Cargando…
Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study
BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine has been associated with improved heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) compared to phenylephrine as a treatment for post-spinal hypotension during caesarean delivery (CD) in singleton pregnancies. Our current study compared the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355656 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S357507 |
_version_ | 1784677258155261952 |
---|---|
author | Du, Weijia Song, Yujie Li, Jiang Zhou, Xianjin Xu, Zhendong Liu, Zhiqiang |
author_facet | Du, Weijia Song, Yujie Li, Jiang Zhou, Xianjin Xu, Zhendong Liu, Zhiqiang |
author_sort | Du, Weijia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine has been associated with improved heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) compared to phenylephrine as a treatment for post-spinal hypotension during caesarean delivery (CD) in singleton pregnancies. Our current study compared the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine in maintaining maternal hemodynamics after spinal anaesthesia in twin pregnancies during elective CD. METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled study. From December 2017 to December 2018, 62 women with healthy twin term pregnancies undergoing elective CD under spinal anaesthesia were studied. Following spinal induction, either norepinephrine (6 μg/mL) or phenylepinephrine (75 μg/mL) was infused at 60 mL/h to maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) near baseline until delivery. HR, SBP, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and CO were collected using anaesthesia monitors and continuous-pulse waveform analysis. The primary outcome was maternal CO. Other parameters of maternal hemodynamics, umbilical cord blood gases, and adverse events were also compared. RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables (CO, SBP, HR, and SVR) between spinal anaesthesia induction to skin incision were similar between the two groups (P = 0.889, 0.057, 0.977, and 0.416, respectively). The incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the phenylephrine group (69%) than in the norepinephrine group (24.2%, P<0.001). Maternal nausea and vomiting, hypotension, reactive hypertension, and neonatal outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: When administered as a prophylactic fixed-rate infusion, phenylephrine and norepinephrine are both capable of maintaining maternal blood pressure following spinal anaesthesia in twin pregnancies. There were no differences in the maternal hemodynamics or foetal outcomes between women receiving norepinephrine and phenylephrine. PREVIOUS PRESENTATIONS: Presented at the 51st Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Annual Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona, May 1–5, 2019. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY: No. ChiCTR-IOR-17013358. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8959871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89598712022-03-29 Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study Du, Weijia Song, Yujie Li, Jiang Zhou, Xianjin Xu, Zhendong Liu, Zhiqiang Drug Des Devel Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Norepinephrine has been associated with improved heart rate (HR) and cardiac output (CO) compared to phenylephrine as a treatment for post-spinal hypotension during caesarean delivery (CD) in singleton pregnancies. Our current study compared the effects of norepinephrine and phenylephrine in maintaining maternal hemodynamics after spinal anaesthesia in twin pregnancies during elective CD. METHODS: This was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled study. From December 2017 to December 2018, 62 women with healthy twin term pregnancies undergoing elective CD under spinal anaesthesia were studied. Following spinal induction, either norepinephrine (6 μg/mL) or phenylepinephrine (75 μg/mL) was infused at 60 mL/h to maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) near baseline until delivery. HR, SBP, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and CO were collected using anaesthesia monitors and continuous-pulse waveform analysis. The primary outcome was maternal CO. Other parameters of maternal hemodynamics, umbilical cord blood gases, and adverse events were also compared. RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables (CO, SBP, HR, and SVR) between spinal anaesthesia induction to skin incision were similar between the two groups (P = 0.889, 0.057, 0.977, and 0.416, respectively). The incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the phenylephrine group (69%) than in the norepinephrine group (24.2%, P<0.001). Maternal nausea and vomiting, hypotension, reactive hypertension, and neonatal outcomes did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: When administered as a prophylactic fixed-rate infusion, phenylephrine and norepinephrine are both capable of maintaining maternal blood pressure following spinal anaesthesia in twin pregnancies. There were no differences in the maternal hemodynamics or foetal outcomes between women receiving norepinephrine and phenylephrine. PREVIOUS PRESENTATIONS: Presented at the 51st Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Annual Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona, May 1–5, 2019. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY: No. ChiCTR-IOR-17013358. Dove 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8959871/ /pubmed/35355656 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S357507 Text en © 2022 Du et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Du, Weijia Song, Yujie Li, Jiang Zhou, Xianjin Xu, Zhendong Liu, Zhiqiang Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study |
title | Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study |
title_full | Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study |
title_short | Comparison of Prophylactic Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine Infusions During Spinal Anaesthesia for Primary Caesarean Delivery in Twin Pregnancies: A Randomized Double-Blinded Clinical Study |
title_sort | comparison of prophylactic norepinephrine and phenylephrine infusions during spinal anaesthesia for primary caesarean delivery in twin pregnancies: a randomized double-blinded clinical study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8959871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355656 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S357507 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duweijia comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy AT songyujie comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy AT lijiang comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy AT zhouxianjin comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy AT xuzhendong comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy AT liuzhiqiang comparisonofprophylacticnorepinephrineandphenylephrineinfusionsduringspinalanaesthesiaforprimarycaesareandeliveryintwinpregnanciesarandomizeddoubleblindedclinicalstudy |