12) with internal control). For IPP, a selection from samples positive by IP2 but negative with IP4 was re-tested by exactly the same protocol but this time in singleplex. New results were described and analyzed. RESULTS: In vitro analysis showed discordant results in 29.2% of cases (76 out of 260). The most discordant protocol is DAAN Gene® due to the false positive late signals with N target. Discordant results between the two protocol’s targets are more frequent when viral load are low (high Ct values). Our results demonstrated that the multiplexing has worsened the sensitivity of the IP4 target. CONCLUSION: We provide concise recommendations for the choice of the genome targets, the interpretation of the results and the alarm signals which makes suspect a gene mutation. BioMed Central 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8959265/ /pubmed/35346227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01784-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gdoura, Mariem
Abouda, Imen
Mrad, Mehdi
Ben Dhifallah, Imen
Belaiba, Zeineb
Fares, Wasfi
Chouikha, Anissa
Khedhiri, Maroua
Layouni, Kaouther
Touzi, Henda
Sadraoui, Amel
Hammemi, Walid
Meddeb, Zina
Hogga, Nahed
Ben Fadhel, Sihem
Haddad-Boubaker, Sondes
Triki, Henda
SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR assays: In vitro comparison of 4 WHO approved protocols on clinical specimens and its implications for real laboratory practice through variant emergence
title SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR assays: In vitro comparison of 4 WHO approved protocols on clinical specimens and its implications for real laboratory practice through variant emergence
title_full SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR assays: In vitro comparison of 4 WHO approved protocols on clinical specimens and its implications for real laboratory practice through variant emergence
title_fullStr SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR assays: In vitro comparison of 4 WHO approved protocols on clinical specimens and its implications for real laboratory practice through variant emergence
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR assays: In vitro comparison of 4 WHO approved protocols on clinical specimens and its implications for real laboratory practice through variant emergence
title_short SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR assays: In vitro comparison of 4 WHO approved protocols on clinical specimens and its implications for real laboratory practice through variant emergence
title_sort sars-cov2 rt-pcr assays: in vitro comparison of 4 who approved protocols on clinical specimens and its implications for real laboratory practice through variant emergence
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35346227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12985-022-01784-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gdouramariem sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT aboudaimen sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT mradmehdi sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT bendhifallahimen sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT belaibazeineb sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT fareswasfi sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT chouikhaanissa sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT khedhirimaroua sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT layounikaouther sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT touzihenda sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT sadraouiamel sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT hammemiwalid sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT meddebzina sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT hogganahed sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT benfadhelsihem sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT haddadboubakersondes sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence
AT trikihenda sarscov2rtpcrassaysinvitrocomparisonof4whoapprovedprotocolsonclinicalspecimensanditsimplicationsforreallaboratorypracticethroughvariantemergence