Cargando…
Is There Evidence for the Specificity of Closed-Loop Brain Training in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A Systematic Review
INTRODUCTION: Internalizing disorders (IDs), e.g., major depressive disorder (MDD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are the most prevalent psychopathologies experienced worldwide. Current first-line therapies (i.e., pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy) offe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35360168 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.821136 |
_version_ | 1784677336931631104 |
---|---|
author | Perez, Tyson Michael Mathew, Jerin Glue, Paul Adhia, Divya B. De Ridder, Dirk |
author_facet | Perez, Tyson Michael Mathew, Jerin Glue, Paul Adhia, Divya B. De Ridder, Dirk |
author_sort | Perez, Tyson Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Internalizing disorders (IDs), e.g., major depressive disorder (MDD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are the most prevalent psychopathologies experienced worldwide. Current first-line therapies (i.e., pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy) offer high failure rates, limited accessibility, and substantial side-effects. Electroencephalography (EEG) guided closed-loop brain training, also known as EEG-neurofeedback (EEG-NFB), is believed to be a safe and effective alternative, however, there is much debate in the field regarding the existence of specificity [i.e., clinical effects specific to the modulation of the targeted EEG variable(s)]. This review was undertaken to determine if there is evidence for EEG-NFB specificity in the treatment of IDs. METHODS: We considered only randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trials. Outcomes of interest included self/parent/teacher reports and clinician ratings of ID-related symptomatology. RESULTS: Of the four reports (total participant number = 152) meeting our eligibility criteria, three had point estimates suggesting small to moderate effect sizes favoring genuine therapy over sham, however, due to small sample sizes, all 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were wide and spanned the null. The fourth trial had yet to post results as of the submission date of this review. The limited overall number of eligible reports (and participants), large degree of inter-trial heterogeneity, and restricted span of ID populations with published/posted outcome data (i.e., PTSD and OCD) precluded a quantitative synthesis. DISCUSSION: The current literature suggests that EEG-NFB may induce specific effects in the treatment of some forms of IDs, however, the evidence is very limited. Ultimately, more randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trials encompassing a wider array of ID populations are needed to determine the existence and, if present, degree of EEG-NFB specificity in the treatment of IDs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42020159702]. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8960197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89601972022-03-30 Is There Evidence for the Specificity of Closed-Loop Brain Training in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A Systematic Review Perez, Tyson Michael Mathew, Jerin Glue, Paul Adhia, Divya B. De Ridder, Dirk Front Neurosci Neuroscience INTRODUCTION: Internalizing disorders (IDs), e.g., major depressive disorder (MDD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are the most prevalent psychopathologies experienced worldwide. Current first-line therapies (i.e., pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy) offer high failure rates, limited accessibility, and substantial side-effects. Electroencephalography (EEG) guided closed-loop brain training, also known as EEG-neurofeedback (EEG-NFB), is believed to be a safe and effective alternative, however, there is much debate in the field regarding the existence of specificity [i.e., clinical effects specific to the modulation of the targeted EEG variable(s)]. This review was undertaken to determine if there is evidence for EEG-NFB specificity in the treatment of IDs. METHODS: We considered only randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trials. Outcomes of interest included self/parent/teacher reports and clinician ratings of ID-related symptomatology. RESULTS: Of the four reports (total participant number = 152) meeting our eligibility criteria, three had point estimates suggesting small to moderate effect sizes favoring genuine therapy over sham, however, due to small sample sizes, all 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were wide and spanned the null. The fourth trial had yet to post results as of the submission date of this review. The limited overall number of eligible reports (and participants), large degree of inter-trial heterogeneity, and restricted span of ID populations with published/posted outcome data (i.e., PTSD and OCD) precluded a quantitative synthesis. DISCUSSION: The current literature suggests that EEG-NFB may induce specific effects in the treatment of some forms of IDs, however, the evidence is very limited. Ultimately, more randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trials encompassing a wider array of ID populations are needed to determine the existence and, if present, degree of EEG-NFB specificity in the treatment of IDs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42020159702]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8960197/ /pubmed/35360168 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.821136 Text en Copyright © 2022 Perez, Mathew, Glue, Adhia and De Ridder. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Perez, Tyson Michael Mathew, Jerin Glue, Paul Adhia, Divya B. De Ridder, Dirk Is There Evidence for the Specificity of Closed-Loop Brain Training in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A Systematic Review |
title | Is There Evidence for the Specificity of Closed-Loop Brain Training in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A Systematic Review |
title_full | Is There Evidence for the Specificity of Closed-Loop Brain Training in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Is There Evidence for the Specificity of Closed-Loop Brain Training in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Is There Evidence for the Specificity of Closed-Loop Brain Training in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A Systematic Review |
title_short | Is There Evidence for the Specificity of Closed-Loop Brain Training in the Treatment of Internalizing Disorders? A Systematic Review |
title_sort | is there evidence for the specificity of closed-loop brain training in the treatment of internalizing disorders? a systematic review |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35360168 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.821136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereztysonmichael isthereevidenceforthespecificityofclosedloopbraintraininginthetreatmentofinternalizingdisordersasystematicreview AT mathewjerin isthereevidenceforthespecificityofclosedloopbraintraininginthetreatmentofinternalizingdisordersasystematicreview AT gluepaul isthereevidenceforthespecificityofclosedloopbraintraininginthetreatmentofinternalizingdisordersasystematicreview AT adhiadivyab isthereevidenceforthespecificityofclosedloopbraintraininginthetreatmentofinternalizingdisordersasystematicreview AT deridderdirk isthereevidenceforthespecificityofclosedloopbraintraininginthetreatmentofinternalizingdisordersasystematicreview |