Cargando…

MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey

OBJECTIVES: While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for the imaging of female pelvis, there is an ongoing debate about the most appropriate indications and optimal imaging protocols. The European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) launched a survey to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nougaret, Stephanie, Lakhman, Yulia, Gourgou, Sophie, Kubik-Huch, Rahel, Derchi, Lorenzo, Sala, Evis, Forstner, Rosemarie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35347481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01152-w
_version_ 1784677396607139840
author Nougaret, Stephanie
Lakhman, Yulia
Gourgou, Sophie
Kubik-Huch, Rahel
Derchi, Lorenzo
Sala, Evis
Forstner, Rosemarie
author_facet Nougaret, Stephanie
Lakhman, Yulia
Gourgou, Sophie
Kubik-Huch, Rahel
Derchi, Lorenzo
Sala, Evis
Forstner, Rosemarie
author_sort Nougaret, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for the imaging of female pelvis, there is an ongoing debate about the most appropriate indications and optimal imaging protocols. The European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) launched a survey to evaluate the current utilization of female pelvic MRI in clinical practice. METHODS: The ESUR female imaging subgroup developed an online survey that was then approved by the ESR board and circulated among the ESR members. The questions in the survey encompassed training and experience, indications for imaging and MR imaging protocols, reporting styles and preferences. The results of the survey were tabulated, and subgroups were compared using χ(2) test. RESULTS: A total of 5900 ESR members with an interest in both MRI and female pelvic imaging were invited to participate; 840 (14.23%) members completed the survey. Approximately 50% of respondents were academic radiologists (50.6%) and nearly 60% women (59.69%). One third of the respondents were subspecialized in Gynecological imaging. Nearly half of the survey participants were aware of the presence of ESUR guidelines for imaging of the female pelvis (47.1%). The adoption of the ESUR recommendations was higher among subspecialized and/or academic and/or senior and/or European radiologists compared to all others. The current ESUR recommendations about female pelvic MRI protocols were generally followed. However wide variations in practice were identified with respect to the use of contrast media. CONCLUSION: Female pelvic MRI protocol was generally following the ESUR recommendations, especially among subspecialized and academic radiologists. However, the fact that they are followed by only half of the participants highlights the need for wider awareness of these recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8960522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89605222022-04-12 MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey Nougaret, Stephanie Lakhman, Yulia Gourgou, Sophie Kubik-Huch, Rahel Derchi, Lorenzo Sala, Evis Forstner, Rosemarie Insights Imaging Statement OBJECTIVES: While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for the imaging of female pelvis, there is an ongoing debate about the most appropriate indications and optimal imaging protocols. The European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) launched a survey to evaluate the current utilization of female pelvic MRI in clinical practice. METHODS: The ESUR female imaging subgroup developed an online survey that was then approved by the ESR board and circulated among the ESR members. The questions in the survey encompassed training and experience, indications for imaging and MR imaging protocols, reporting styles and preferences. The results of the survey were tabulated, and subgroups were compared using χ(2) test. RESULTS: A total of 5900 ESR members with an interest in both MRI and female pelvic imaging were invited to participate; 840 (14.23%) members completed the survey. Approximately 50% of respondents were academic radiologists (50.6%) and nearly 60% women (59.69%). One third of the respondents were subspecialized in Gynecological imaging. Nearly half of the survey participants were aware of the presence of ESUR guidelines for imaging of the female pelvis (47.1%). The adoption of the ESUR recommendations was higher among subspecialized and/or academic and/or senior and/or European radiologists compared to all others. The current ESUR recommendations about female pelvic MRI protocols were generally followed. However wide variations in practice were identified with respect to the use of contrast media. CONCLUSION: Female pelvic MRI protocol was generally following the ESUR recommendations, especially among subspecialized and academic radiologists. However, the fact that they are followed by only half of the participants highlights the need for wider awareness of these recommendations. Springer Vienna 2022-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8960522/ /pubmed/35347481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01152-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Statement
Nougaret, Stephanie
Lakhman, Yulia
Gourgou, Sophie
Kubik-Huch, Rahel
Derchi, Lorenzo
Sala, Evis
Forstner, Rosemarie
MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey
title MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey
title_full MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey
title_fullStr MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey
title_full_unstemmed MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey
title_short MRI in female pelvis: an ESUR/ESR survey
title_sort mri in female pelvis: an esur/esr survey
topic Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35347481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-01152-w
work_keys_str_mv AT nougaretstephanie mriinfemalepelvisanesuresrsurvey
AT lakhmanyulia mriinfemalepelvisanesuresrsurvey
AT gourgousophie mriinfemalepelvisanesuresrsurvey
AT kubikhuchrahel mriinfemalepelvisanesuresrsurvey
AT derchilorenzo mriinfemalepelvisanesuresrsurvey
AT salaevis mriinfemalepelvisanesuresrsurvey
AT forstnerrosemarie mriinfemalepelvisanesuresrsurvey
AT mriinfemalepelvisanesuresrsurvey