Cargando…
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory
State rumination, unlike trait rumination which is described as a persistent and stable response style, is usually triggered by a specific stressful event and causes negative emotions within a short period of time. The measurement methods of trait rumination, such as the ruminative response scale (R...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35359769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.824744 |
_version_ | 1784677322518953984 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Chanyu Song, Xiaoqi Lee, Tatia M. C. Zhang, Ruibin |
author_facet | Wang, Chanyu Song, Xiaoqi Lee, Tatia M. C. Zhang, Ruibin |
author_sort | Wang, Chanyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | State rumination, unlike trait rumination which is described as a persistent and stable response style, is usually triggered by a specific stressful event and causes negative emotions within a short period of time. The measurement methods of trait rumination, such as the ruminative response scale (RRS), are therefore not fully applicable to state rumination. Recently, researchers have developed the brief state rumination inventory (BSRI) to characterize state rumination, addressing the gap in the field of accurate measurement of state rumination. To develop such an effective tool in the Chinese context, we developed a Chinese version of the BSRI and tested its psychometric properties. Two studies were conducted to address the research goal. In Study 1, we recruited 512 subjects, each of whom completed the Chinese version of the BSRI, RRS, emotional regulation questionnaire (ERQ), depression–anxiety–stress scale (DASS), and positive and negative affect scale (PANAS). Results showed that the scores of the BSRI were positively correlated with all other scale scores (ps < 0.001), and the correlation with the RRS was the highest, indicating that the BSRI showed good convergent validity. Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the Chinese version of the BSRI was 0.93. Study 2 aimed to examine the ecological validity of the Chinese version of the BSRI. We recruited another 54 subjects who were randomly divided into two groups, with 27 in the rumination induction group and 27 in the distraction group, and recorded the BSRI scores of the two groups before and after a specific experiment. We found there was a significant increase in BSRI scores after rumination induction (t = 3.91, p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in the concrete distraction group before and after the experiment (t = 0.70, p = 0.48). In sum, the Chinese version of the BSRI showed good reliability and validity for assessing state rumination in the general Chinese population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8960134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89601342022-03-30 Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory Wang, Chanyu Song, Xiaoqi Lee, Tatia M. C. Zhang, Ruibin Front Public Health Public Health State rumination, unlike trait rumination which is described as a persistent and stable response style, is usually triggered by a specific stressful event and causes negative emotions within a short period of time. The measurement methods of trait rumination, such as the ruminative response scale (RRS), are therefore not fully applicable to state rumination. Recently, researchers have developed the brief state rumination inventory (BSRI) to characterize state rumination, addressing the gap in the field of accurate measurement of state rumination. To develop such an effective tool in the Chinese context, we developed a Chinese version of the BSRI and tested its psychometric properties. Two studies were conducted to address the research goal. In Study 1, we recruited 512 subjects, each of whom completed the Chinese version of the BSRI, RRS, emotional regulation questionnaire (ERQ), depression–anxiety–stress scale (DASS), and positive and negative affect scale (PANAS). Results showed that the scores of the BSRI were positively correlated with all other scale scores (ps < 0.001), and the correlation with the RRS was the highest, indicating that the BSRI showed good convergent validity. Additionally, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the Chinese version of the BSRI was 0.93. Study 2 aimed to examine the ecological validity of the Chinese version of the BSRI. We recruited another 54 subjects who were randomly divided into two groups, with 27 in the rumination induction group and 27 in the distraction group, and recorded the BSRI scores of the two groups before and after a specific experiment. We found there was a significant increase in BSRI scores after rumination induction (t = 3.91, p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference in the concrete distraction group before and after the experiment (t = 0.70, p = 0.48). In sum, the Chinese version of the BSRI showed good reliability and validity for assessing state rumination in the general Chinese population. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8960134/ /pubmed/35359769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.824744 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Song, Lee and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Wang, Chanyu Song, Xiaoqi Lee, Tatia M. C. Zhang, Ruibin Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory |
title | Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory |
title_full | Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory |
title_fullStr | Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory |
title_short | Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Brief State Rumination Inventory |
title_sort | psychometric properties of the chinese version of the brief state rumination inventory |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35359769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.824744 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangchanyu psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionofthebriefstateruminationinventory AT songxiaoqi psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionofthebriefstateruminationinventory AT leetatiamc psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionofthebriefstateruminationinventory AT zhangruibin psychometricpropertiesofthechineseversionofthebriefstateruminationinventory |