Cargando…

Do Different Hurdle Heights Alter Important Spatiotemporal Variables in Hurdle Clearance?

The aim of this study was to determine whether important spatiotemporal variables in hurdle clearance change with different hurdle heights. Twelve male hurdlers (mean height, 1.75 ± 0.04 m) cleared hurdles set at different heights [10% higher (High) and 10% lower (Low) than the center of mass (CM)];...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozaki, Yusuke, Ueda, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35359500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.822592
_version_ 1784677361117036544
author Ozaki, Yusuke
Ueda, Takeshi
author_facet Ozaki, Yusuke
Ueda, Takeshi
author_sort Ozaki, Yusuke
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to determine whether important spatiotemporal variables in hurdle clearance change with different hurdle heights. Twelve male hurdlers (mean height, 1.75 ± 0.04 m) cleared hurdles set at different heights [10% higher (High) and 10% lower (Low) than the center of mass (CM)]; images were captured by six high-speed cameras, and each spatiotemporal variable was calculated. Thereafter, the difference in each spatiotemporal variable between High and Low and the relationship between the mean horizontal velocity from takeoff to landing [Hurdle clearance velocity (HC-v)] and each spatiotemporal variable were examined. Our findings indicated that values for flight time, flight time from hurdle to landing (2nd flight time), clearance time, release height on takeoff, peak height of the CM, and the difference in landing distance were greater in the High condition than in the Low condition. Moreover, a low rate of deceleration on takeoff and short 2nd flight time, clearance distance, and takeoff distance were more strongly related to HC-v in the condition High, whereas a low rate of deceleration on landing, short flight time from takeoff to hurdle (1st flight time), high release height on landing, and touchdown height on landing were more strongly related to HC-v in the Low condition. Therefore, coaches should consider these changes in spatiotemporal variables when changing hurdle heights based on age group or event. It should also be noted that, even when the hurdle heights are the same, the spatiotemporal variables that should be considered may differ depending on the height of the hurdler.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8960296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89602962022-03-30 Do Different Hurdle Heights Alter Important Spatiotemporal Variables in Hurdle Clearance? Ozaki, Yusuke Ueda, Takeshi Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living The aim of this study was to determine whether important spatiotemporal variables in hurdle clearance change with different hurdle heights. Twelve male hurdlers (mean height, 1.75 ± 0.04 m) cleared hurdles set at different heights [10% higher (High) and 10% lower (Low) than the center of mass (CM)]; images were captured by six high-speed cameras, and each spatiotemporal variable was calculated. Thereafter, the difference in each spatiotemporal variable between High and Low and the relationship between the mean horizontal velocity from takeoff to landing [Hurdle clearance velocity (HC-v)] and each spatiotemporal variable were examined. Our findings indicated that values for flight time, flight time from hurdle to landing (2nd flight time), clearance time, release height on takeoff, peak height of the CM, and the difference in landing distance were greater in the High condition than in the Low condition. Moreover, a low rate of deceleration on takeoff and short 2nd flight time, clearance distance, and takeoff distance were more strongly related to HC-v in the condition High, whereas a low rate of deceleration on landing, short flight time from takeoff to hurdle (1st flight time), high release height on landing, and touchdown height on landing were more strongly related to HC-v in the Low condition. Therefore, coaches should consider these changes in spatiotemporal variables when changing hurdle heights based on age group or event. It should also be noted that, even when the hurdle heights are the same, the spatiotemporal variables that should be considered may differ depending on the height of the hurdler. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8960296/ /pubmed/35359500 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.822592 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ozaki and Ueda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Ozaki, Yusuke
Ueda, Takeshi
Do Different Hurdle Heights Alter Important Spatiotemporal Variables in Hurdle Clearance?
title Do Different Hurdle Heights Alter Important Spatiotemporal Variables in Hurdle Clearance?
title_full Do Different Hurdle Heights Alter Important Spatiotemporal Variables in Hurdle Clearance?
title_fullStr Do Different Hurdle Heights Alter Important Spatiotemporal Variables in Hurdle Clearance?
title_full_unstemmed Do Different Hurdle Heights Alter Important Spatiotemporal Variables in Hurdle Clearance?
title_short Do Different Hurdle Heights Alter Important Spatiotemporal Variables in Hurdle Clearance?
title_sort do different hurdle heights alter important spatiotemporal variables in hurdle clearance?
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35359500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.822592
work_keys_str_mv AT ozakiyusuke dodifferenthurdleheightsalterimportantspatiotemporalvariablesinhurdleclearance
AT uedatakeshi dodifferenthurdleheightsalterimportantspatiotemporalvariablesinhurdleclearance