Cargando…
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) causes colonization and infection predominantly in hospitalized patients. Distinction between the two is a challenge. When CRAB is isolated from a non-sterile site (soft tissue, respiratory samples, etc.), it probably represents colonization unless...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35175509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00597-w |
_version_ | 1784677397354774528 |
---|---|
author | Bartal, Carmi Rolston, Kenneth V. I. Nesher, Lior |
author_facet | Bartal, Carmi Rolston, Kenneth V. I. Nesher, Lior |
author_sort | Bartal, Carmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) causes colonization and infection predominantly in hospitalized patients. Distinction between the two is a challenge. When CRAB is isolated from a non-sterile site (soft tissue, respiratory samples, etc.), it probably represents colonization unless clear signs of infection (fever, elevated white blood count, elevated inflammatory markers and abnormal imaging) are present. Treatment is warranted only for true infections. In normally sterile sites (blood, cerebrospinal fluid) the presence of indwelling medical devices (catheters, stents) should be considered when evaluating positive cultures. In the absence of such devices, the isolate represents an infection and should be treated. If an indwelling device is present and there are no signs of active infection, the device should be replaced if possible, and no treatment is required. If there are signs of an active infection the device should be removed or replaced, and treatment should be administered. Current treatments options and clinical data are limited. No agent or combination regimen has been shown to be superior to any other in randomized clinical trials. Ampicillin-sulbactam appears to have the best evidence for initial use. This is probably due to its ability to saturate penicillin-binding proteins 1 and 3 when given in high dose. Tigecycline when used should be given in high dose as well. Polymyxins are a treatment option but are difficult to dose correctly and have significant side effects. Newer treatment options such as eravacycline and cefiderocol have potential; however, currently there are not enough data to support their use as single agents. Combination therapy appears to be the best treatment option and should always include high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam combined with another active agent such as high-dose tigecycline, polymyxins, etc. These infections require a high complexity of skill, and an infectious disease specialist should be involved in the management of these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8960525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89605252022-04-12 Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options Bartal, Carmi Rolston, Kenneth V. I. Nesher, Lior Infect Dis Ther Review Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) causes colonization and infection predominantly in hospitalized patients. Distinction between the two is a challenge. When CRAB is isolated from a non-sterile site (soft tissue, respiratory samples, etc.), it probably represents colonization unless clear signs of infection (fever, elevated white blood count, elevated inflammatory markers and abnormal imaging) are present. Treatment is warranted only for true infections. In normally sterile sites (blood, cerebrospinal fluid) the presence of indwelling medical devices (catheters, stents) should be considered when evaluating positive cultures. In the absence of such devices, the isolate represents an infection and should be treated. If an indwelling device is present and there are no signs of active infection, the device should be replaced if possible, and no treatment is required. If there are signs of an active infection the device should be removed or replaced, and treatment should be administered. Current treatments options and clinical data are limited. No agent or combination regimen has been shown to be superior to any other in randomized clinical trials. Ampicillin-sulbactam appears to have the best evidence for initial use. This is probably due to its ability to saturate penicillin-binding proteins 1 and 3 when given in high dose. Tigecycline when used should be given in high dose as well. Polymyxins are a treatment option but are difficult to dose correctly and have significant side effects. Newer treatment options such as eravacycline and cefiderocol have potential; however, currently there are not enough data to support their use as single agents. Combination therapy appears to be the best treatment option and should always include high-dose ampicillin-sulbactam combined with another active agent such as high-dose tigecycline, polymyxins, etc. These infections require a high complexity of skill, and an infectious disease specialist should be involved in the management of these patients. Springer Healthcare 2022-02-17 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8960525/ /pubmed/35175509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00597-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Bartal, Carmi Rolston, Kenneth V. I. Nesher, Lior Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options |
title | Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options |
title_full | Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options |
title_fullStr | Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options |
title_full_unstemmed | Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options |
title_short | Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Colonization, Infection and Current Treatment Options |
title_sort | carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii: colonization, infection and current treatment options |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35175509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00597-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bartalcarmi carbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniicolonizationinfectionandcurrenttreatmentoptions AT rolstonkennethvi carbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniicolonizationinfectionandcurrenttreatmentoptions AT nesherlior carbapenemresistantacinetobacterbaumanniicolonizationinfectionandcurrenttreatmentoptions |