Cargando…

The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

BACKGROUND: To identify parameters based on dual-imaging (18)F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide ((18)F-OC) and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting the prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients (age: mean ± standard devi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, Jiale, Long, Tingting, Yang, Yi, Chen, Dengming, Hu, Shuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6511179
_version_ 1784677188309614592
author Hou, Jiale
Long, Tingting
Yang, Yi
Chen, Dengming
Hu, Shuo
author_facet Hou, Jiale
Long, Tingting
Yang, Yi
Chen, Dengming
Hu, Shuo
author_sort Hou, Jiale
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To identify parameters based on dual-imaging (18)F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide ((18)F-OC) and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting the prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients (age: mean ± standard deviation (SD): 51.8 ± 11.8 years) who underwent both (18)F-OC and (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging were enrolled in our retrospective study. The following PET parameters were measured: the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) and the volumetric parameters—(18)F-OC SSR-derived tumor volume (TV) and somatostatin receptor expression (SRE, TV multiplied by the mean standardized uptake value (SUV(mean))) and the (18)F-FDG-derived multiple tumor volume (MTV) and tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG). The NETPET grade based on dual-imaging PET images was assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was set as an endpoint. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed for PET parameters and clinical tumor data. RESULTS: In the univariate survival analyses of clinical information, PFS was significantly associated with age (>45.5 vs ≤45.5, years, P < 0.034) and the presence of bone metastases (P = 0.04). Higher values for the (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC volumetric parameters and the NETPET grade were adverse factors for PFS according to the dual-imaging PET parameters. In the multivariate survival analysis, the NETPET grade and SRE were predictors of PFS in NEN patients. CONCLUSION: The NETPET grade is a potential noninvasive prognostic biomarker for NENs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8959579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89595792022-03-31 The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Hou, Jiale Long, Tingting Yang, Yi Chen, Dengming Hu, Shuo Mol Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: To identify parameters based on dual-imaging (18)F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide ((18)F-OC) and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for predicting the prognosis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients (age: mean ± standard deviation (SD): 51.8 ± 11.8 years) who underwent both (18)F-OC and (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging were enrolled in our retrospective study. The following PET parameters were measured: the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) and the volumetric parameters—(18)F-OC SSR-derived tumor volume (TV) and somatostatin receptor expression (SRE, TV multiplied by the mean standardized uptake value (SUV(mean))) and the (18)F-FDG-derived multiple tumor volume (MTV) and tumor lesion glycolysis (TLG). The NETPET grade based on dual-imaging PET images was assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was set as an endpoint. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed for PET parameters and clinical tumor data. RESULTS: In the univariate survival analyses of clinical information, PFS was significantly associated with age (>45.5 vs ≤45.5, years, P < 0.034) and the presence of bone metastases (P = 0.04). Higher values for the (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC volumetric parameters and the NETPET grade were adverse factors for PFS according to the dual-imaging PET parameters. In the multivariate survival analysis, the NETPET grade and SRE were predictors of PFS in NEN patients. CONCLUSION: The NETPET grade is a potential noninvasive prognostic biomarker for NENs. Hindawi 2022-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8959579/ /pubmed/35368455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6511179 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jiale Hou et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hou, Jiale
Long, Tingting
Yang, Yi
Chen, Dengming
Hu, Shuo
The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title_full The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title_fullStr The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title_short The Potential Prognostic Value of Dual-Imaging PET Parameters Based on (18)F-FDG and (18)F-OC for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
title_sort potential prognostic value of dual-imaging pet parameters based on (18)f-fdg and (18)f-oc for neuroendocrine neoplasms
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35368455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6511179
work_keys_str_mv AT houjiale thepotentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT longtingting thepotentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT yangyi thepotentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT chendengming thepotentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT hushuo thepotentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT houjiale potentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT longtingting potentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT yangyi potentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT chendengming potentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms
AT hushuo potentialprognosticvalueofdualimagingpetparametersbasedon18ffdgand18focforneuroendocrineneoplasms