Cargando…

Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study

BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine has been associated with improved heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) compared to phenylephrine as a treatment for post-spinal hypotension during caesarean delivery (CD) in singleton pregnancies. Our current study compared the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Weijia, Song, Yujie, Li, Jiang, Zhou, Xianjin, Xu, Zhendong, Liu, Zhiqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355656
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S357507
_version_ 1784677258155261952
author Du, Weijia
Song, Yujie
Li, Jiang
Zhou, Xianjin
Xu, Zhendong
Liu, Zhiqiang
author_facet Du, Weijia
Song, Yujie
Li, Jiang
Zhou, Xianjin
Xu, Zhendong
Liu, Zhiqiang
author_sort Du, Weijia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine has been associated with improved heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) compared to phenylephrine as a treatment for post-spinal hypotension during caesarean delivery (CD) in singleton pregnancies. Our current study compared the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine in maintaining maternal hemodynamics after spinal anaesthesia in twin pregnancies during elective CD. METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled study. From December 2017 to December 2018, 62 women with healthy twin term pregnancies undergoing elective CD under spinal anaesthesia were studied. Following spinal induction, either norepinephrine (6 μg/mL) or phenylepinephrine (75 μg/mL) was infused at 60 mL/h to maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) near baseline until delivery. HR, SBP, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and CO were collected using anaesthesia monitors and continuous-pulse waveform analysis. The primary outcome was maternal CO. Other parameters of maternal hemodynamics, umbilical cord blood gases, and adverse events were also compared. RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables (CO, SBP, HR, and SVR) between spinal anaesthesia induction to skin incision were similar between the two groups (P = 0.889, 0.057, 0.977, and 0.416, respectively). The incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the phenylephrine group (69%) than in the norepinephrine group (24.2%, P<0.001). Maternal nausea and vomiting, hypotension, reactive hypertension, and neonatal outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: When administered as a prophylactic fixed-rate infusion, phenylephrine and norepinephrine are both capable of maintaining maternal blood pressure following spinal anaesthesia in twin pregnancies. There were no differences in the maternal hemodynamics or foetal outcomes between women receiving norepinephrine and phenylephrine. PREVIOUS PRESENTATIONS: Presented at the 51st Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Annual Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona, May 1–5, 2019. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY: No. ChiCTR-IOR-17013358.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8959871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89598712022-03-29 Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study Du, Weijia Song, Yujie Li, Jiang Zhou, Xianjin Xu, Zhendong Liu, Zhiqiang Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine has been associated with improved heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) compared to phenylephrine as a treatment for post-spinal hypotension during caesarean delivery (CD) in singleton pregnancies. Our current study compared the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine in maintaining maternal hemodynamics after spinal anaesthesia in twin pregnancies during elective CD. METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled study. From December 2017 to December 2018, 62 women with healthy twin term pregnancies undergoing elective CD under spinal anaesthesia were studied. Following spinal induction, either norepinephrine (6 μg/mL) or phenylepinephrine (75 μg/mL) was infused at 60 mL/h to maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) near baseline until delivery. HR, SBP, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and CO were collected using anaesthesia monitors and continuous-pulse waveform analysis. The primary outcome was maternal CO. Other parameters of maternal hemodynamics, umbilical cord blood gases, and adverse events were also compared. RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables (CO, SBP, HR, and SVR) between spinal anaesthesia induction to skin incision were similar between the two groups (P = 0.889, 0.057, 0.977, and 0.416, respectively). The incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the phenylephrine group (69%) than in the norepinephrine group (24.2%, P<0.001). Maternal nausea and vomiting, hypotension, reactive hypertension, and neonatal outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: When administered as a prophylactic fixed-rate infusion, phenylephrine and norepinephrine are both capable of maintaining maternal blood pressure following spinal anaesthesia in twin pregnancies. There were no differences in the maternal hemodynamics or foetal outcomes between women receiving norepinephrine and phenylephrine. PREVIOUS PRESENTATIONS: Presented at the 51st Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Annual Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona, May 1–5, 2019. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY: No. ChiCTR-IOR-17013358. Dove 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8959871/ /pubmed/35355656 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S357507 Text en © 2022 Du et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Du, Weijia
Song, Yujie
Li, Jiang
Zhou, Xianjin
Xu, Zhendong
Liu, Zhiqiang
Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study
title Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study
title_full Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study
title_short Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study
title_sort comparison of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine infusions during spinal anaesthesia for primary caesarean delivery in twin pregnancies: a randomized double-blinded clinical study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355656
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S357507
work_keys_str_mv AT duweijia comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy
AT songyujie comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy
AT lijiang comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy
AT zhouxianjin comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy
AT xuzhendong comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy
AT liuzhiqiang comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy