Cargando…

Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic thyroidectomy bilateral areola approach (ETBAA) improved cosmetic outcomes significantly and is now widely applied. The usage of drainage tubes is controversial in conventional open thyroidectomy (COT), but studies about drainage placement decisions during ETBAA are still...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yukai, Wang, Chengchen, Bai, Binglong, Ye, Mao, Ma, Junjie, Zhang, Jingying, Li, Zhiyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356502
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.860130
_version_ 1784677296795287552
author Chen, Yukai
Wang, Chengchen
Bai, Binglong
Ye, Mao
Ma, Junjie
Zhang, Jingying
Li, Zhiyu
author_facet Chen, Yukai
Wang, Chengchen
Bai, Binglong
Ye, Mao
Ma, Junjie
Zhang, Jingying
Li, Zhiyu
author_sort Chen, Yukai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The endoscopic thyroidectomy bilateral areola approach (ETBAA) improved cosmetic outcomes significantly and is now widely applied. The usage of drainage tubes is controversial in conventional open thyroidectomy (COT), but studies about drainage placement decisions during ETBAA are still limited. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of having no drainage tube applied during ETBAA on patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. METHODS: The clinical data of patients undergoing ETBAA from July 2018 to May 2021 was retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups based on drain placement: no-drain and drain. The two groups were matched at a ratio of 1:1. Fifty-five patients from each group were finally included. Postoperative complications and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative complications, including hemorrhage, surgical site infection, and subcutaneous seroma. Compared with the drain group, the operation time of the no-drain group was significantly shorter [(107.75 ± 24.59) min vs. (119.91 ± 34.05) min, P < 0.05]. The total and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the no-drain group [(2.40 ± 0.71) days vs. (4.78 ± 1.33) days, P < 0.001, (2.04 ± 0.19) days vs. (2.15 ± 0.36) days, P < 0.05], and the costs of surgical consumables were also significantly lower [(6,820.83 ± 164.29) CNY vs. (7,494.13 ± 216.7) CNY, P < 0.05]. The postoperative pain score of the no-drain group was significantly lower than the drain group [(1.58 ± 0.63) vs. (1.89 ± 0.76), P < 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: No drainage applied during ETBAA on papillary thyroid carcinoma is safe and feasible. This practice does not increase the risk of postoperative complications, but it does shorten the operation time and hospital stay, as well as reduce medical costs. Furthermore, it alleviates the suffering of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8960029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89600292022-03-29 Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report Chen, Yukai Wang, Chengchen Bai, Binglong Ye, Mao Ma, Junjie Zhang, Jingying Li, Zhiyu Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: The endoscopic thyroidectomy bilateral areola approach (ETBAA) improved cosmetic outcomes significantly and is now widely applied. The usage of drainage tubes is controversial in conventional open thyroidectomy (COT), but studies about drainage placement decisions during ETBAA are still limited. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of having no drainage tube applied during ETBAA on patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. METHODS: The clinical data of patients undergoing ETBAA from July 2018 to May 2021 was retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups based on drain placement: no-drain and drain. The two groups were matched at a ratio of 1:1. Fifty-five patients from each group were finally included. Postoperative complications and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative complications, including hemorrhage, surgical site infection, and subcutaneous seroma. Compared with the drain group, the operation time of the no-drain group was significantly shorter [(107.75 ± 24.59) min vs. (119.91 ± 34.05) min, P < 0.05]. The total and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the no-drain group [(2.40 ± 0.71) days vs. (4.78 ± 1.33) days, P < 0.001, (2.04 ± 0.19) days vs. (2.15 ± 0.36) days, P < 0.05], and the costs of surgical consumables were also significantly lower [(6,820.83 ± 164.29) CNY vs. (7,494.13 ± 216.7) CNY, P < 0.05]. The postoperative pain score of the no-drain group was significantly lower than the drain group [(1.58 ± 0.63) vs. (1.89 ± 0.76), P < 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: No drainage applied during ETBAA on papillary thyroid carcinoma is safe and feasible. This practice does not increase the risk of postoperative complications, but it does shorten the operation time and hospital stay, as well as reduce medical costs. Furthermore, it alleviates the suffering of patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8960029/ /pubmed/35356502 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.860130 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, Wang, Bai, Ye, Ma, Zhang and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Chen, Yukai
Wang, Chengchen
Bai, Binglong
Ye, Mao
Ma, Junjie
Zhang, Jingying
Li, Zhiyu
Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report
title Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report
title_full Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report
title_fullStr Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report
title_full_unstemmed Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report
title_short Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report
title_sort drainage tube placement may not be necessary during endoscopic thyroidectomy bilateral areola approach: a preliminary report
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35356502
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.860130
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyukai drainagetubeplacementmaynotbenecessaryduringendoscopicthyroidectomybilateralareolaapproachapreliminaryreport
AT wangchengchen drainagetubeplacementmaynotbenecessaryduringendoscopicthyroidectomybilateralareolaapproachapreliminaryreport
AT baibinglong drainagetubeplacementmaynotbenecessaryduringendoscopicthyroidectomybilateralareolaapproachapreliminaryreport
AT yemao drainagetubeplacementmaynotbenecessaryduringendoscopicthyroidectomybilateralareolaapproachapreliminaryreport
AT majunjie drainagetubeplacementmaynotbenecessaryduringendoscopicthyroidectomybilateralareolaapproachapreliminaryreport
AT zhangjingying drainagetubeplacementmaynotbenecessaryduringendoscopicthyroidectomybilateralareolaapproachapreliminaryreport
AT lizhiyu drainagetubeplacementmaynotbenecessaryduringendoscopicthyroidectomybilateralareolaapproachapreliminaryreport