Cargando…
Adverse Reactions in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-Malarial DM1157: An Example of Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Guiding Clinical Trial Decisions
INTRODUCTION: There is an urgent need to develop new drugs to treat malaria due to increasing resistance to first-line therapeutics targeting the causative organism, Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum). One drug candidate is DM1157, a small molecule that inhibits the formation of hemozoin, which p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00605-z |
_version_ | 1784677402041909248 |
---|---|
author | Balevic, Stephen J. Raja, Shruti M. Randell, Rachel Deye, Gregory A. Conrad, Thomas Nakamura, Aya Peyton, David H. Shotwell, Sandra Liebman, Katherine Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael Guptill, Jeffrey T. |
author_facet | Balevic, Stephen J. Raja, Shruti M. Randell, Rachel Deye, Gregory A. Conrad, Thomas Nakamura, Aya Peyton, David H. Shotwell, Sandra Liebman, Katherine Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael Guptill, Jeffrey T. |
author_sort | Balevic, Stephen J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is an urgent need to develop new drugs to treat malaria due to increasing resistance to first-line therapeutics targeting the causative organism, Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum). One drug candidate is DM1157, a small molecule that inhibits the formation of hemozoin, which protects P. falciparum from heme toxicity. We describe a first-in-human, phase 1 trial of DM1157 in healthy adult volunteers that was halted early because of significant toxicity. METHODS: Adverse events were summarized using descriptive statistics. We used pharmacokinetic modeling to quantitatively assess whether the DM1157 exposure needed for P. falciparum inhibition was achievable at safe doses. RESULTS: We found that there was no dose where both the safety and efficacy target were simultaneously achieved; conversely, the model predicted that 27 mg was the highest dosage at which patients would consistently maintain safe exposure with multiple dosing. By pre-defining dose escalation stopping rules and conducting an interim pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis, we determined that the study would be unable to safely achieve a dosage needed to observe an anti-malarial effect, thereby providing strong rationale to halt the study. CONCLUSION: This study provides an important example of the risks and challenges of conducting early phase research as well as the role of modeling and simulation to optimize participant safety (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03490162). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-022-00605-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8960550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89605502022-04-12 Adverse Reactions in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-Malarial DM1157: An Example of Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Guiding Clinical Trial Decisions Balevic, Stephen J. Raja, Shruti M. Randell, Rachel Deye, Gregory A. Conrad, Thomas Nakamura, Aya Peyton, David H. Shotwell, Sandra Liebman, Katherine Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael Guptill, Jeffrey T. Infect Dis Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: There is an urgent need to develop new drugs to treat malaria due to increasing resistance to first-line therapeutics targeting the causative organism, Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum). One drug candidate is DM1157, a small molecule that inhibits the formation of hemozoin, which protects P. falciparum from heme toxicity. We describe a first-in-human, phase 1 trial of DM1157 in healthy adult volunteers that was halted early because of significant toxicity. METHODS: Adverse events were summarized using descriptive statistics. We used pharmacokinetic modeling to quantitatively assess whether the DM1157 exposure needed for P. falciparum inhibition was achievable at safe doses. RESULTS: We found that there was no dose where both the safety and efficacy target were simultaneously achieved; conversely, the model predicted that 27 mg was the highest dosage at which patients would consistently maintain safe exposure with multiple dosing. By pre-defining dose escalation stopping rules and conducting an interim pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis, we determined that the study would be unable to safely achieve a dosage needed to observe an anti-malarial effect, thereby providing strong rationale to halt the study. CONCLUSION: This study provides an important example of the risks and challenges of conducting early phase research as well as the role of modeling and simulation to optimize participant safety (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03490162). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-022-00605-z. Springer Healthcare 2022-02-20 2022-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8960550/ /pubmed/35184256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00605-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Balevic, Stephen J. Raja, Shruti M. Randell, Rachel Deye, Gregory A. Conrad, Thomas Nakamura, Aya Peyton, David H. Shotwell, Sandra Liebman, Katherine Cohen-Wolkowiez, Michael Guptill, Jeffrey T. Adverse Reactions in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-Malarial DM1157: An Example of Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Guiding Clinical Trial Decisions |
title | Adverse Reactions in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-Malarial DM1157: An Example of Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Guiding Clinical Trial Decisions |
title_full | Adverse Reactions in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-Malarial DM1157: An Example of Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Guiding Clinical Trial Decisions |
title_fullStr | Adverse Reactions in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-Malarial DM1157: An Example of Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Guiding Clinical Trial Decisions |
title_full_unstemmed | Adverse Reactions in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-Malarial DM1157: An Example of Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Guiding Clinical Trial Decisions |
title_short | Adverse Reactions in a Phase 1 Trial of the Anti-Malarial DM1157: An Example of Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation Guiding Clinical Trial Decisions |
title_sort | adverse reactions in a phase 1 trial of the anti-malarial dm1157: an example of pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation guiding clinical trial decisions |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8960550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35184256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00605-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balevicstephenj adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions AT rajashrutim adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions AT randellrachel adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions AT deyegregorya adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions AT conradthomas adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions AT nakamuraaya adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions AT peytondavidh adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions AT shotwellsandra adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions AT liebmankatherine adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions AT cohenwolkowiezmichael adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions AT guptilljeffreyt adversereactionsinaphase1trialoftheantimalarialdm1157anexampleofpharmacokineticmodelingandsimulationguidingclinicaltrialdecisions |