Cargando…
The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
BACKGROUND: To identify parameters based on dual-imaging (18)F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide ((18)F-OC) and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting the prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients (age: mean ± standard devi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6511179 |
_version_ | 1784677188309614592 |
---|---|
author | Hou, Jiale Long, Tingting Yang, Yi Chen, Dengming Hu, Shuo |
author_facet | Hou, Jiale Long, Tingting Yang, Yi Chen, Dengming Hu, Shuo |
author_sort | Hou, Jiale |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To identify parameters based on dual-imaging (18)F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide ((18)F-OC) and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting the prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients (age: mean ± standard deviation (SD): 51.8 ± 11.8 years) who underwent both (18)F-OC and (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging were enrolled in our retrospective study. The following PET parameters were measured: the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) and the volumetric parameters—(18)F-OC SSR-derived tumor volume (TV) and somatostatin receptor expression (SRE, TV multiplied by the mean standardized uptake value (SUV(mean))) and the (18)F-FDG-derived multiple tumor volume (MTV) and tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG). The NETPET grade based on dual-imaging PET images was assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was set as an endpoint. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed for PET parameters and clinical tumor data. RESULTS: In the univariate survival analyses of clinical information, PFS was significantly associated with age (>45.5 vs ≤45.5, years, P < 0.034) and the presence of bone metastases (P = 0.04). Higher values for the (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC volumetric parameters and the NETPET grade were adverse factors for PFS according to the dual-imaging PET parameters. In the multivariate survival analysis, the NETPET grade and SRE were predictors of PFS in NEN patients. CONCLUSION: The NETPET grade is a potential noninvasive prognostic biomarker for NENs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8959579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89595792022-03-31 The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Hou, Jiale Long, Tingting Yang, Yi Chen, Dengming Hu, Shuo Mol Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: To identify parameters based on dual-imaging (18)F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide ((18)F-OC) and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting the prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients (age: mean ± standard deviation (SD): 51.8 ± 11.8 years) who underwent both (18)F-OC and (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging were enrolled in our retrospective study. The following PET parameters were measured: the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) and the volumetric parameters—(18)F-OC SSR-derived tumor volume (TV) and somatostatin receptor expression (SRE, TV multiplied by the mean standardized uptake value (SUV(mean))) and the (18)F-FDG-derived multiple tumor volume (MTV) and tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG). The NETPET grade based on dual-imaging PET images was assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was set as an endpoint. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed for PET parameters and clinical tumor data. RESULTS: In the univariate survival analyses of clinical information, PFS was significantly associated with age (>45.5 vs ≤45.5, years, P < 0.034) and the presence of bone metastases (P = 0.04). Higher values for the (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC volumetric parameters and the NETPET grade were adverse factors for PFS according to the dual-imaging PET parameters. In the multivariate survival analysis, the NETPET grade and SRE were predictors of PFS in NEN patients. CONCLUSION: The NETPET grade is a potential noninvasive prognostic biomarker for NENs. Hindawi 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8959579/ /pubmed/35368455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6511179 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jiale Hou et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hou, Jiale Long, Tingting Yang, Yi Chen, Dengming Hu, Shuo The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms |
title | The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms |
title_full | The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms |
title_fullStr | The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms |
title_full_unstemmed | The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms |
title_short | The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms |
title_sort | potential prognostic value of dual-imaging pet parameters based on (18)f-fdg and (18)f-oc for neuroendocrine neoplasms |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6511179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houjiale thepotentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms AT longtingting thepotentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms AT yangyi thepotentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms AT chendengming thepotentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms AT hushuo thepotentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms AT houjiale potentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms AT longtingting potentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms AT yangyi potentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms AT chendengming potentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms AT hushuo potentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms |